Moderator: Cartographers

What he said.Industrial Helix wrote:For the ships, what about significant European ship names in the discovery of the new world? Magellan circumnavigated the world in the Victoria. Columbus came in via the Niña. Those could be the Pacific and Atlantic ships respectively.
1) I would be more inclined to increase North Meso America by 1 - see point 3Tisha wrote:I changes the title, and the names of the ships.
what else?
1)Make South Meso-America 3?
2)what about where the two meso americas meet? draw a border right on the edge of the paper?
3)connect the Victoria to Tarascan?
4)neutrals on the boats and Nimiipuu?
well then I would wanna increase south by one also, since they both have three borders, and the south has one more territory than the north.isaiah40 wrote:Tisha wrote:I changes the title, and the names of the ships.
what else?
1)Make South Meso-America 3?
2)what about where the two meso americas meet? draw a border right on the edge of the paper?
3)connect the Victoria to Tarascan?
4)neutrals on the boats and Nimiipuu?
1) I would be more inclined to increase North Meso America by 1 - see point 3![]()
2)I'd say draw the line on the edge of the paper to divide the two meso americas to avoid any confusion.
3)Yes connect the Victoria to Tarascan.
4)2 neutrals on the boats and 3 on Nimiipuu.

Yes, but the Niña was his favorite.MrBenn wrote:"On August 3, 1492, Christopher Columbus set sail from Spain with three small Spanish sailing ships, the Pinta, the Niña, and the Santa María"
the Nina is the only one that made the complete trip.. he started out on the Santa Maria..Industrial Helix wrote:Yes, but the Niña was his favorite.MrBenn wrote:"On August 3, 1492, Christopher Columbus set sail from Spain with three small Spanish sailing ships, the Pinta, the Niña, and the Santa María"
So i still vote call it the Niña or find an image with 3 ships and call it the Niña, the Pinta and the Santa María.

You shouldn;t need to draw a border at all; if you want to enhance it, just add slightly more shadow where the pages overlap. This should be more than sufficient.Tisha wrote:what about where the two meso americas meet? draw a border right on the edge of the paper?
Actually, I would suggest reverting back to something almost like you had originally for the connections on the Pacific ocean side of the map. With the proximity of the connections across both sides of the map, the Meso-Americas become even more of a bottle neck; having the cross-map connections converging in the middle sort-of defeats the point of adding them in the first place?isaiah40 wrote:3)Yes connect the Victoria to Tarascan.Tisha wrote: 3)connect the Victoria to Tarascan?
4)neutrals on the boats and Nimiipuu?


MrBenn wrote: Actually, I would suggest reverting back to something almost like you had originally for the connections on the Pacific ocean side of the map. With the proximity of the connections across both sides of the map, the Meso-Americas become even more of a bottle neck; having the cross-map connections converging in the middle sort-of defeats the point of adding them in the first place?
If the path across the sea is redrawn to go beneath the bird and around it to the left, then it would be a better approximation of actual established sea trading routes. I'd take the path from Diaguita to Romo to reflect actual sailing routes:
Victor Sullivan wrote:3. For the title, might I suggest "First Nations of the Americas"? That way it will be next to the other two First Nations maps in the game finder.
Thanks, IH, just in case she didn't get it the first time, lol...Industrial Helix wrote:Also... the title seems strange to me. What about simply "First Nations of the Americas."
Okay I see what Mr.Benn is talking about now.MrBenn wrote:Actually, I would suggest reverting back to something almost like you had originally for the connections on the Pacific ocean side of the map. With the proximity of the connections across both sides of the map, the Meso-Americas become even more of a bottle neck; having the cross-map connections converging in the middle sort-of defeats the point of adding them in the first place?
Or you can do what he saidYou shouldn;t need to draw a border at all; if you want to enhance it, just add slightly more shadow where the pages overlap. This should be more than sufficient.
yes, I doisaiah40 wrote:Okay I see what Mr.Benn is talking about now.MrBenn wrote:Actually, I would suggest reverting back to something almost like you had originally for the connections on the Pacific ocean side of the map. With the proximity of the connections across both sides of the map, the Meso-Americas become even more of a bottle neck; having the cross-map connections converging in the middle sort-of defeats the point of adding them in the first place?
Or you can do what he saidYou shouldn;t need to draw a border at all; if you want to enhance it, just add slightly more shadow where the pages overlap. This should be more than sufficient.![]()
This is just a nit pick - do you need your name on both halves? Doesn't matter either way.
Tisha wrote:two connections from Victoria? Maybe just Chumash and Chimu?
Having the connecting territories further apart makes the Meso-Americas slightly more defensible, and a better place to start. Diaguita in the South and Pomo in the North would be suitableMrBenn wrote: I'd take the path from Diaguita to Romo to reflect actual sailing routes:


jakewilliams wrote:I came.
