Victor Sullivan wrote:What I do still find distracting is the contrast between HL and pretty much all the other colors of the bonus areas - it stands out way too much for me. I'd say make it paler, less dark. Also, the white lines (for lack of a better description) in MBL could stand to have lower opacity, they stand out a lot more there than anywhere else.
Anyways, just my humble opinion. Take what you will.
Victor, I know I've turned down a lot of your suggestions lately, and I don't want you to feel like I'm snubbing you... it's just that sometimes you don't seem to grasp the priorities of graphical design in maps. But hey, you're still a bit new at this, and we all have to start somewhere, right? Don't take this the wrong way though.
In this case, your suggestion to change the colours based on that you think the colours should be more uniform is a bit misguided. The main priority for choosing colours is a utilitarian view: the colours need to be visible and clear, for colourblind people as well as everyone else. For Antarctica, the colours have been carefully choosed to be distinguishable for both of the most common colourblindness types, and they even work with Tritanopy... so any further changes to them would be counter-productive.
As for the texture standing out more in MBL, it is natural for textures to be more prominent on darker areas. I think it's cool that they show better there. Gives the map some flavor. If an overwhelming consensus arises that this should be changed, then I'll look for other solutions, but as of now I feel it should stay as is.
So, here's with another dropshadow fix. I think this is the best I can do for them.
- Click image to enlarge.

- Click image to enlarge.
