Read page 1 for instructionswhosane wrote:8456197 whosane won
8456199 whosane won
8456201 whosane lost
Basically wait til round 2 starts now...
Moderator: Tournament Directors
Read page 1 for instructionswhosane wrote:8456197 whosane won
8456199 whosane won
8456201 whosane lost
A lot. Almost all of them.kylegraves1 wrote:how many players are advancing to round 2?




Tviorr wrote:Well actually about 80 % only. - Maybe a little less. If you count the players that signed up but never did anything else as participating, the "advancing" percentage comes down further.
Should this rate continue, we will be below 1000 players after round 4. Likely the advancing percentage will rise some for the following rounds as there will be only a few players that miss out due to complete inactivity. - However some freemiums at least will be pressed to get all 3 games in, so that will still drain the player pool some. I think its likely that we will go below 1000 players after round 4 even with a higher advancing percentage. Maybe only just, though.
So yeah, we gotta be in it for the long haul (assuming we advance), but its by no means a never-ending prospect. 12 rounds should see us going below 200 players with reasonable probability. That should probably happen this year.
Im having loads of fun, so I dont mind being here a while, though.
It would be a simple search if you were looking for a specific person. However, there are lots of CC mods/admins/etc., which makes for a lot of simple searches. And when you're running a tournament with >2000 people, it saves quite a bit of time to have folks post in the thread.Riskismy wrote:Can someone please explain to me why it's necessary to actually post that you have beat a CC dignitary or notable or what ever you call them?
I mean, shouldn't it be enough to just beat them?
Finding out who did so first, shouldn't be more than a matter of a simple search.
Thank you.
This medal was for the first person to win against a team cc member and post. Just a quick fun medal that has already been won by rodion.Riskismy wrote:Can someone please explain to me why it's necessary to actually post that you have beat a CC dignitary or notable or what ever you call them?
I mean, shouldn't it be enough to just beat them?
Finding out who did so first, shouldn't be more than a matter of a simple search.
Thank you.
The player that joins four games would be eliminated but the player playing his three games would advance if he won one game even if that was the game he won.Rodion wrote:If someone joins 4 games and loses the 4th, what happens to the player that wins this 4th game (someone else's 4th, their 1st/2nd/3rd)?

Chariot of Fire wrote:What happens if someone (Player A) joins a 4th game, wins it, and that game was the 3rd lost game in the same round for his opponent (Player B)?
Does that mean Player A is DQ'd for joining too many games, and Player B is also out for losing 3 games in that round (despite the 3rd game being lost to an ineligible player)?