Moderator: Tournament Directors
Aw shit! You are indeed correct. (How embarrassing for the guy with the starter pistol...)MudPuppy wrote:The Steeplechase heats have been set up as 6 & 7-player singles games instead of 1v1 round robin matches as listed in the event description.Woodruff wrote:3000m Steeplechase – Map is King of the Mountains (flat rate, chained, foggy). Put all runners into evenly-sized qualifying heats of as many as possible (up to eight). They’ll round-robin in single 1-vs-1 matches to get the records in each qualifying heat. Top two records in each heat are automatically in the Finals.
Indeed it has (suddenly!). Thanks for the heads-up. (And check out the preliminary storylines, if you're interested...)Genoke wrote:I think the prelimination of the 400m hurdles has been finished...
I'm loving the play by play Woodruff. I hadn't read the prelim stuff until just now. CLASSic!Woodruff wrote:We now have our finalists for the 400 Meter Hurdles, and they are:
phantomzero4
Genoke5
ManBungalow3
hotfire6
MudPuppy2
Squirly7
nemrehs11
shoop76
Due to injury, shoop76 will not compete in the Finals, gaining 1 point for the Highlander Legends for that 8th place finish. So, in lane 1 we have nemrehs1. In lane 2, we have MudPuppy with ManBungalow next to him in lane 3. Lane 4 holds one of our two favorites in phantomzero with the other favorite next to him in lane five, that being Genoke. In lane 6 stands hotfire and in lane 7 is Squirly. They're set...and there's the gun!

Just a heads up that one of the heats on this map is terribly deadlocked Game 7783081. Is there an option of a tiebreaker with different settings?Woodruff wrote:400m Run – Map is Imperium Romanum (no spoils, unlimited, sunny). Put all runners into evenly-sized qualifying heats of as many as possible (up to eight).
If there are two or four qualifying heats, then the top four or two (respectively) would advance to the Finals.
If there are three qualifying heats, then the top two from each heat are in the Finals, while the two 3rd-place finishers who lasted for the most rounds in their game will finish 7th and 8th respectively.
If there are more than four qualifying heats, I will address it prior to this event starting.
400M RUN PRELIMINARY HEATS (finals qualifier):
Heat 1:_____________________Heat 2:_______________________Heat 3:
1. sherkaner (GP)____________1. stevieQ (GP)________________1. chiefsfan4ever (AOD)
2. MrBenn (VM)______________2. b00060 (SDF)________________2. smasher_123 (CCD)
3. dustin800 (AOD)____________3. vykingsfan64 (DTD)__________3. mwcc (TL)
4. BigBallinStalin (IB)__________4. lisbon101 (GWTW)___________4. jwithington (DTD)
5. mpjh (MVM)_______________5. talia-thomas (CCD)___________5. ViperOverLord (HL)
6. BoganGod (SSHG)__________6. Adow (HL)__________________6. DukeHazzard (DBC)
__________________________________________________________7. nesterdude (GWTW)

stevieQ wrote:Just a heads up that one of the heats on this map is terribly deadlocked Game 7783081. Is there an option of a tiebreaker with different settings?Woodruff wrote:400m Run – Map is Imperium Romanum (no spoils, unlimited, sunny). Put all runners into evenly-sized qualifying heats of as many as possible (up to eight).
If there are two or four qualifying heats, then the top four or two (respectively) would advance to the Finals.
If there are three qualifying heats, then the top two from each heat are in the Finals, while the two 3rd-place finishers who lasted for the most rounds in their game will finish 7th and 8th respectively.
If there are more than four qualifying heats, I will address it prior to this event starting.
400M RUN PRELIMINARY HEATS (finals qualifier):
Heat 1:_____________________Heat 2:_______________________Heat 3:
1. sherkaner (GP)____________1. stevieQ (GP)________________1. chiefsfan4ever (AOD)
2. MrBenn (VM)______________2. b00060 (SDF)________________2. smasher_123 (CCD)
3. dustin800 (AOD)____________3. vykingsfan64 (DTD)__________3. mwcc (TL)
4. BigBallinStalin (IB)__________4. lisbon101 (GWTW)___________4. jwithington (DTD)
5. mpjh (MVM)_______________5. talia-thomas (CCD)___________5. ViperOverLord (HL)
6. BoganGod (SSHG)__________6. Adow (HL)__________________6. DukeHazzard (DBC)
__________________________________________________________7. nesterdude (GWTW)

