Moderator: Community Team
Its frightening as it gets, not just because of the loss of life possible, but the ramifications of what could be some of the best constructed nuclear plants in the world, not being adequate.angola wrote:This isn't an AP News Alert you want to see come across the wire:
TOKYO (AP) — Japan nuclear safety commission official says meltdown at nuclear power plant possible
Wow, only 574 dead so far. It's sad they died, but it seems like that number would be much higher if Japan wasn't so well prepared for such a disaster.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
No it didn't.
The death toll is unfortunately much higher.pimpdave wrote:Wow, only 574 dead so far. It's sad they died, but it seems like that number would be much higher if Japan wasn't so well prepared for such a disaster.
It's a good thing they don't have the Tea Party over there, trying to dismantle government and get their own people killed. Bravo Japan, your hard work and rigorous building codes have saved many lives.
at least 574 people dead by official count.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
I fully agree that Nuclear Reactors and all such dangerous businesses and utilities absolutely need government oversight, and even agree that the fact that even the Japanese reactors are having problems after an earthquake and tsunami can serve as a painful reminder of this. I simply think it is far too early and in very bad taste to start in with any political discussion of it.pimpdave wrote:at least 574 people dead by official count.
That's from the article. It also says that local media is reporting that the death toll is possibly as high as 1,300. I really hope it isn't.
But the fact remains, Japan has done a great job mitigating the danger to their populace, including a huge (and expensive) early warning system for quakes and tsunamis. The death toll would be much higher if they had a shitty government that hadn't been so well prepared.
Considering all of the ways a group like the Tea Party is trying to dismantle our infrastructure, it's only natural one would think about what would happen if something similar hit us.
"If this accident stops right now it will already be one of the three worst accidents we have ever had at a nuclear power plant in the history of nuclear power," said Joseph Cirincione, an expert on nuclear materials and president of the U.S.-based Ploughshares Fund, a firm involved in security and peace funding.
Ah yeah, gonna have a radiated sauna bath in the moonlight two weeks from now in Mongolia, amirite?Queen_Herpes wrote:Partial meltdown. And they released radiated steam. This reactor is on the east coast of Japan. Where will all of this fallout land? hmmmmmmmmm????
This accident is horrible. Still, it cannot be emphasized enough that the damage would have been far greater had Japan not been prepared.AAFitz wrote:The death toll is unfortunately much higher.pimpdave wrote:Wow, only 574 dead so far. It's sad they died, but it seems like that number would be much higher if Japan wasn't so well prepared for such a disaster.
I agree, and quite frankly it is amazing how well they fared the quake itself all things considered, only to be hit by the tsunami afterward which has done the majority of the damage. Its far too early for speculation, but one preliminary report suggested there were as many as 9000 people missing from one town. That is not a solid number at all, and do not accept it at face value one bit, but the mere fact it is possible, is depressing on the grandest scale.PLAYER57832 wrote:This accident is horrible. Still, it cannot be emphasized enough that the damage would have been far greater had Japan not been prepared.AAFitz wrote:The death toll is unfortunately much higher.pimpdave wrote:Wow, only 574 dead so far. It's sad they died, but it seems like that number would be much higher if Japan wasn't so well prepared for such a disaster.
Also, some may not realize, but the Richter scale is logorythmic. That means that an 8.1 is twice as large as an 8.0 quake.
An 8.9 is almost 10 times as large as an 8.0... And the Loma Prieta quake, (the one that hit SF during the world series) was only a 7.3.
I think I read somewhere that the earthquake took out the main power/cooling system and the tsunami took out the back-up, but don't quote me on that.AAFitz wrote:I agree, and quite frankly it is amazing how well they fared the quake itself all things considered, only to be hit by the tsunami afterward which has done the majority of the damage.PLAYER57832 wrote:This accident is horrible. Still, it cannot be emphasized enough that the damage would have been far greater had Japan not been prepared.AAFitz wrote:The death toll is unfortunately much higher.pimpdave wrote:Wow, only 574 dead so far. It's sad they died, but it seems like that number would be much higher if Japan wasn't so well prepared for such a disaster.
Also, some may not realize, but the Richter scale is logorythmic. That means that an 8.1 is twice as large as an 8.0 quake.
An 8.9 is almost 10 times as large as an 8.0... And the Loma Prieta quake, (the one that hit SF during the world series) was only a 7.3.
One thing Im not clear on is if the majority of the damage to the reactors is from the earthquake itself, or the tsunami. I assume both played a part, and perhaps they arent even sure themselves, but was it the earthquake that knocked out the power which is leading to the problems or the tsunami with smashed them afterward?
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Worry. Every state in the union has had quakes.. and while the edges (CA. etc.) are more prone, the worst quakes tend to happen mid-continent. The geologic record seems to show a massive one in Kansas, I forget how many thousand years ago, that some say was the biggest ever.AAFitz wrote: I was withing 10 miles of a reactor just last night, and while the statistical risk of an earthquake in this region is very low, it was still unnerving to realize that if Japans were in jeopardy, there is probably reason to assume ours may be as well.
I am fairly certain it would be the earthquake. I could be wrong, though. My knowledge is basicaly limited to having toured a few reactors in CA (Diablo Canyon,etc) when they had public open houses.AAFitz wrote:One thing I'm not entirely clear on, though I'm sure I could track it down, is if the majority of the damage to the reactors is from the earthquake itself, or the tsunami. I assume both played a part, and perhaps they aren't even sure themselves, but was it the earthquake that knocked out the power which is leading to the problems or the tsunami which smashed them afterward?
What was offensive and off topic about mine?PLAYER57832 wrote:What was offensive and off topic about my post?pimpdave wrote:Oh, so Fitz, you call me a piece of shit but not Player?
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
No, I'M completely fucked. The rest of you will have a chance.JPcelticfc wrote:its not earthquakes the US has to worry about!! Its yellowstone!!
If it goes off were all complety fucked!!