Moderator: Community Team
Actually those posts accomplish the most. We all know scum are the ones who disagree with Fircoal.mandalorian2298 wrote:What this MEANS is that we (townies) won't accomplish jack shit if we keep spending our posts on things like: "Look Josh, we are on internet!", "My Xenie mods the bestest mafia games." "I mod the games that are bester then his bestest." "No you don't." "I vote you for saying that I don't.
" "I vote the1Exile on a hunch." etc.
![]()
Otherwise I argee with this post. But the 3rd vote is usually the badwagoner. Who tries to get it rolling.mandalorian2298 wrote: 2. It takes 14 to lynch. That means that if we keep voting ANYONE except the guy/gal we REALLY belive is scum, we will end this day with a few guys having 3-5 votes, no lynch being forced and mafia(s) merryly killing the night away. I repeat, the revenge votes not only add to the volume of the thread, but they also make it harder for scum (if found) to be lynched.
That being said, I would like to to state my choice for the vote: I vote dcowboys005 His first post came after Fircoal and Cola voted s.xkitten for no reason at all. Then came dcowboys, the merry bandwagon-jumper and posted his vote for s.xkitten. Nothing else. No adittion to their joke. Just a vote. Me thinks that he was taking a shot at building up a bandwagon and lynching kitten nice and early. When pancake FOSed him, this is his response.
dcowboys055 wrote:LOL!pancakemix wrote:FOS dcowboys for a completely random vote.
I was voting s.kitten to see if others would join the bandwagon, and to see how she reacted. Unvote. Even if it was just a completely a random vote, that's no reason to fos someone on page 2!
If Cola or Fircoal said that, I would buy it. But giving the 3rd vote isn't starting a bandwagon. It's BUILDING it. After wich you didn't post for 10 pages. Then all you posted was your defense of this FOS, wich didn't convince me. You definetly look scummier to me then Cola, or Newcastle (why Puff voted for him still baffles me).
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Well i give you credit for actually spending some time looking around but you're wrong. In a game with 27 people, and it takes 14 to lynch, the third vote is NOT building it as you say. If it took 5 to lynch it would be suspicious but not when i would have the chance to unvote, so long as i did it before 11 other people voted.mandalorian2298 wrote:That being said, I would like to to state my choice for the vote: I vote dcowboys005 His first post came after Fircoal and Cola voted s.xkitten for no reason at all. Then came dcowboys, the merry bandwagon-jumper and posted his vote for s.xkitten. Nothing else. No adittion to their joke. Just a vote. Me thinks that he was taking a shot at building up a bandwagon and lynching kitten nice and early. When pancake FOSed him, this is his response.
dcowboys055 wrote:LOL!pancakemix wrote:FOS dcowboys for a completely random vote.
I was voting s.kitten to see if others would join the bandwagon, and to see how she reacted. Unvote. Even if it was just a completely a random vote, that's no reason to fos someone on page 2!
If Cola or Fircoal said that, I would buy it. But giving the 3rd vote isn't starting a bandwagon. It's BUILDING it. After wich you didn't post for 10 pages. Then all you posted was your defense of this FOS, wich didn't convince me. You definetly look scummier to me then Cola, or Newcastle (why Puff voted for him still baffles me).
Really? LAME excuse. "I have an excuse not to post til sunday now"Sam Jam wrote:ok, sorry for not posting before but i came down with a bad cold and am still tryin to get over it.i will be well by sunday at the latest
You're not? But he made a huge post! Everyone should believe him because he typed a lot! That is a dumb reason to trust somebody, if i've ever heard one.Sam Jam wrote:with that huge post one page ago, mandalorian looks like somebody i can trust but im not putting my whole faith in him.
Really? Why not, we'd all like to know.Sam Jam wrote:either orange idaho dog or the1exile are mafia but i will decide not to share my reasons at this time.
Uh-huh, please state some more obviousness for us.Sam Jam wrote:anark i trust too but not fully for that list of nonposters. i have learned it is wiser to either replace or lynch a submarine than to follow a hunch unless it's a really solid hunch.
Oh god, please do.Sam Jam wrote:dcowboys i'm watchin you a little bit because of mandalorians good argument.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.