Moderator: Cartographers

It's actually zweihundertfünfundvierzig... but who's countingDiM wrote:in german the numbers are always written together. 245 is not written two hundred and forty five but rather twohundredandfortyfive and wham bam you have a new word for each number.

i initially wanted to post it in german but i was adraid i'd confuse 40kguy even moreMrBenn wrote:It's actually zweihundertfünfundvierzig... but who's countingDiM wrote:in german the numbers are always written together. 245 is not written two hundred and forty five but rather twohundredandfortyfive and wham bam you have a new word for each number.
Exactly, compound words are simple to understand.for example german language can create virtually an infinite number of compound words
wait a minute. now you're comparing only latin and germanic languages. what happened to the rest? we were talking about the hardest language on earth and from what i know latin and germanic languages aren't the only ones. also, why ask that kid to learn both english and a germanic language when in fact english really IS a germanic language?DJ Teflon wrote:I reckon we need an experiment for this one:
Get a non-european language kid and teach them English, any latin language whatsoever (except Latin) and a germanic language (such as german), teachers of equal skill, and see which language they are closest-to-native in after, say, five years (including a few visits etc).
i never said they're hard to understand, i was merely demonstrating you how english doesn't have the largest vocabulary in the world as you said.DJ Teflon wrote:Exactly, compound words are simple to understand.DiM wrote:for example german language can create virtually an infinite number of compound words
You know, the way learning languages works, it's very easy to teach newborns... they learn simply from hearing the language being used - I don't remember anyone ever teaching my native language to me, yet I speak it fine...DiM wrote:take a newborn kid and try to teach him
The whole question of "largest vocabulary" is meaningless as such. It all depends on how you define "vocabulary size", for example, do you only count root words, or will you also count multiple forms of the same word... and if you also count compound words or numerals, then there are lots of languages that can be said to have an "infinite" vocabulary. Then there's the question if you should count loan words, and when exactly does a word stop being of one language and part of another?DiM wrote:english doesn't have the largest vocabulary in the world

My counter was that English os one of the most stupid and difficult to learn languages.natty_dread wrote:English is actually one of the easiest languages to learn
Yeah - but they cant spell.natty_dread wrote:it's very easy to teach newborns... they learn simply from hearing the language being used - I don't remember anyone ever teaching my native language to me, yet I speak it fine..
I have to conceed this point though.natty_dread wrote:no matter where you are, it's hard to turn on the tv or radio and not hear english (ok, unless you live in one of those crazy countries that insists on dubbing everything - but even then you still have the internet).
Intelligence is not equal to memory. Non-dumb-asses may be ok at spelling but to be great at spelling takes nothng nmore than boring memorising. Spelling accommodation, acommodation or whatever it is, and success or success, requires only rote-learning-memory. And what use is good spelling such as this - looking good to people who think it matters, i.e. the ruling classes.QoH wrote:If you're American/British and think grammar/vocabulary/spelling your own language is hard, then you're just a plain dumb-ass. Or really really stupid.
it's not just about speaking the language but also reading and writingnatty_dread wrote:You know, the way learning languages works, it's very easy to teach newborns... they learn simply from hearing the language being used - I don't remember anyone ever teaching my native language to me, yet I speak it fine...DiM wrote:take a newborn kid and try to teach him
handegg.DJ Teflon wrote:Reason 1 for calling this map Futbol. So many of the people who play the sport call it this, especially those who rule the world.
Reason 2 is that is would not comfuse our United Statsian friends who (due to our shared illogical non-compund language) as they like to use the word football for a sport involving hands and egg shapes. If we called it Football, then, later on, the USians wanted to create a map for their national body armour sport, they'd be forced to differentiate. I'm sure they wouldn't want to call it 'Handegg'.
Come to think of it, I don't remember anyone teaching me to read or write either... I just sort of spontaneously learned it when I was 4 or so, by reading the text on a carton of milk.DiM wrote:it's not just about speaking the language but also reading and writing

they dont even play with there feetnatty_dread wrote: Also the american "foot" "ball" is not even egg-shaped, it's more like a stretched pointy ellipsoid... or a lemon. We should just call it handlemon.

That would be interesting. I'd like to see a 1v1 map that isn't complete luck.Teflon Kris wrote:Maybe, in the absence of team starting positions, this map could be designed for 1 v 1 only in the short-term?
