Moderator: Community Team
Okay, awesome, appreciate the info.Haggis_McMutton wrote:Finger of Suspicion.
Basically you find the guy suspicious but not enough so to actually vote for him.
THE MORE YOU KNOW
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
I don't follow, what has many people have to do with no lynch?Army of GOD wrote:Since we have so many people, perhaps we should no lynch?
Well, I'd think that we'd have an abnormal number of citizens compared to scum for this game (aka it's not proportional to the other games) so our chances of lynching scum randomly the first day is pretty damn low.Haggis_McMutton wrote:I don't follow, what has many people have to do with no lynch?Army of GOD wrote:Since we have so many people, perhaps we should no lynch?
Explain, since that isn't true. When you FOS or VOTE someone, you need to provide some reasoning behind it. Otherwise it looks bad for you. Like you are simply throwing up smoke. (You are.) But please explain what you mean.Commander9 wrote:Okay, awesome, appreciate the info.Haggis_McMutton wrote:Finger of Suspicion.
Basically you find the guy suspicious but not enough so to actually vote for him.
THE MORE YOU KNOW
I'll keep my vote on Sax for now and FoS the herk as he seems to be following Sax a lot with his decisions.
Interaction wrote:Sax wrote: Surely Pointing Out all the inactives, trying to draw the vote away from them is a scumtell?
FOS Strikewolf.
Myself wrote:He went to all the trouble of pointing out inactives when he didn't have to and you FOS him? I don't think he would be so concerned unless we have a townie...
Commander, I went to bed 6pages ago, and woke up to this.Commander9 wrote:No offence, but you sir can't read. At all.spiesr wrote:Anyway, saying that how much negative attention daze drew is a sign that she wouldn't be scum is bad logic at best. She could have had any role and made the same series of mistakes. Defending someone with flawed logic such as this just makes the both of you look like scum mates...
Again, this is my 2nd game, so I still don't know the stuff well enough. If possible to replace the inactives, I'm all for it. As for Sax, first of all, he goes on to vote people for a lot of random stuff, yet now, when the action has started and there have been quite a few interesting things going on, he has disappeared and not posted anything for a while (6 pages ago was his last post).FloresDelMal wrote:whatever you say, but stop avoiding give a real reason for vote saxland as i asked you in my previous post (oh and inactives should be replaced not lynched if we get better leads)
I just don't like a person to flip votes all over the place around at the start, yet when some discussions started, he's gone.
spiesr wrote:FOS herkman. Whether or not you agree with Commander9's assertion that you may be either linked with saxland, or just following his poor logic, it seems like an over reason for you to instantly assert that he must be scum for having made accusations against you. Is this because you have something to hide and are trying to use excessive force to kill any case against you before it can get of the ground? (Basically for the OMGUS)


Dude PLEASE READ THIS. You're all over the place, man.theherkman wrote:spiesr wrote:FOS herkman. Whether or not you agree with Commander9's assertion that you may be either linked with saxland, or just following his poor logic, it seems like an over reason for you to instantly assert that he must be scum for having made accusations against you. Is this because you have something to hide and are trying to use excessive force to kill any case against you before it can get of the ground? (Basically for the OMGUS)
OMGUS = Oh my god you suck?
Anywho... I just think he is throwing his vote around like crazy with absolutely NO reason at all for doing so. I think it is suspicious.
PS - You're gonna role claim tomorrow? Haha this should be good.
wtf? Names don't mean shit. Also don't try to solicit useless claims from people. A maf is just gonna lie, and if a n00b townie claims with a power role they're gonna get targeted.theherkman wrote:Give me a hint, at least tell me your name. I will tell you mine...
(Do our roles come with names? Ima go check...)
Don't roleclaim unless you're about to be lynched, or are a cop after an investigation. You're at 2 or 3 votes, no one cares about you.TheSaxlad wrote:I can assure you I am not mafia, and whether it be my death or whether the doc chooses to protect me, if a cop searches me and can back up I will roleclaim next round.
Army of GOD wrote:Haha herk, you sound like someone on crack. It's day 1 and you're L-15. Calm down.

indeed, and if she turns up to be scum, i say violet will be quite likely scum, in a best case scenario getting 2 scums with 1 lynch could result in an unusually productive day 1.Haggis_McMutton wrote:Also, gamewise, I'm uncertain.
I'll try to re-read the last few pages soon. My vote stays on dazer at least till then, as right now i can't think of a better lead.
is not like she is at -1 and anyway if we put enough pressure on her we can get her to claim and then decide if lynching her is a good idea or not, if she have a convincing claim ill be the first in unvote and move on.naxus wrote:Unvote
While i do not believe that Daze is scum per se, she has done a few scum tells. FOS Daze but i would rather not do a semi random lynch and would like to follow up on either saxlads strange vote switching or killing of a inactive.
FOS aog, flawed logic much? explain how go no lynch on day 1 helps town tsk tsk, and why do you assume that the host is running a unbalanced game that favour town? or do you know exactly how many scum buddies you have?Army of GOD wrote: Well, I'd think that we'd have an abnormal number of citizens compared to scum for this game (aka it's not proportional to the other games) so our chances of lynching scum randomly the first day is pretty damn low.
TheSaxlad wrote:Guys, This is my first mafia game as well.
I can assure you I am not mafia, and whether it be my death or whether the doc chooses to protect me, if a cop searches me and can back up I will roleclaim next round.
You dont have to back me openly, just dont vote for me.
theherkman wrote:Yes, they do!! I wanna' say my name. Can I say my name? How can anyone safely role claim? If you claim mafia you get lynched, if you claim doc/cop/good person you get NK'd... How is it that anyone is gonna roleclaim then?
Because, miller is a terrible fake claim. The town would likely lynch you if you claimed that.theherkman wrote:But what if he is mafia and he is putting this idea out there so when he is investigated and comes up scum he can point back here as a defense?
When the town forces them to in order to prove why they should not be lynched.theherkman wrote:How is it that anyone is gonna roleclaim then?
This line sounds fairly scummy to me...TheSaxlad wrote:You don't have to back me openly, just don't vote for me.