Moderator: Community Team
W I F O MTheFissk wrote: the scum will try there hardest to get me removed. you can help them or not. your choice.
He didn't do anything right, though.Army of GOD wrote:Guys, Fissk did nothing wrong, get off his back.
FOS jimfinn and evilchaos for bandwagonning

Army of GOD wrote:FOS freezie for defending those two. I'm really curious as to if they're all working together...

Army of GOD wrote:FOS freezie for defending those two. I'm really curious as to if they're all working together...
As you can see, I haven't been "working with freezie." We both saw a suspicious person and mentioned it. If you use that logic, then everyone who ever questioned Fissk is scum. Hey, it's a majority. We won!evilchaos wrote:Very well. Sorry for breaking up your discussion of a separate game.nagerous wrote:Wow, spam much? Can we get back to the mafia? If you want to randomly talk pokemon you should do it in OT or something.
Vote freezie. I'm sure this vote won't pass (nor should it in Day 1), but I find it fishy that freezie claimed the one role that makes it impossible for us to figure him out for sure if he is in fact scum. Especially at the very beginning of Day 1, before any discussion about anything had begun. I would assume that he would know this act is suspicious, and this is definitely a WIFOM situation, but in the end I don't believe that a miller would announce themselves at the beginning of Day 1 when they aren't in immediate danger of being "found out."
Army of GOD wrote:Guys, Fissk did nothing wrong, get off his back.
FOS jimfinn and evilchaos for bandwagonning
Alright. I'm convinced that AOG and Fissk have characters that are somehow linked. Be it by lovers, best friends, masons, mafia, or maybe some other third party. This blind I must defend fissk attitude seems pretty proving of this. The question will certainly be which though. I guess we'll find out when fissk claims though. If fissk turns out to be scum I know who I'll be looking into on day 2 though. Actually if fissk is scum I guess a cop checking out AOG could be helpful. Unless we feel that there would be enough evidence not to waste the cop investigation on AOG and try one of the other suspicious parties like hank or jonty.Army of GOD wrote:FOS freezie for defending those two. I'm really curious as to if they're all working together...
I'm Onix, a Lyncher. basically I'm looking for a Pokemon, once i've found him/her, i've got to try me hardest to get him lynched, i win if i make to the end and he doesn'tRodion wrote:Fissk, I think it's time for you to roleclaim.

Can you explain how Onix is a lyncher? I don't see how Brock's Pokemon is considered a lyncher. Onix isn't normally associated with such things.TheFissk wrote:I'm Onix, a Lyncher. basically I'm looking for a Pokemon, once i've found him/her, i've got to try me hardest to get him lynched, i win if i make to the end and he doesn'tRodion wrote:Fissk, I think it's time for you to roleclaim.
I think it was L-3 last time someone went and counted.nagerous wrote:Alright mod, let's see a vote count - I know fissk is quite near being lynched now.
That is correct. Typically he wins immediately after the lynchee is lynched.Streaker wrote:Just finished rereading, and I'm willing to let my vote slip here due to being new. I know the feeling. Still, at that time it was enough to warrant my vote.
Unvote
About fissk's claim. Sneaky sneaky I must say. I don't think that's how lynchers WC works. Fissk cleary states that, for him to win, he has to be alive at endgame and his target has to be dead.
A lyncher has to LYNCH his target, and WINS when that happens.
Any thoughts on this? FoS Fissk (vote count?)
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Yoshi said in his first post that he would provide fake claims if anyone was unfamiliar with the setting. We can't really count on a counterclaim in this game.shieldgenerator7 wrote:At least Fissk didn't claim VT, as Yoshi said there were no VTs. So from that point of view Fissk is telling the truth.
However odd his role sounds, he may be lying or telling the turth, we can't say for sure. And pokemon aren't easily associated with any mafia roles. My pokemon doesn't seem to fit his role either, but it is what it is. Since we can't tell easily as to whether his pokemon would fit the role, I think we should wait and see if any one counterclaims him. (does yoshi give mafia fake claims?)
I find myself satisfied with Fissk's defense only because he's new. But beware, Fissk, next time your defense needs to be a step up. I'll let you go for now, but if someone legitamately counterclaims or you do something else scummy, I might vote you. Just be cautious, and post with your brain.
Besides, there are 151 1st generation pokémon. Add human beings. Add other generations. You don't really need a fake claim if any pokémon you guess has a huge chance of not being counterclaimed (because there are so many).evilchaos wrote:Yoshi said in his first post that he would provide fake claims if anyone was unfamiliar with the setting. We can't really count on a counterclaim in this game.shieldgenerator7 wrote:At least Fissk didn't claim VT, as Yoshi said there were no VTs. So from that point of view Fissk is telling the truth.
However odd his role sounds, he may be lying or telling the turth, we can't say for sure. And pokemon aren't easily associated with any mafia roles. My pokemon doesn't seem to fit his role either, but it is what it is. Since we can't tell easily as to whether his pokemon would fit the role, I think we should wait and see if any one counterclaims him. (does yoshi give mafia fake claims?)
I find myself satisfied with Fissk's defense only because he's new. But beware, Fissk, next time your defense needs to be a step up. I'll let you go for now, but if someone legitamately counterclaims or you do something else scummy, I might vote you. Just be cautious, and post with your brain.
So either AOG is truly just blindly defending fissk or fissk lied in his claim and they are mafia together. The next question that rises for me is why is AOG just blindly defending fissk if fissk is telling the truth? I'm going to keep my vote on AOG because I'm quite suspicious of him right now.kratos644 wrote:Army of GOD wrote:Guys, Fissk did nothing wrong, get off his back.
FOS jimfinn and evilchaos for bandwagonningAlright. I'm convinced that AOG and Fissk have characters that are somehow linked. Be it by lovers, best friends, masons, mafia, or maybe some other third party. This blind I must defend fissk attitude seems pretty proving of this. The question will certainly be which though. I guess we'll find out when fissk claims though. If fissk turns out to be scum I know who I'll be looking into on day 2 though. Actually if fissk is scum I guess a cop checking out AOG could be helpful. Unless we feel that there would be enough evidence not to waste the cop investigation on AOG and try one of the other suspicious parties like hank or jonty.Army of GOD wrote:FOS freezie for defending those two. I'm really curious as to if they're all working together...
Yes. This is true and would still fit with why AOG is defending fissk so hard if he is a mafia lyncher and AOG is in the mafia, too.freezie wrote:a lyncher isnt exactly a pro-town role, though..
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.