Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
I agree. There's nothing wrong with those headpieces...oVo wrote:"The row over what Iran's women players are allowed to wear has been brewing for more than a year. FIFA banned the team last April due to their plan to wear headscarves, in accordance with the Islamic dress code which requires all women in Iran to cover their hair in public."
I think FIFA is stretching boundaries of their authority a bit here and that the Iranian women should have been allowed to compete. It's not as if they were planning to wear burkkas on the pitch and the head scarves are not that much of an embellishment beyond the headbands some players wear during matches. This is an international event and giving cultural differences a bit of extra consideration does not seem to be asking too much, as long as issues of concern are not extreme or over the top.
i think it's obligatory pursuant to Iranian laws. even in iran streets, I don't think women are allowed to go with no scarf.BigBallinStalin wrote:Did an authority in Iran in any way "strongly encourage" its players to wear head scarves for all games?
If that is true, then FIFA is opposing government intervention on one's identity. Essentially, FIFA is boycotting the repressive policies of the Iranian government, so why are some people upset about that?Pirlo wrote:i think it's obligatory pursuant to Iranian laws. even in iran streets, I don't think women are allowed to go with no scarf.BigBallinStalin wrote:Did an authority in Iran in any way "strongly encourage" its players to wear head scarves for all games?
maybe because FIFA as a football organization should not intervene in countries laws. now Iran will find it a great chance to play the victim role more and more. they will now argue that their women are not allowed to participate in football stuff for political reasons. in fact, FIFA has been involved in this for long time. Iran would also argue that their women do want to be veiled and FIFA is abusing its power to force some women to non-adhere to their belief.BigBallinStalin wrote:If that is true, then FIFA is opposing government intervention on one's identity. Essentially, FIFA is boycotting the repressive policies of the Iranian government, so why are some people upset about that?Pirlo wrote:i think it's obligatory pursuant to Iranian laws. even in iran streets, I don't think women are allowed to go with no scarf.BigBallinStalin wrote:Did an authority in Iran in any way "strongly encourage" its players to wear head scarves for all games?

Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
your post seems to be familiar to mesaxitoxin wrote:In my opinion, clearly women are not allowed to participate in football stuff for political reasons. In fact, FIFA has been involved in this for long time. Iran's women do want to be veiled and FIFA is abusing its power to force some women to non-adhere to their belief.
Is FIFA the all-great entity of what is right and fair in the world?BigBallinStalin wrote:If that is true, then FIFA is opposing government intervention on one's identity. Essentially, FIFA is boycotting the repressive policies of the Iranian government, so why are some people upset about that?Pirlo wrote:i think it's obligatory pursuant to Iranian laws. even in iran streets, I don't think women are allowed to go with no scarf.BigBallinStalin wrote:Did an authority in Iran in any way "strongly encourage" its players to wear head scarves for all games?

Not sure if soccer pun was intended...notyou2 wrote:FIFA is totally offside on this. It appears the real reason though is the Bahrainian official and Iran's tough stance on Bahrain.
I don't think islamic extremists have problem with the west..radiojake wrote:and people wonder why Islamic extremists have a problem with the west. This is fucking retarded -
Not sure if sex/drug pun was intended.notyou2 wrote:Can't slip one past you AoG.
I don't see Berlin mentioned in the article you linked to...CreepersWiener wrote:http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/06/05/idINIndia-57509720110605
Bigotry überalles!
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
The Women World Cup 2011 will be held in Germany after 5 days. FIFA dropped Iran's qualifier game against Jordan.MeDeFe wrote:I don't see Berlin mentioned in the article you linked to...CreepersWiener wrote:http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/06/05/idINIndia-57509720110605
Bigotry überalles!
So... a qualifier game that was to take place in Amman (not a German city) and was dropped by the international organisation FIFA means that Berlin... what? I think the title of the thread is misleading.Pirlo wrote:The Women World Cup 2011 will be held in Germany after 5 days. FIFA dropped Iran's qualifier game against Jordan.MeDeFe wrote:I don't see Berlin mentioned in the article you linked to...CreepersWiener wrote:http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/06/05/idINIndia-57509720110605
Bigotry überalles!
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Because freedom means the ability to follow one's religious creed, not just freedom from following religious dictates. That this might be a rule of the government and not the individual's "choice" is irrelevant. No one really gets to choose their uniform. As to a "political stand" -- there are far better ways to do that, far more effective. Sports events should be as free of politics as possible. As long as there is no true safety concern (long, flowing scarves might be, but something that resembles a "pony tail" for long hair would be OK., it should be allowed.BigBallinStalin wrote:If that is true, then FIFA is opposing government intervention on one's identity. Essentially, FIFA is boycotting the repressive policies of the Iranian government, so why are some people upset about that?Pirlo wrote:i think it's obligatory pursuant to Iranian laws. even in iran streets, I don't think women are allowed to go with no scarf.BigBallinStalin wrote:Did an authority in Iran in any way "strongly encourage" its players to wear head scarves for all games?
