[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Funkyterrance and Beckie121 have done a secret alliance to beat the other players of the game 8411928.
The proof: Funkyterrance never attacked Beckie121 (Funky have chinesse empire and Beckie121 Japanese empire). Funkyterrance only attacked me, and Beckie121 only attacked Noodliser on africa.
This just looks to me like poor sportsmanship. One person said that you and another person were in a secret alliance and then you accuse that person of being in an alliance with the same other person. (TLDR for people who don't want to go to the link)
I think that Funky say that Noodliser and me were in a secret alliance because he wanted to disturb the game and make Beckie121 attack Noodliser and be sure that Beckie121 don't attack the funky bonus of the chinesse empire so it's like a "public - secret" alliance.
parra wrote:I think that Funky say that Noodliser and me were in a secret alliance because he wanted to disturb the game and make Beckie121 attack Noodliser and be sure that Beckie121 don't attack the funky bonus of the chinesse empire so it's like a "public - secret" alliance.
The highlighted makes absolutely no sense. An alliance is either public or it's secret. Not both.
I said it's a "public - secret" alliance because that is something that practically said in the public chat of the game but have not been determinated.