Not saying no, but hang on and continue playing as if I won't...I'll take a look at it here in a bit when I have a chance. Thanks for bringing it up.stevieQ wrote: Just a heads up that one of the heats on this map is terribly deadlocked Game 7783081. Is there an option of a tiebreaker with different settings?
Yes, you are...whitestazn88 is a freemium, so I only send one of his games out at a time. But I'm glad to see you're paying attention - players paying attention has saved me a couple of times when I've messed up.4 U 2 NV wrote: can you also check if all the games have been sent for 3,000m Steeplechase Prelim-Heat 3?
i think i am missing a game against whitestazn?
Draq, first please allow me to apologize for having just re-sent you the Triple Jump invitations again. I didn't see your post here in the tournament thread until after I did that, so I didn't realize you had intentionally declined them...I thought they had just "timed out" (for some reason, I didn't get the notifications like I do when they time out). Go ahead and decline them again and please accept my apologies for creating that work for you. I didn't mean to.Draq wrote:I just got invitations to 9 maps with two of them Conquerman and World 2.1 that´s all gonna be stalemate-parties with games taking forever. Is this really thought trough cause they very often ends up in stalemates even with escalating cards.
I, for one, would say everyone in the tournament should have realized that this tournament is going to take a long ass time to complete. That's one of my favourite aspects of this whole thing, that it's determined on the best representative events rather than the quickest way to find a winner.Woodruff wrote:Since I'm not particularly concerned about how long this tournament takes to complete, I don't at all mind games that are going to take a long time to complete. I would imagine that is the case for the players who have selected to play in this event.

Yeah I would have put a stop to this before if I knew I was signed up to this tournament.denominator wrote:I, for one, would say everyone in the tournament should have realized that this tournament is going to take a long ass time to complete. That's one of my favourite aspects of this whole thing, that it's determined on the best representative events rather than the quickest way to find a winner.Woodruff wrote:Since I'm not particularly concerned about how long this tournament takes to complete, I don't at all mind games that are going to take a long time to complete. I would imagine that is the case for the players who have selected to play in this event.
Hmmm...I'm disappointed that BoganGod signed you up without your acknowledgement. I guess I didn't expect something like that to happen.Draq wrote:Yeah I would have put a stop to this before if I knew I was signed up to this tournament.denominator wrote:I, for one, would say everyone in the tournament should have realized that this tournament is going to take a long ass time to complete. That's one of my favourite aspects of this whole thing, that it's determined on the best representative events rather than the quickest way to find a winner.Woodruff wrote:Since I'm not particularly concerned about how long this tournament takes to complete, I don't at all mind games that are going to take a long time to complete. I would imagine that is the case for the players who have selected to play in this event.

There is no rule regarding 80 rounds. If it goes past 80 rounds, then it goes past 80 rounds. That would likely NOT be to the benefit of the eventual winner though, so if someone is in a position where they can win the game, it would probably be in their interest to end it as quickly as possible.sonicsteve wrote:Hi Woodruff,
I'm struggling to find the piece in the rules about what happens to our throw distances when a stalemated game reaches round 80 - can you point me in the right direction?
Cheers.

I for one would be fine starting the next event.sonicsteve wrote:Thanks woodruff,
Having re-read the scoring system I understand why 80 rounds got mentioned now. The light has finally come on![]()
2011-01-23 14:44:23 - Woodruff: But since this is the Decathlon, we won't advance to the next Event until this one is completed.
Can't speak for all competitors, but I for one wouldn't object to starting on the next one, we're gonna be chucking shots for quite a while...

Normally, I would have no problem with it. However, we have two freemiums active in the current event still, so they won't be able to move on anyway.denominator wrote:I for one would be fine starting the next event.sonicsteve wrote:Thanks woodruff,
Having re-read the scoring system I understand why 80 rounds got mentioned now. The light has finally come on![]()
2011-01-23 14:44:23 - Woodruff: But since this is the Decathlon, we won't advance to the next Event until this one is completed.
Can't speak for all competitors, but I for one wouldn't object to starting on the next one, we're gonna be chucking shots for quite a while...