I say we let this happen.edocsil wrote:If he lives though this he will be vig killed.
Moderator: Community Team
I say we let this happen.edocsil wrote:If he lives though this he will be vig killed.
Post Restrictionz bitchezMeDeFe wrote:PR?Haggis_McMutton wrote:Also, is Saxdudes PR supposed to refer to some character or something? I'm kind of pop-culture-challenged
Ah, those. I feel there may be more than one character who has to overcome adversity in order to conquer.TheSaxlad wrote:Post Restrictionz bitchezMeDeFe wrote:PR?Haggis_McMutton wrote:Also, is Saxdudes PR supposed to refer to some character or something? I'm kind of pop-culture-challenged
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.


This appears somewhat self-contradictory to me. Of course Jesters tend to muck up efforts to find scum, but if he really is a Jester we'd be better off appealing to any vigilantes to take him out during the night instead of lynching him now.safariguy5 wrote:Jester tends to muck up town efforts to find scum. I'm for getting rid of distractions now, especially since it's Day 1.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
No it's fairly common for inexperienced people to claim far too early.Streaker wrote:It's fairly common to claim on day 1 that you aren't town?Iliad wrote:That was an unneccesary claim from justin, but that's fairly common mistake. I agree that you should reveal your role now.
Also I'm glad tdans is getting replaced instead of being a dead weight.


This appears to be the assumption Safariguy is working from. This is why I find it odd that Safariguy seems to say we should kill Justin asap (as in today, rather than generally ask for someone to kill him tonight)Fuzzylogic99 wrote:thats assuming
a) he really is a jester
This is an assumption I'm making, in a game with 21 players it's not an unreasonable one.b) theres a vigalante , a one shot kill etc
Or at least believes that Justin is enough of a nuisance to warrant killing. Given Justin's recent behaviour, this is also no unreasonable assumption, he's pissed off enough people to nearly get himself lynched already. If there's a town-aligned person with re-usable killing powers around it's fairly likely that Justin is toast tonight, even a one-shotter or joat might go for it.c) that person believes hes a jester
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.


pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
I've got to agree. If he really how to play a Jester this outrageously while being new to mafia then a great big kudos to him. IMO it looks much more likely that he's scum and panicked.Iliad wrote:I'm not really believing justin's bluff.
Agreed, Vote Justinassss.Iliad wrote:However I am willing to take the risk that he is a jester.
Iliad wrote:I do not remember the last time I saw a jester end the game.
Really mate, you need to learn how to differentiate between your in-game role and your RL person. Getting them mixed up never lead to anything good IMO.Justinassss wrote:I am just very sorry about all of you that decided to lynch me...![]()
I have no secret agenda, I am just a good sincere loving person who wants to enjoy playing Mafia games...
Thank you for offending me...
I disagree. The only role that is a worse lynch than a townie is a jester, any other 3rd party role is less beneficial to town than any town aligned role.Mr. Squirrel wrote:I'm sorry, but purposely lynching the jester is a terrible idea. My guess is that he really is the jester and did a terrible job with it. Safariguy has been making too many illogical posts and likely could be scum imo. Lynching a lyncher, a jester, or any third party (with the exception of a SK) is normally a bad idea. It leads to relatively little information and wastes a lynch.
Well of course. Not many confirmed scums on D1 though.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Scum are the only ones who should be lynch targets.
That would be true for anyone accept scum so unless you're advocating a no-lynch I can't see your point being valid.Mr. Squirrel wrote:2) even a third party player still counts as a vote. we are basically making it one day easier for scum to win
Seriously? Only scum would argue that another scum isn't a threat.Mr. Squirrel wrote:3) in the rare occurrence that he actually is scum, no offense but I can't see him being all that much of a threat. If, nearer to the end, we are hurting to find scum, we can reopen his case.
You cut noobs some slack, however if they insist on repeatedly acting scummy they don't get a free pass from being lynched.Mr. Squirrel wrote:And what ever happened to no lynching noobs? Shame on you guys...
Commander9 wrote: (well, by the looks of it now, I probably won't)
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Commander9 wrote:Lynching votes:
fircoal (1) - Mr.s Squirrel.
SafariGuy (2) - Fuzzy Logic, Mr. Squirrel.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that


