lalaland wrote:
I'm still confused about this self-imposed PR, although I suppose it doesn't really matter in the scheme of things?
And 40k, I don't see how it's a bad thing that I'm asking questions and trying to fully understand what people are saying here. It's helping us understand the structure of the game more fully, and make sure that we aren't making hasty decision on who to/not to lynch.
Self impossed PR's are just more for flavor then anything else. I personally have nothing to hide nor any major role in the game thus I play out the character. Most players won't do it often as as it does paint a target on you. But most peeps who have seen the show know who I am and know I'm no threat either, so why the hell not. Unless you think my alter ego will in fact be able to flood the world with a garden hose or destroy the ozone layer with a box of aerosol cans.
evilchaos wrote:That reaction was incredibly interesting. Why do you jump to the conclusion that I'm a player that might be anti-town and then basically FoS me for no reason? It was a 50:50 chance. Why choose Cartman?
FoS 40k
I'm not going to fully claim yet. There is no reason to. I've prevented us going off on a tangent, which is fairly good proof that I'm pro-town. I said what I did to keep us on track.
We know who the 2 0f the 4 main characters are, I assumed your cartmen. what dose FOS mean?
Why not assume Kyle? Are you Kyle or do you know who Kyle is?
evilchaos wrote:That reaction was incredibly interesting. Why do you jump to the conclusion that I'm a player that might be anti-town and then basically FoS me for no reason? It was a 50:50 chance. Why choose Cartman?
FoS 40k
I'm not going to fully claim yet. There is no reason to. I've prevented us going off on a tangent, which is fairly good proof that I'm pro-town. I said what I did to keep us on track.
We know who the 2 0f the 4 main characters are, I assumed your cartmen. what dose FOS mean?
Why not assume Kyle? Are you Kyle or do you know who Kyle is?
FoS = Finger of Suspicion.
my gut tells me your not kyle.
16:00:18 ‹Pixar› Valentines Day the one day in they year that the V and the D come together
I'm still puzzled as to why DoomYoshi and evilchaos received that message from Chef about Cartman, or why Chef would announce to Cartman that he's coming after him.
And the way the message was worded sounded like it's from a newer player.
evilchaos wrote:Chef wrote:
I have been told I have an opportunity to say something to you at night - so I am using it. Hi! Cartman, you fatface, I'm coming after you!
So yeah, what's the point of this message? And not only does this character send out a message, but we're assuming that he makes people voteless as well. Something doesn't sit right here.
Ok, three people recieved a message from chef in a game with this few players and it can make you voteless?!?! I call BS, one of the three of you is lying and I think we have are targets to pressure for the day. I find it very hard believe anyone in such a small game gets that much power to control what people are doing. Something here is definitely up. So, who wants to come clean? Or, are we going to pressure one of you until you claim?
T-This just seems awful fishy guys. I don't much care for it, n-not one bit.
Talapus wrote:Ok, three people recieved a message from chef in a game with this few players and it can make you voteless?!?! I call BS, one of the three of you is lying and I think we have are targets to pressure for the day. I find it very hard believe anyone in such a small game gets that much power to control what people are doing. Something here is definitely up. So, who wants to come clean? Or, are we going to pressure one of you until you claim?
T-This just seems awful fishy guys. I don't much care for it, n-not one bit.
Im not lying, nor is chapcrap, I can back that up.
16:00:18 ‹Pixar› Valentines Day the one day in they year that the V and the D come together
Talapus wrote:Ok, three people recieved a message from chef in a game with this few players and it can make you voteless?!?! I call BS, one of the three of you is lying and I think we have are targets to pressure for the day. I find it very hard believe anyone in such a small game gets that much power to control what people are doing. Something here is definitely up. So, who wants to come clean? Or, are we going to pressure one of you until you claim?
T-This just seems awful fishy guys. I don't much care for it, n-not one bit.
Wait where lying about what? who we are?
16:00:18 ‹Pixar› Valentines Day the one day in they year that the V and the D come together
evilchaos wrote:That reaction was incredibly interesting. Why do you jump to the conclusion that I'm a player that might be anti-town and then basically FoS me for no reason? It was a 50:50 chance. Why choose Cartman?
FoS 40k
I'm not going to fully claim yet. There is no reason to. I've prevented us going off on a tangent, which is fairly good proof that I'm pro-town. I said what I did to keep us on track.
We know who the 2 0f the 4 main characters are, I assumed your cartmen. what dose FOS mean?
Why not assume Kyle? Are you Kyle or do you know who Kyle is?
FoS = Finger of Suspicion.
my gut tells me your not kyle.
My gut is in agony from the terrible soup. Never use your gut to determine who you think is mafia or not. I would totally vote you if I could.
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I don't think all of them are voteless, just Saf. He got soup, while the others got a message.
-Tails
As far as I know, I'm the only one voteless, roleblocked for night 2, and with a pr temporarily.
And frankly, I was the first to post the message, so it almost gaurantees that I actually received it (unless I magically typed out the exact message that others received). The others may or may not be lying, I'm not sure.
evilchaos wrote:And frankly, I was the first to post the message, so it almost gaurantees that I actually received it (unless I magically typed out the exact message that others received). The others may or may not be lying, I'm not sure.
Trust me, if I weren't voteless, I'd be voting for 40k right now.
evilchaos wrote:And frankly, I was the first to post the message, so it almost gaurantees that I actually received it (unless I magically typed out the exact message that others received). The others may or may not be lying, I'm not sure.
Trust me, if I weren't voteless, I'd be voting for 40k right now.
your going to be investigated tonight.
