Moderator: Community Team
Fair enough point. I am fairly new to mafia games.everywhere116 wrote:Now that I think about is, syzygy, you seem to be as big of a submarine as mach. You started to post at about page 6(?) and then average about one post a page. Until page 13, where you post that it takes 7 to lynch. Fast forward to now, page 22, and this is your first post sincer page 13. I think you are trying to fly under the radar with mach, so that you can stay out of discussion to try not to be caufght.
FOS Syzygy
band wagon is when a bunch of people jump on a vote when one person votes and makes a "point" that may or may not be true...common mafia tactic...Hitman079 wrote:someone tell me what a bandwagon is.Aimless wrote: Does this bandwagon look suspicious to anyone else?
<mafia noob
Yes, as a matter of fact, it has started awfully fast, and Mach hasn't even had a chance to log on and say anything... 3 votes when it takes 8 to lynch looks like the bginning of a bandwagon... Especially when it is 3 people that are all very suspicious anyway!Aimless wrote:Does this bandwagon look suspicious to anyone else?Hitman079 wrote:Town Vote Count
[3] Machiavelli (vgmmaster, pyro55, Puff)
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
No shit... Did you just give something away as the Mod???Hitman079 wrote:let's just hurry up and lynch Mach's ass before i have to wade through tens of pages of flip-flopping voters.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Here you goAimless wrote:Well, that bandwagon still looks scummy to me, and Puff hasn't given a defense, so :
Vote: Puff
XenHu wrote: JESUS CHRIST! ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND?!![]()
*ahem*
That is all.
Lamest defense ever. Vote: PuffPuff wrote:Here you goAimless wrote:Well, that bandwagon still looks scummy to me, and Puff hasn't given a defense, so :
Vote: Puff
1. I keep forgetting to post here
2. I voted mach because vgm raised a good point, mach did look suspicious.
3. If your voting me for agreeing with others which might lead to a bandwagon then unvote mach
vote aimless
4. that (what you did) is no excuse to vote someone. That is trying to start a bandwagon
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
I'm voting for you because :Puff wrote:3. If your voting me for agreeing with others which might lead to a bandwagon then unvote mach
vote aimless
4. that (what you did) is no excuse to vote someone. That is trying to start a bandwagon
Puff wrote:1. I keep forgetting to post here
min({x: x is prime}) : At the moment, from past actions (or inactions), you, pyro55, and vgmaster are topping my list of scum candidates. This was mentioned well before the bandwagon against Mach began (see page 21). That you are also all voting for Mach strikes me as strange, and additionally scummy.Anarkistsdream wrote:Considering that I have seen Puff and Pyro55 BOTH in other threads fairly often, I feel suspicious about their motives...