Moderator: Community Team
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.

Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Commander9 wrote:I will save some time, so here goes.
First of all, the main reason for me being extremely aggressive: I've got a minor character with a minor role, so I'd rather attract the attention of the scum and town rather than expose the important power roles. If I'm taking heat, am aggressive then that leaves other characters free to do their job.
I've never heard of him before, but thanks to Iliad and google, I now know who Scott Hope is. I am basically her boyfriend during most of season 3, but in the end up breaking up with her as I can't stand her behaviour and life style.
I can't really say anything else to convince you that I am pro-town. As far as I am concerned, I think I've done well for the most part and I still think that the bw on TWO had every good reason to be there. Now it's up to the jury to decide what to do.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Nice skimming herenaxus wrote:Good job there. Not like it took a few other claims for you to let us in on your plan.
Vote Com9
Commander9 wrote:Nice skimming herenaxus wrote:Good job there. Not like it took a few other claims for you to let us in on your plan.
Vote Com9Perhaps you would be interested in checking out how much of those I actually influenced?
So you not being an influence is you drawing attention to yourself?Commander9 wrote: so I'd rather attract the attention of the scum and town rather than expose the important power roles.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Err, can you rephrase the question, because this doesn't make any sense?naxus wrote:So you not being an influence is you drawing attention to yourself?

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.

No he hasn't stated his abilities. Like he said minor abilities. I don't think that implies VT.safariguy5 wrote:So if I'm interpreting Commander right, he's basically claiming a VT role. Not doing that much to make me want to reconsider my vote.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
By all meens, let's split votes. Anark and Commander have acted scummy. Anark claimed Angel (a major, possibly Mafia-recruited character), Commander claimed Scot Hope (a cameo douche). Math says: Let's lynch oommander 1st, see that he is Faith and then lynch Anark. tt does not say: let's do whatever we can to prolong, pospone and, if possible, avoid having to lynch anyone.edocsil wrote:No he hasn't stated his abilities. Like he said minor abilities. I don't think that implies VT.safariguy5 wrote:So if I'm interpreting Commander right, he's basically claiming a VT role. Not doing that much to make me want to reconsider my vote.
Honestly unvote Vote Anark Try to lynch Buffy is right out. She is good and there is no real question about that. She has dark moments, but nothing like your own inherit evil. You have a soul, that leaves you with remorse but it does not absolve the dangers you present two the town.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
I have a tendency to do that.strike wolf wrote:Naxus popping up out of the ground yesterday strikes me a bit odd (he had posted on Wednesday but before that had been inactive for a week).
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
No, I did not claim. Since I don't think anything I say will make you believe me, you may as well hammer me. Gg all.safariguy5 wrote:So if I'm interpreting Commander right, he's basically claiming a VT role. Not doing that much to make me want to reconsider my vote.
Boy, playing against this time sure has spoiled you if you think that no one is going to notice that you contradict your own post. You kind of remind me of the ex-Prime Minister of Croatia (and currently a prisoner in Austria) who used to get away with the same kind of contradictory statements (he was also playing Scum against a really slow bunch of townies). Of course, I'm know that, unlike him, you are not scummy in RL, just for game purposes.Commander9 wrote:I've never heard of him before, but thanks to Iliad and google, I now know who Scott Hope is. I am basically her boyfriend during most of season 3, but in the end up breaking up with her as I can't stand her behaviour and life style.
I just substituted last night, cup-cake, and someone has bus-driven Nark with whoever is playing Anya, according to Illiad's Scene. So, to answer your question, no Townies yet, but I may have been lucky enough to prevent an event that would be bad for town.ga7 wrote:Geez... I was kinda expecting Mandy to be buffy if town as his act felt like the typical noob who gets a main character and feels untouchable in his misguided ways. To think he's a vig too makes me cringe, say Mandy which townies did you kill so far? [/color][/b]

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
EBWOP.Commander9 wrote:No, I did not claim VT role. Since I don't think anything I say will make you believe me, you may as well hammer me. Gg all.safariguy5 wrote:So if I'm interpreting Commander right, he's basically claiming a VT role. Not doing that much to make me want to reconsider my vote.
Right, confused. Do you know if whoever you replaced is responsible for one of the n1 kills though? I was thinking we could have a SK but it'd be nice to know the contrary.mandalorian2298 wrote:I just substituted last night, cup-cake, and someone has bus-driven Nark with whoever is playing Anya, according to Illiad's Scene. So, to answer your question, no Townies yet, but I may have been lucky enough to prevent an event that would be bad for town.
The much more interesting question is who I'm gonna NK in the Nights to follow? I feel like a bloodthirsty kid in a candy store.
I take it as a blatant defense. Not even reading that much into it, the "providing explanations for the scum about to be lynched" and "let's try another wagon" just after Commie claimed... Notice the bolded "honestly". This can imply a lot on the if you consider his previous actions. Ok I'll stop thereedocsil wrote:No he hasn't stated his abilities. Like he said minor abilities. I don't think that implies VT.safariguy5 wrote:So if I'm interpreting Commander right, he's basically claiming a VT role. Not doing that much to make me want to reconsider my vote.
Honestly unvote Vote Anark Try to lynch Buffy is right out. She is good and there is no real question about that. She has dark moments, but nothing like your own inherit evil. You have a soul, that leaves you with remorse but it does not absolve the dangers you present two the town.
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
That claim, a "fairly strong town claim" was not.Commander9 wrote: If you can answer this, I'll claim - lets make a hypothetical scenario: I get a couple more votes and I claim under pressure a fairly strong town claim where no one can counter it or rebute it. Then what? We go after Mandy - and what if he also does that? We have ousted 2 townies already and *possible* 2 more are on the line - we're getting close to mass claiming, which I personally absolutely despise. I can easily claim if most of you want it, but I don't think it will help the town one bit...
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Ionno, Commander's little "gg all" statement looks to me like he's been pretty well outed and resigned to his fate.edocsil wrote:Meh, I do not like how Mandy is controlling everything here, it stinks. He reminds me of Pimpdave when it comes to Commander. Some little thing sets him on the path against Com and then purposefully twists everything that he says to make it look far worse then it ever was. Both Mandy and Strike should know full well what Commander meant by his half claim, yet point fingers at his "Lies". This is why I do not join the wagon, I still have suspicions about Commander like many of you, but I do not believe in blindly following a lynch that is advocated by one or two members. If you want me to simply post in this form once or twice a week and follow the current wagon, well something is deeply wrong with that scenario.