16:00:18 ‹Pixar› Valentines Day the one day in they year that the V and the D come together
evilchaos wrote:And frankly, I was the first to post the message, so it almost gaurantees that I actually received it (unless I magically typed out the exact message that others received). The others may or may not be lying, I'm not sure.
Trust me, if I weren't voteless, I'd be voting for 40k right now.
your going to be investigated tonight.
How? You said earlier you can only interview, not investigate.
evilchaos wrote:And frankly, I was the first to post the message, so it almost gaurantees that I actually received it (unless I magically typed out the exact message that others received). The others may or may not be lying, I'm not sure.
Trust me, if I weren't voteless, I'd be voting for 40k right now.
your going to be investigated tonight.
How? You said earlier you can only interview, not investigate.
I don't think he really knows what he's saying. I believe that he's Stan and if so that makes him town, but maybe we should just lynch him (joking...mostly).
Here's why I asked 40k about the message: I received it too. When evil said that he was one of the boys and I realized that he got it, I got it, and yoshi got it. That means that Chef sent it to the 4 of us boys. Except the weird part is that 40k said he had just received it instead of receiving it earlier like the rest of us did.
So, I think that 40k, evil, yoshi, and saf are all town.
evilchaos wrote:And frankly, I was the first to post the message, so it almost gaurantees that I actually received it (unless I magically typed out the exact message that others received). The others may or may not be lying, I'm not sure.
Trust me, if I weren't voteless, I'd be voting for 40k right now.
your going to be investigated tonight.
If you give away who you're going to investigate, you set the mafia up perfectly to frame me if they have a framer. So you would get the guilty result and no matter how much I protest my innocence, I'm probably going to get mislynched tomorrow due to mafia framing me. I'm fine with investigating me, but telling it publicly is as bad an idea as the soup I had.
Here's the thing. 40k said he was Stan and could interview someone. Now he says he's going to investigate someone, like a cop. It appears he's changing around what he states his role is, in my opinion. I would like an explanation as to what your last post meant 40k.
evilchaos wrote:Here's the thing. 40k said he was Stan and could interview someone. Now he says he's going to investigate someone, like a cop. It appears he's changing around what he states his role is, in my opinion. I would like an explanation as to what your last post meant 40k.
Interview and investigate are a lot alike. He probably meant investigate/interrogate/interview. I think it was probably a slip.
40k, whatever your ability is, you should probably use it on someone other than safari. Of course, maybe he's smarter than he's acting and he was just trying to set a framer up to frame you and then investigate someone else. Who knows?
Either way, let's focus on someone else please (other than 40k and safari). How about kratos or Commander9? Anyone think they're scummy?
evilchaos wrote:Here's the thing. 40k said he was Stan and could interview someone. Now he says he's going to investigate someone, like a cop. It appears he's changing around what he states his role is, in my opinion. I would like an explanation as to what your last post meant 40k.
Interview and investigate are a lot alike. He probably meant investigate/interrogate/interview. I think it was probably a slip.
40k, whatever your ability is, you should probably use it on someone other than safari. Of course, maybe he's smarter than he's acting and he was just trying to set a framer up to frame you and then investigate someone else. Who knows?
Either way, let's focus on someone else please (other than 40k and safari). How about kratos or Commander9? Anyone think they're scummy?
Why don't you want us to even question 40k? No harm can come from asking questions. This sounds incredibly scummy to me. You are literally throwing out random names to prevent us from asking questions of suspicious people, without offering any cases/analysis/etc.
evilchaos wrote:Here's the thing. 40k said he was Stan and could interview someone. Now he says he's going to investigate someone, like a cop. It appears he's changing around what he states his role is, in my opinion. I would like an explanation as to what your last post meant 40k.
Interview and investigate are a lot alike. He probably meant investigate/interrogate/interview. I think it was probably a slip.
40k, whatever your ability is, you should probably use it on someone other than safari. Of course, maybe he's smarter than he's acting and he was just trying to set a framer up to frame you and then investigate someone else. Who knows?
Either way, let's focus on someone else please (other than 40k and safari). How about kratos or Commander9? Anyone think they're scummy?
Why don't you want us to even question 40k? No harm can come from asking questions. This sounds incredibly scummy to me. You are literally throwing out random names to prevent us from asking questions of suspicious people, without offering any cases/analysis/etc.
Unvote (if needed) vote chapcrap
evil, you are so ridiculous. You're on my good list too! I've already given the reasons multiple times. If you're too lazy to go back and look what I've said, that's not my fault.
I'm gonna go ahead and vote kratos until he gives me a reason not too.
evilchaos wrote:Here's the thing. 40k said he was Stan and could interview someone. Now he says he's going to investigate someone, like a cop. It appears he's changing around what he states his role is, in my opinion. I would like an explanation as to what your last post meant 40k.
Interview and investigate are a lot alike. He probably meant investigate/interrogate/interview. I think it was probably a slip.
40k, whatever your ability is, you should probably use it on someone other than safari. Of course, maybe he's smarter than he's acting and he was just trying to set a framer up to frame you and then investigate someone else. Who knows?
Either way, let's focus on someone else please (other than 40k and safari). How about kratos or Commander9? Anyone think they're scummy?
Why don't you want us to even question 40k? No harm can come from asking questions. This sounds incredibly scummy to me. You are literally throwing out random names to prevent us from asking questions of suspicious people, without offering any cases/analysis/etc.
Unvote (if needed) vote chapcrap
evil, you are so ridiculous. You're on my good list too! I've already given the reasons multiple times. If you're too lazy to go back and look what I've said, that's not my fault.
I'm gonna go ahead and vote kratos until he gives me a reason not too.
