Moderator: Community Team
God......... I'm just learning as I go along. I'm sorry! And I know you won't accept it, but I've tried to make my peace. I fyou believe I'm a mafia, you believe that. I can't stop you.Anarkistsdream wrote:Thanks you... Yet more proof that Eddie STILL hasn't read the first damn page of rules...dcowboys055 wrote:All discussion must be in the thread-no pming unless you're masons or something...and that's still at night.Eddie Guerrero wrote:Sorry, I don't go on at night, I only go on at break and lunch. PM me any questions you have.
FOS: Eddie Guerrero
If you aren't going to bother to learn the rules, don't play the game... I say the same thing for any game, Risk, Chess, Monopoly, or Texas Hold'em... This seems like an obvious mafia tactic to me...

i have a reason! as Anarkistsdream has already said you have ignored the rules constantly! sorry josh but the vote still stands.Eddie Guerrero wrote:The caps lock was accidental!
And I couldn't replace because Anarkist'sdream would have a go at me.
I'm just saying you go with majority, and you are always suspicious of me.

cool. I was checking with you on your opinion, as you seem to be the most thorogh (sp?) and no, I am not just "skimming" the thread, as you say, I'm just new and trying to have fun. you could try that, its better than being angry.Anarkistsdream wrote:Nope, which is why I have repeatedly asked his reasons for his mistrust and vote of Colaalone... It makes no sense why he is voting. He keeps saying, go back through my other posts, but he never actually says anything beyond "suspicious"...Ehriggn wrote: Anarkist, has that gone unoticed by you? or are you not mentioning him to protect him? others have made there way under your microscope why not him?
And I have mentioned it, so apparently you must be skimming the thread... An obvious mafia technique.
Angry?!?!?!?Ehriggn wrote:cool. I was checking with you on your opinion, as you seem to be the most thorogh (sp?) and no, I am not just "skimming" the thread, as you say, I'm just new and trying to have fun. you could try that, its better than being angry.Anarkistsdream wrote:Nope, which is why I have repeatedly asked his reasons for his mistrust and vote of Colaalone... It makes no sense why he is voting. He keeps saying, go back through my other posts, but he never actually says anything beyond "suspicious"...Ehriggn wrote: Anarkist, has that gone unoticed by you? or are you not mentioning him to protect him? others have made there way under your microscope why not him?
And I have mentioned it, so apparently you must be skimming the thread... An obvious mafia technique.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Newcastle wrote:you idiot! they know our names now! you bloody idiot! you're going to get us all killed! idiot! idiot! idiot!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.