Moderator: Community Team
Welcome back Mr C. We missed you.Mr Changsha wrote:Something else that doesn't mix...Army of GOD wrote:Now instead of a love triangle, it's a love trapezoid.Mr Changsha wrote:That's just the kind of comment that gets old Mr C in trouble.JoshyBoy wrote:I love you Mr. C.
New Years Resolution for 2011...ignore the totty! Which is difficult, as Changsha is absolutely loaded with it and I'm a white guy with an uncanny ability to make said totty...titter.
Two cocks.
Whether that is on one individual, which would be frankly horrific if one comes to think about it, or a pair, two cocks should never be unleashed together in any kind of apparently hetrosexual context.
I was once offered the chance for a threesome with a chap and his girlfriend. They came around for a cup of tea, or whatever, and then started making out. I, naturally, went online. About 20 seconds later he had her tits out, she's got a good grip on, mad kissing and I really felt I had to say something. So I said "Ahem.." Not my wittiest moment I would admit. Chap breaks away from the girl and says "So uh...hey do you want to join in?" I immediately realised for the first time in my life (for I had never been in this situation before) that I didn't, really didn't want to want to see shagging as team sport (which is basically what I think is the impulse behind MMF rutting).
So I said "Well, I'll watch for a bit see what happens..." or something like that and then found myself having to watch a chap really go to town on this girl. Multi-difficult positions, lots of cardio, a big splash finish...and all the while me watching and feeling not in the slightest aroused. I was basically bored. I made a cup of tea at one point...much to the later hilarity of my pals.
So, at least for me, two cocks in a 'hetro-rutting scenario' simply do not mix.

Why? He spent days with his cross. Sounds like a solid mix to me.notyou2 wrote:jesus and crosses
I'm a walking, talking stereotype of an englishman. Imagine Boris Johnson with a lot less weight, a lot less money and a bit more hair and you're about there.notyou2 wrote:Welcome back Mr C. We missed you.Mr Changsha wrote:Something else that doesn't mix...Army of GOD wrote:Now instead of a love triangle, it's a love trapezoid.Mr Changsha wrote:That's just the kind of comment that gets old Mr C in trouble.JoshyBoy wrote:I love you Mr. C.
New Years Resolution for 2011...ignore the totty! Which is difficult, as Changsha is absolutely loaded with it and I'm a white guy with an uncanny ability to make said totty...titter.
Two cocks.
Whether that is on one individual, which would be frankly horrific if one comes to think about it, or a pair, two cocks should never be unleashed together in any kind of apparently hetrosexual context.
I was once offered the chance for a threesome with a chap and his girlfriend. They came around for a cup of tea, or whatever, and then started making out. I, naturally, went online. About 20 seconds later he had her tits out, she's got a good grip on, mad kissing and I really felt I had to say something. So I said "Ahem.." Not my wittiest moment I would admit. Chap breaks away from the girl and says "So uh...hey do you want to join in?" I immediately realised for the first time in my life (for I had never been in this situation before) that I didn't, really didn't want to want to see shagging as team sport (which is basically what I think is the impulse behind MMF rutting).
So I said "Well, I'll watch for a bit see what happens..." or something like that and then found myself having to watch a chap really go to town on this girl. Multi-difficult positions, lots of cardio, a big splash finish...and all the while me watching and feeling not in the slightest aroused. I was basically bored. I made a cup of tea at one point...much to the later hilarity of my pals.
So, at least for me, two cocks in a 'hetro-rutting scenario' simply do not mix.
Oh, umm, I say old chap, by any chance are you English?

lol...DangerBoy wrote:Woodruff and reading comprehension
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
You illiterate bastard...DangerBoy wrote:Woodruff and reading comprehension
notyou2 and Christianity, apparently.notyou2 wrote:jesus and crosses
Army of GOD wrote:Victor Sullivan and not-poop
Fixed it for you Mr SullivanVictor Sullivan wrote:notyou2 and organized religion, apparently.notyou2 wrote:jesus and crosses

Haven't you heard? Organized religion is to blame for all the shitty aspects of human nature. Once we get rid of organized religion, everyone will live in peace and harmony.thegreekdog wrote:Just organized religion?mpjh wrote:organized religion and tolerance
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
I'm just wondering about unorganized religion and whether that mixes with tolerance (to form a sort of delicious beverage). Or, alternatively, I could have been trying to troll mpjh's bait. Nah... definitely the former.john9blue wrote:Haven't you heard? Organized religion is to blame for all the shitty aspects of human nature. Once we get rid of organized religion, everyone will live in peace and harmony.thegreekdog wrote:Just organized religion?mpjh wrote:organized religion and tolerance
john9blue wrote:Haven't you heard? Organized religion is to blame for all the shitty aspects of human nature. Once we get rid of organized religion, everyone will live in peace and harmony.thegreekdog wrote:Just organized religion?mpjh wrote:organized religion and tolerance