Moderator: Community Team


Strife wrote:I hereby state Martin Ronne has inappropriately touched me. I would like to file charges against this sick bastard and expect he be sent to prison.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Um...what? First of all, every single homosexual I've known has preferred that term over "gay". Every one of them. The reason? Because at least it describes the orientation. Gay does not. This just strikes me as people trying to be offended.
They don't, you ignorant putz.Hannibał wrote:Why is it that the majority of gay guys act like flamers?

Or the difficulty we now have introducing English students to Gay Talese.demonfork wrote:I'm offended that the homosexuals commandeered the word "gay". The word used to mean happy before the homosexuals ripped it off and changed the meaning.
Just think of all of those poor women who's parents named them Gay just before the term was modified. You think that those women weren't made fun of?
Of course words have meaning by themselves. That's why we use them. They're not open for interpretation; when I say, "I am going to punch you in the face", you're not allowed to decide that it means that I'm actually about to have sex with your mother.Army of GOD wrote:Words, in themselves, are not bad. "Nigger", or "negro" standing by itself means abso-fucking-lutely nothing.
Using the word with a friend who prefers or doesn't mind it is entirely different than using it in a forum or otherwise public speech. If an individual friend doesn't mind it or prefers it, go ahead - as long as your intentions aren't to offend. But in public, don't; you will offend many people because it is offensive.The bigger problem, in my opinion, is the fact that you are telling people to stop using the word. Some gays find some words offensive, others couldn't give less of a shit.
For example, there was this gay kid who lived across the hall from me in my freshman dorm. He and I were really good friends, and he didn't care if people called him "gay", "queer", a "faggot" or "homosexual". Yet, when we called him "gaytistic" (gay+autistic...inside joke), he flipped the f*ck out.
Telling people to stop using a word altogether is annoying. I surely wouldn't want to hang out with people who are offended by words period, never mind just the word "homosexual". If I offend someone, then whatever.
I think it's interesting that you think gays "comandeered" the term. Just like they were the ones who started calling themselves "queer" and "fairy", right?demonfork wrote:I'm offended that the homosexuals commandeered the word "gay". The word used to mean happy before the homosexuals ripped it off and changed the meaning.
Just think of all of those poor women who's parents named them Gay just before the term was modified. You think that those women weren't made fun of?
My brother (originally sister) is a gay rights activist. Besides being one himself, he personally knows far more members of the LGBT community than you ever will in your lifetime, and has asked his professors to stop using the term. He also has "professor-friends" who were shocked by the ignorance of these professors. So don't go there.Woodruff wrote:Um...what? First of all, every single homosexual I've known has preferred that term over "gay". Every one of them. The reason? Because at least it describes the orientation. Gay does not. This just strikes me as people trying to be offended.
What the heck are they called then? I always thought homosexual was just the opposite of heterosexual.
That brings me to another point, thanks for reminding me. It's called the LGBT community. It stands for "Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transsexual". That's what they call themselves.Phatscotty wrote:What the heck are they called then? I always thought homosexual was just the opposite of heterosexual.
Hannibał wrote:I've got a question, since everyone wants to keep making these homosexual threads.
Why is it that the majority of gay guys act like flamers? Way over the top rhinestone,glitter,tight pastel shirts,etc. Screeching and carrying on like jackasses? Way more feminine then females.. it seems they want the attention, but act surprised when the attention is negetive.
I've known gay guys who don't act like this and the general public is usually much much more understanding and tolerant...so why? Why all the rainbow shit, bumper stickers,etc?
Thomas JeffersonYou can't expect a sexual orientation that has been oppressed for so long to be transported from the closet to liberty on a featherbed.
Actually, it's now called the LGBTQ, Q is for questioning...InkL0sed wrote:That brings me to another point, thanks for reminding me. It's called the LGBT community. It stands for "Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transsexual". That's what they call themselves.Phatscotty wrote:What the heck are they called then? I always thought homosexual was just the opposite of heterosexual.
So use those terms.
But that's exactly WHY I use the term "homosexual" instead of "gay". In my entire lifetime, I've not known anyone that didn't prefer the term "homosexual". I've known people who don't mind the term "gay" either (they basically didn't care what you called them as long as they knew you weren't trying to be an ass), but nobody that actually prefers that term, including one of my cadets last year. I'm not trying to challenge the article really, but that's why I find this very confusing and backward.InkL0sed wrote:I'm not asking you to stop using it with your friends, Woodruff and AoG. I'm asking for you to be aware of the fact that it is in fact offensive, since it implies that being gay is a choice. So don't use it with strangers, acquaintances, or on the Internet.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
Obviously you're wrong.InkL0sed wrote:Of course words have meaning by themselves. That's why we use them. They're not open for interpretation; when I say, "I am going to punch you in the face", you're not allowed to decide that it means that I'm actually about to have sex with your mother.Army of GOD wrote:Words, in themselves, are not bad. "Nigger", or "negro" standing by itself means abso-fucking-lutely nothing.


Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880
It's called the LGBTQI community, Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender-Queer-Intersexed. Please stop using LGBT. It is exclusionary and offensive to Intersexed people. Thank you.Inkl0sed wrote:That brings me to another point, thanks for reminding me. It's called the LGBT community. It stands for "Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transsexual". That's what they call themselves.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 0#p5349880