Moderator: Community Team
I think you should always be able to "pick" a winner if you choose how you use your cards. That is not random, as you seem to think. This has to do with the color of the cards. Then again, it should be possible to select the cards where you indeed get the situation of 2 eliminated players. Not sure what happens then. Probably the first one in row (like: red before green, green before blue, etc.) will be eliminated and the person who has the first target will be the winner.basic_man2010_20 wrote:Player A has to play the cards as its a mixed set and he dont have 3 of any single color OR they are the same color and only has 3 of a single color and not a mixed set

the cards are ordered in seniority, so the first card recieved is played first. if that cards was C, then the hunter of C wins the game. B then gets elliminated but the game is already over.does this help?basic_man2010_20 wrote:okay so your playing an assassin game on doodle (say doodle as this is the most realistic map for this to happen on) and your useing the nuclear cards.
so lets say player A starts his turn player B and C each have 1 territory left
player A has to turn in cards
player A just happens by chance has player B and C's territory card
Player A has to play the cards as its a mixed set and he dont have 3 of any single color OR they are the same color and only has 3 of a single color and not a mixed set
when he plays the cards he eleminates BOTH PLAYER B AND C
who wins??
A,D,E,F,G,H
thats assumeing its a 8 player game that has
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,
B and C BOTH get ELIMINATED who wins this game?


I think JB refers to a suggestions that allows you to oder the cards, for just such an occasion. I do not believe it made it, but if you could change the order then no more accidental kills in assassin due to nukes, provided you have a choice left. Sometimes you just get the wrong cards. It is very rare i think.drunkmunky wrote:JB, here's the situation in which is occurs.
You have 5 cards: 3 red & 2 blue/green (either or, but 2 of the same colour). You must therefore play the 3 red cards. If your 2 opponents are within the 3 red cards, this scenario occurs.
rrrggJBlombier wrote:Ah yes, that seems like a more logical explanation indeed, Seb. The seniority of the cards, over the sequence of players in the game. I think that is correct.
Still, I think a player should be able to pick a winner (or no winner) using his cards. I can't think of any scenario (of cards) where the players is forced to eliminate two players. At least, in the case the OP described.

first in the game list is the first deadbeater, even if all players deadbeated as often..liamrisksmart wrote:a similar question,
what if all remaining players in a game deadbeat on precisely the same round in a freestyle game, who wins?
the player who finished the previous round? or just whoever is red (ie first in the game list) ?