DoomYoshi wrote:pancakemix wrote:Hensow wrote:BGtheBrain wrote:Vote Hensow
this is why I'm still voting rds it him or me
Fairly self-centered move. Understandable nonetheless. If you don't want to be lynched today I suggest you claim.
Pushing for a claim at only a couple votes? I realize it is a weird situation what with the odd lynch scenario but still an interesting approach. Others have already fos'ed you. I will add to that with a FOS on PCM.
He's effectively at -1 (or at least he was when I said that, as nag pointed out). I'd rather know whether or not having him lynched is a good idea than just letting it happen. And, considering the circumstances, I put forward for consideration that voting No Lynch is not an entirely bad idea in this scenario.
Blasphemy, I know, but hear me out. The point of "needing a lynch" on Day 1 is that there's no info to work with. The info we typically get anyway is less than desirable (voting patterns and such aren't the best leads, imo). Today is different because we've had plenty of real debate and a claim. If we got another claim, we could avoid being forced to lynch someone we find believable or someone who did nothing but get random voted.
Also understand that I'm not saying we absolutely should vote that way. It is dependent on Hensow's response and if I find him unbelievable or uncooperative I will vote for him. All I'm saying is that I don't see the need to lynch if there's no reason to lynch whoever's being lynched save for that we're forced (and let me just repeat that this is very situational, I wouldn't suggest it otherwise).
As if I wasn't under enough scrutiny already... 