-Sully
DATA:
-none-
Moderator: Community Team
There's a dice analyzer for that, you realize.Victor Sullivan wrote:...are absolutely fine (or so we will find out...)! (And you thought you'd have to lock this thread, eh, mods?) The point of this thread is not to bash all those who dislike the dice, it is an experiment I'm starting up. I am going to record in this post all of my rolls each day, then calculate the probabilities to see if the dice are indeed unfair, or if the supposedly unfair instances are blown out of proportion. Feel free to do the same, anyone who wants to, but I would sincerely like to keep this thread clean of anti-dice or unrelated posts and comments. I want to keep this as strictly unbiased/objective as possible. I will be starting my records tomorrow (when I take my next turns).
And that's fine. I just don't think the sample size will be meaningful until a couple of years have passed, so...Victor Sullivan wrote:Yes, actually. But I feel hard evidence is what these people need, so I do this.
he could probably just eat more bran to take care of that problem... or wear darker under garments..-the black jesusCommander62890 wrote:I assume you will be analyzing the "streakiness" of your dice?


Robinette wrote:Depends on what metric you use...Kaskavel wrote:Seriously. Who is the female conqueror of CC?
The coolest is squishyg
now, now, don't deprive the lad of his fun. this work is in the name of science!Timminz wrote:Just use the dice-analyzer. It will be a lot easier, and you don't even have to remember to record your rolls.

Robinette wrote:Depends on what metric you use...Kaskavel wrote:Seriously. Who is the female conqueror of CC?
The coolest is squishyg
Yeah, but the inevitability of human error means that data recorded in a notebook can only be trusted as much as you want to. The dice-analyzer script would proBably be better in the name of science.squishyg wrote:now, now, don't deprive the lad of his fun. this work is in the name of science!Timminz wrote:Just use the dice-analyzer. It will be a lot easier, and you don't even have to remember to record your rolls.

Until you realize that it was programmed by a mod who is in lack's pocket to make it seem that the dice intensity cubes are indeed random...Master Fenrir wrote:Yeah, but the inevitability of human error means that data recorded in a notebook can only be trusted as much as you want to. The dice-analyzer script would proably be better in the name of science.squishyg wrote:now, now, don't deprive the lad of his fun. this work is in the name of science!Timminz wrote:Just use the dice-analyzer. It will be a lot easier, and you don't even have to remember to record your rolls.

Indeedy do! Thanks, cav.laughingcavalier wrote:I'm all for sully doing it the hard way. The harder he works the more beautiful his results will be. Beauty being truth, the results will give us much more insight than the dice analyzer could.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.