ga7 wrote:Since my case on Chu is so ignored it makes me more paranoid, I'll stick to this, feel free to make another or just keep lurking Shiver me timbers!
vote ga7 You make the case against him, but you place no vote. I've seen scum do this all the time, letting someone else start the bandwagon so that it keeps your hands clean.
Uh I thought my vote was there from the start, forgot about the spiesr thing that caused me to unground. Of course I want to start that wagon, I revendicate it Ground Chu
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
ga7 wrote:Since my case on Chu is so ignored it makes me more paranoid, I'll stick to this, feel free to make another or just keep lurking Shiver me timbers!
vote ga7 You make the case against him, but you place no vote. I've seen scum do this all the time, letting someone else start the bandwagon so that it keeps your hands clean.
Many people have put suspicion on people without voting for them, it's nawt really a scumming thing to do in mah mind. I personally think you're grasping at straws. It's easy to remember that Frenchie-chan is pushing heavily at mah lynch.
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
ga7 wrote:Since my case on Chu is so ignored it makes me more paranoid, I'll stick to this, feel free to make another or just keep lurking Shiver me timbers!
vote ga7 You make the case against him, but you place no vote. I've seen scum do this all the time, letting someone else start the bandwagon so that it keeps your hands clean.
Many people have put suspicion on people without voting for them, it's nawt really a scumming thing to do in mah mind. I personally think you're grasping at straws. It's easy to remember that Frenchie-chan is pushing heavily at mah lynch.
Well we can debate whether or not it is a scum tell all day. I personally find it scummy, but thats my opinion.
Well, I wouldn't mind hearing a claim from fircoal. It could in theory provide some useful info. On the other-hand I am not really sure enough about him being scummy to really advocate lynching him at this point...
spiesr wrote:Well, I wouldn't mind hearing a claim from fircoal. It could in theory provide some useful info. On the other-hand I am not really sure enough about him being scummy to really advocate lynching him at this point...
wtf.... Does anyone notice that there is only ONE person pushing for any course of action on me, he may be the only one playing but as of yet no one as actually backed him up on his ideas and what not. Please don't tell me that you're honestly trying to get a claim when there's only one vote one me, cause really that's just ridiculous.
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
I feel like I should just give it up and play like the rest of you since that's apparently ok to just wait for night to come or the game to be abandonned, whichever comes first... -_- FOS Spiesr, while I keep my suspicions on Fircoal, if he is in fact town that is a huge scumtell for you to try to get a claim out of nowhere when you didn't even vote.
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
ga7 wrote:I feel like I should just give it up and play like the rest of you since that's apparently ok to just wait for night to come or the game to be abandonned, whichever comes first... -_- FOS Spiesr, while I keep my suspicions on Fircoal, if he is in fact town that is a huge scumtell for you to try to get a claim out of nowhere when you didn't even vote.
Your case on fir is probably the best we have, but I don't necessarily deem it deserving of a lynch. I would rather hear from the other players first.
I'll go ahead and vote spiesr for fishing for a claim. I don't want this game to die.
Well, that didn't work out as I had hoped. I suppose I had better explain my reasoning there.
I am Albert, the tracker.
Night 1 I tracked Fircoal. He went nowhere.
Night 2 I tracked freezie. He went nowhere.
The idea was that I wanted a claim out of Fircoal because I couldn't yet prove him to be scum, but I had the potential to disprove a fake claim. If he fake claimed that he went someone night 1 I could disprove that and then we would have a safe lynch here at LYOL.
Given spiesr's input, it seems like Fircoal is innocent... if he was mafia, then we would see that he would have at least visited another mafia member, right?
in light of that, ga7 looks suspicious for pushing so heavily on the fir lynch with very little reason... yes, a few slightly suspicious posts, but isn't that always fir?
so i'm going to unvote vote ga7
lalaland wrote:Given spiesr's input, it seems like Fircoal is innocent... if he was mafia, then we would see that he would have at least visited another mafia member, right?
lalaland wrote:Given spiesr's input, it seems like Fircoal is innocent... if he was mafia, then we would see that he would have at least visited another mafia member, right?
What makes you think this? unvote
Isn't that how it usually works? I mean, if it would usually work otherwise, correct me...
Yeah, I don't know where you got that idea. From what I understand who a scum would visit in a night would go like this. If the scum has some special ability, like role-blocker, then he would visit the person he used that ability on. If not, he would visit the person the scum kill, or no one, depending on if he is the member who personally made the kill. I imagine that the details of this vary from mod to mod, but I doubt that he would visit a fellow scum member just becuase they talked during the night. If it worked that way then "talking" would have to be considered a night action and be affected by roleblocks and whatnot...
spiesr wrote:Yeah, I don't know where you got that idea. From what I understand who a scum would visit in a night would go like this. If the scum has some special ability, like role-blocker, then he would visit the person he used that ability on. If not, he would visit the person the scum kill, or no one, depending on if he is the member who personally made the kill. I imagine that the details of this vary from mod to mod, but I doubt that he would visit a fellow scum member just becuase they talked during the night. If it worked that way then "talking" would have to be considered a night action and be affected by roleblocks and whatnot...
Agreed. I've never heard of talking being trackable before, but then again you don't see too many trackers in games nowadays.
spiesr wrote:Yeah, I don't know where you got that idea. From what I understand who a scum would visit in a night would go like this. If the scum has some special ability, like role-blocker, then he would visit the person he used that ability on. If not, he would visit the person the scum kill, or no one, depending on if he is the member who personally made the kill. I imagine that the details of this vary from mod to mod, but I doubt that he would visit a fellow scum member just becuase they talked during the night. If it worked that way then "talking" would have to be considered a night action and be affected by roleblocks and whatnot...
Agreed. I've never heard of talking being trackable before, but then again you don't see too many trackers in games nowadays.
Yeah, I guess I'm not that familiar with the role.
But at least it rules out godfather, right?
But also cop/doctor/roleblocker type helpful roles...
Sigh, tracker never detected linked people, I've never seen it used that way. It follows a person performing a night action on another, while communicating as either scum or mason would be more akin to use a phone, it's not an action, it can't be blocked.
As for how the mafia kill works it depends on the mod. Personally when I'm GF I try to negociate with the mod to have the choice on who performs the kill if they don't have a requirement. Else it can be a 'vanilla' goon, or the GF...
Anyway I do wonder since so many town roles with no action were killed already...
Chu, would you mind giving just your character name? (provided it's not role-obvious, but it shouldn't be) I got an idea...
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
if we can get a replacement for freezie, maybe he/she can read through and get us a fresh perspective on things? somebody new might be able to pick up on things that we've missed
lalaland wrote:if we can get a replacement for freezie, maybe he/she can read through and get us a fresh perspective on things? somebody new might be able to pick up on things that we've missed