CCdoku (sudoku) Update 8- small version, changed colors

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 4:24 pm

update 8-

do u like it?

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 4:25 pm

make one more bonus a diagonal bonus for the bonus of 9

and call it ccdoku instead of ccudoku because the u doesn't sound good

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 4:39 pm

what about now?

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:34 pm

comments plz!

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:43 pm

it al looks a bit crappy to me

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:46 pm

Wisse wrote:it al looks a bit crappy to me

lol thanks, what bit don't u like?

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:48 pm

i meant, it is all wicth no spaces between it (i called that crappy my mistake, sorry) it looks to bussy

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:52 pm

so much like crossword. :-k

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:55 pm

wicked wrote:so much like crossword.

i have never played crossword...

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:58 pm

update,

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:59 pm

can you tell what you updated? than we can see it better

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 6:00 pm

the legend down the right side is straighter, nothing big :wink:

steve monkey · Post by **steve monkey** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 6:01 pm

I just don't think this map has playability. What would be its appeal? Crossword is the least played map on the site, I don't see this being any more popular than that.

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 6:02 pm

i would play this, this map looks great

Balsiefen · Post by **Balsiefen** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 6:07 pm

somehow i dont like maps that use codes instead of terretory names, i just dont like attaking from E1 to F7, its also very annoying when you get the wrong plase because you attacked blue E instead of blue f

Danelle · Post by **Danelle** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 8:43 pm

I really like this - I would play it for sure

PimpCaneYoAss · Post by **PimpCaneYoAss** » Sat Mar 24, 2007 10:13 pm

Seems cool. I dont know how you could increase playability though. Theres no way to include impassable barriers...

As of now though i give it a 7 out of 10 because of playability

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:24 am

yeah it looks bad playabilaty but it will not b that bad cause with every1 going 4 the indervidual bonuses and not breaking others, any other advice?

*spin*

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:25 am

Balsiefen wrote:somehow i dont like maps that use codes instead of terretory names, i just dont like attaking from E1 to F7, its also very annoying when you get the wrong plase because you attacked blue E instead of blue f

neather do i but there is no was 2 change this

Teya · Post by **Teya** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:35 am

Id prefer to see the conquer 4 map completed than this one.
The maps are pretty much the same concept and I dont think there would be room for both.

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:36 am

Teya wrote:Id prefer to see the conquer 4 map completed than this one.
The maps are pretty much the same concept and I dont think there would be room for both.

i prefer see them both completed

Teya · Post by **Teya** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:40 am

they are so similar when it comes down to it though. And There is such an increase of abstract maps that I dont think 2 practically the same would be good.

Wisse · Post by **Wisse** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:42 am

Teya wrote:they are so similar when it comes down to it though. And There is such an increase of abstract maps that I dont think 2 practically the same would be good.

it is not so similair the strategy is much difference and the looks too

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:09 am

Teya wrote:Id prefer to see the conquer 4 map completed than this one.
The maps are pretty much the same concept and I dont think there would be room for both.

i like that map 2 but this offers something different, is any1 going 2 tell me how 2 improve???

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:09 am

Wisse wrote:
Teya wrote:they are so similar when it comes down to it though. And There is such an increase of abstract maps that I dont think 2 practically the same would be good.

it is not so similair the strategy is much difference and the looks too

thanks wisse, nice 2 know u are not ripping appart both my maps