Moderator: Community Team
I don't do night actions. Wish that I could. *mumble*blakebowling wrote:Just a reminder that you have a few hours before I post the night scene. and I am still missing 3 Night Actions.
Flavor confirms existence of two remaining boys, meaning Stan is in the game. 40k is confirmed town, based on no counter-claim.blakebowling wrote:Two young boys awoke in south park. Still indifferent about Eric's death, They walked down the road to meet the third. Across the street they saw a bloody Kenny McCormick.
"You killed Kenny!"
"You Bastards!"
chapcrap - Kenny McCormick (Human Shield) has been killed.
Begin Day 4
evilchaos wrote:Vote Com9
Two players were fed the soup and then died the next day. This is too much of a coincidence to ignore.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
@Everyone - we need opinions on this. 2 of 9 people alive have posted since day started...evilchaos wrote:Vote Com9
Two players were fed the soup and then died the next day. This is too much of a coincidence to ignore.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Classic scum neutrality...kratos644 wrote:Personally I'm not 100% sure what to think about this yet. Com hasn't appeared overly scummy to me but it's possible that his soup is killing people so for now I'll give a FOS Com9.
There is also the issue of Tail. When is the last time that we heard anything at all from him? Now I'm weary to go after him based on this alone because I was really busy and inactive as a result but was a power role although we've also had most of our power roles exposed already so maybe it would be alright to pressure him.
Exactly. Poisonous soup does not fit with Chef - yet you vote me. Smart.kratos644 wrote:It's neutral that I'm not convinced that Com9 hasn't been the one handing out the soup? That doesn't seem to fit as a role for chef to me. If that makes me appear scummy then so be it.
While I agree that you are probably not the one distributing the soup or at least think claiming chef while the poison soup nazi was the main focus for needs lynching was a bit risky for a scum with that much power, I don't see how you choosing not to communicate with the boys last night proves you wouldn't have sent anyone soup.Commander9 wrote:Exactly. Poisonous soup does not fit with Chef - yet you vote me. Smart.kratos644 wrote:It's neutral that I'm not convinced that Com9 hasn't been the one handing out the soup? That doesn't seem to fit as a role for chef to me. If that makes me appear scummy then so be it.
Also, I've not talked with the boys tonight (thus not using my action) and boys can confirm that, so should the soup appear somewhere again - that would mean I have nothing to do with this.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Well, a question to you then: do you think that there could be a poisoner with an extremely strong fake claim that would have an ability to tell anything to the boys? Furthermore, mod would even tell them that it was from Chef, basically confirming the role.strike wolf wrote: While I agree that you are probably not the one distributing the soup or at least think claiming chef while the poison soup nazi was the main focus for needs lynching was a bit risky for a scum with that much power, I don't see how you choosing not to communicate with the boys last night proves you wouldn't have sent anyone soup.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Well... If I would just say I didn't use an ability without any confirmation, that would not be a good defence - no way to check it. This way we will indeed learn something:strike wolf wrote:Ah ok I misunstood. I thought you were using a "well I didn't do this action so obviously I didn't do this action" defense but rather you were falling more back on "this is my ability. Not that."
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:Than I stick by my original comment. Just because you chose not to use one action wouldn't mean you didn't choose to do another. It is flawed logic.
Commander9 wrote:
Well, a question to you then: do you think that there could be a poisoner with an extremely strong fake claim that would have an ability to tell anything to the boys? Furthermore, mod would even tell them that it was from Chef, basically confirming the role.
Ok, let me have a go at rewriting what you said here:kratos644 wrote:Personally I'm not 100% sure what to think about this yet. Com hasn't appeared overly scummy to me but it's possible that his soup is killing people so for now I'll give a FOS Com9.
There is also the issue of Tail. When is the last time that we heard anything at all from him? Now I'm weary to go after him based on this alone because I was really busy and inactive as a result but was a power role although we've also had most of our power roles exposed already so maybe it would be alright to pressure him.
You basically said, in both cases, that the players aren't very scummy, but we should pressure them. a.k.a. Let's be neutral. That way I can start a bandwagon while leaving myself completely free to claim I never pushed hard for their lynch. You gave no strong conclusions on players. This is a scum tell, in my opinion.kratos's BS wrote:Personally, I'm not sure if Com9 is scum. He isn't overly scummy, but it's possible that he's scum. FoS Com9.
We haven't heard anything from Tail in a while. We shouldn't go after him, but we should pressure him (means the same thing - lol).
