Moderator: Community Team
Vote TheSaxlad.TheSaxlad wrote:unvote
vote victor
VioIet wrote:Fircoal wrote:If I didn't read my role then how would I know if I was scum or town? I wouldn't. So you couldn't call me scum based off my actionsVioIet wrote:Hmmm, saxlad, thats the third time you've changed your vote within the last two pages.
Major FOS Saxlad
Only reason I'm not voting you is because I assume you read your role, unlike fircoal.
Keeping my vote on Fircoal for flawed logic.
I think this may be in particular, a third party scum lyncher tell.
First off, why would you not read your role?
Second, if you didn't read your role- why would you vote for someone, as you would really have no idea who's a townie or not. It's just an aimless vote- and you would have no idea whether it is helping to progress the gameplay or not. Also if you don't know for sure whether you are a townie or not- how could you even be motivated to help the town?
No one knows who is the mafia right now, except for the mafia of course. But at least if you know you are a townie, you automatically have some sort of motivation for helping the town and trying to find out who is mafia. Therefore, with any vote you cast- whether joking or not, it is still helping to progress the game and possibly find signs of scummish behavior from people.
So as you said, since you didn't read your role, you don't know if you are a townie. So then what is your motivation for voting? Perhaps you are really trying to deceive the town?
So you are purely acting as an independent agent right now? That just seems so serial killerish.
Still FOS sax.....lad, but at the moment i think fir is more suspicious then you. Only slightly though.
Fircoal wrote:edocsil wrote:Alright, everyone but colton has read their role. He hasn't been on in over 10 days so I think I will need a replacement.
hmmm? I didn't read it...
But now I did, and fir2mzel.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
then well veryTheSaxlad wrote:Following on from my last post I had a chance to search someone before the game started, one of edocs twists i spose, and i wanted a scum tell so I searched tails.
His motives are for the town. Not against.
This is my reasoning, plus VioIet seems to be wanting tails off pretty bad, perhaps she got what i did as a scum?
Im not a raving loony trust me on this one.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
andVictor Sullivan wrote:Yeah, especially since naxus didn't actually vote no lynch. Unvote vote Tails. Silly mistake, bro...aage wrote:They're probably voting Tails because he's agreeing w/ Naxus. He shouldn't have. It's stupid to suggest, but it's probably more stupid to agree.VioIet wrote:Wait a minute Fircoal and Illiad.
Why the sudden votes on Tails? Are you voting tails for suggesting no lynch?
Because no lynch was naxus' idea.
So then if you are basing your vote purely on that, why not vote naxus then, instead of tails?
Had to be some reason why you chose tail over naxus?
I don't understand why the gunning for me. Voting no lynch was a legitimate reason to vote for Tails, three other people did. And Tails' BW accusation was just an attempt to save his ass, and I called him out on it. I am not against accepting believable enough information for Tails' innocence, so I unvoted. I don't see why TheSaxlad would risk himself otherwise.Victor Sullivan wrote:You're gonna pin that on anyone who makes the third or fourth vote. I at least made another justification for my vote. I feel like you're desperately attempting to divert attention from yourself. My vote stands.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:lol well I don't think its n00bish. What's n00bish is lynching a townie D1 because of an imagined scumtell. We have no idea how many scum vs. townies there are, so the most likely outcome of a lynch is a townie. What's scummy is Vic BW'ing.
-Tails
-Sully
The "*knows*" part is great though, exactly the kind of stuff we want on D1. Gives us something to come back and compare against if/when we get a more definitive result on TG. Not that I'm overly convinced that Saxlad can be trusted but still.aage wrote:I also am surprised on the twist that TheSaxLad is taking. If I read correctly what he states in his posts, he *knows* Tailgunner is pro-town, and next thing we know we should be following him into a blind bandwagon on Victor?
Perhaps after noticing that you were not able to get rid of one, you decided to do a full swing towards another perhaps taking along a vote or two which may get that lynch?TheSaxlad wrote:Commander, if I was scum I would have seen that tails is town and would not have kicked up a fuss now would I?
Think about it.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
There really isn't much for me to say except that I don't trust sax..lad. He's just been too much of a flipper. Nor do I think Victor is scummy. Also sax...lad seems to mix me and victor up- and i certainly don't appreciate the mix-up there. He is trying to make me look scummy for no reason.Victor Sullivan wrote:And why hasn't Vio posted anything (recently)??
I just posted yesterday, and have been fairly active.
I suppose this makes my argument against Fircoal null and void. DarnFircoal wrote:
edocsil wrote:Alright, everyone but colton has read their role. He hasn't been on in over 10 days so I think I will need a replacement.
hmmm? I didn't read it...
But now I did, and fir2mzel.

VioIet wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:And why hasn't Vio posted anything (recently)??
I just posted yesterday, and have been fairly active.
Oops sorry Victor. SighVictor Sullivan wrote:VioIet wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:And why hasn't Vio posted anything (recently)??
I just posted yesterday, and have been fairly active.I didn't say that. FOS VioIet for misquoting me.
Victor Sullivan wrote:And why hasn't Vio posted anything (recently)??
/quote]
I was the one who said "I just posted yesterday, and have been fairly active."
I still seem to have a difficult time with that quote button


Ok, she's gone.VioIet wrote:Important Announcement
Going out of Town Now
Will be back Sunday.
May or may not be able to post before then. Just letting you guys know, just in case.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Yeah. But hey.Haggis_McMutton wrote:Hmm, that's a fair point.
Also, is not revealing that you've got an investigative role just to save a townie generally a bad idea?
Sax, didn't you think you'd get targeted tonight for revealing that?
Er, yes. A very bad idea. Rather let the towny die then get yourself killed instead. Especially if it's a random vt or some uninteresting role that is inferior to your own investigative skills. It all comes down to this: never trust the doc. You don't know who he is, so you can't trust him.Haggis_McMutton wrote:Also, is not revealing that you've got an investigative role just to save a townie generally a bad idea?
Which is really an easy point to make against Violet with her ridiculous "fir didn't read his role" theory, so he appears to be contributing to the thread. I'm thinking scum or 3rd party especially, to fly under the radar.Jace22 wrote:Yeah I agree with aage with this. VioIet I'm pretty sure you should assume someone knows what their role is
unvote vote VioIet.
Also, can we get a vote update
Tails makes a good point, and I think it's the best we have to go off of right now. Unvote, vote Jace22. I think it's role-claim time, scummarinerTA1LGUNN3R wrote:unvote vote Jace22
Scummarining. Only has 4 posts. His first 2 were in/confirm, and 3rd was a joke vote. His only serious vote was:
Which is really an easy point to make against Violet with her ridiculous "fir didn't read his role" theory, so he appears to be contributing to the thread. I'm thinking scum or 3rd party especially, to fly under the radar.Jace22 wrote:Yeah I agree with aage with this. VioIet I'm pretty sure you should assume someone knows what their role is
unvote vote VioIet.
Also, can we get a vote update
-Tails