Should nations that are underwater from Global warming, etc still retain their air? Do they retain a seat on the Council for Air? What ability to breathe does its people have? etc.?
Note.. please keep discussion of whether you believe the climate is changing off this thread. This is interesting just by itself!
You ask a good question! It reminds me of France, a country in Europe! In said country, a plot of land owned by one person is owned in a 'slice' all the way down to the core of the Earth! This means that when a Frenchman's house is found to be directly above a hoard of gold - albeit a mile underground, lol! - he can claim ownership to it (the gold, not the house, lol)!
Applying the inverse of this logic suggests that the very same Frenchman owns the air directly above his property, even if it's underwater, or so I presume!
ManBungalow wrote:Welcome to the forums, Army of GOD!
You ask a good question! It reminds me of France, a country in Europe! In said country, a plot of land owned by one person is owned in a 'slice' all the way down to the core of the Earth! This means that when a Frenchman's house is found to be directly above a hoard of gold - albeit a mile underground, lol! - he can claim ownership to it (the gold, not the house, lol)!
Applying the inverse of this logic suggests that the very same Frenchman owns the air directly above his property, even if it's underwater, or so I presume!
Praise the lord?
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
ManBungalow wrote:Welcome to the forums, Army of GOD!
You ask a good question! It reminds me of France, a country in Europe! In said country, a plot of land owned by one person is owned in a 'slice' all the way down to the core of the Earth! This means that when a Frenchman's house is found to be directly above a hoard of gold - albeit a mile underground, lol! - he can claim ownership to it (the gold, not the house, lol)!
Applying the inverse of this logic suggests that the very same Frenchman owns the air directly above his property, even if it's underwater, or so I presume!
Praise the lord?
i was gonna post that, but you posted it first. Praise the Lord.
Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
I can see massive dikes and reclamation projects getting really popular in the next 20 years......
If you can hold it, you can own it. But once the ocean takes the land, your boundary legally changes.
The reverse is the same.
If you dike off 100000 sq hectares, your coastal rights as a country increase to where the 200 mile marker is from your "new" shore.
oVo wrote:To any citizen with gills this is not a problem.
Yea, but only one of us can be Kevin Costner.
Kevin Costner was invented at McGill University in 1955, there is clearly a connection there... one really should've spotted it earlier.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
) --- it's got SHIELDS!
