Moderator: Cartographers

Because that would decrease the number of "continents" on the map. And since this is an historical map, i'd like to retain that aspect and sense of history. I'm sorry if it is confusing for you.Industrial Helix wrote:I'd support it but I think there needs to be a reduction in the complexity of the map. For example, why have different years for the accusers and why not group them all into simply "the accusers."


Yes netty. I was experimenting with lowering their opacity, but removal althogether is a good option.natty_dread wrote:You know, I think you should get rid of most of the army circles. The territories are light enough to do without, and it would simplify the visual composition of this map significantly, I think.



thanks aon. i've got to try to figure out a way to work "gossip" in to the gameplay coz that is what all this was about...vicious gossip and tall tales and fear.army of nobunaga wrote:excited about this one. thanx for the work man


Yes i saw that before, it occurs in the translation from .cdr to .jpg, so i just gotta find another colour .natty_dread wrote:Sorry but the red text just below the bleeding eyes is totally illegible...
But, the removing of army circles & the colour scheme change is a huge improvement. +2 internets for that!




Yay!cairnswk wrote:I've decided i should get this back into devlopment... so will submit

I thought this would please you.natty_dread wrote:Yay!cairnswk wrote:I've decided i should get this back into devlopment... so will submit
Colours...OK i understand.Nola_Lifer wrote:I think I like the colors better on version 6. Of all the maps to work on next you pick this one.

Of course this is all personal, but I think the subject matter is ok. You have some other maps that I'd much rather see go through and will be played a bit more. Your WWI map comes to mind or even the Sydney map.cairnswk wrote:I thought this would please you.natty_dread wrote:Yay!cairnswk wrote:I've decided i should get this back into devlopment... so will submit![]()
Colours...OK i understand.Nola_Lifer wrote:I think I like the colors better on version 6. Of all the maps to work on next you pick this one.
You are not happy with this map ? May i ask why?

Thanks Nola_Lifer for replyingNola_Lifer wrote:...
Of course this is all personal, but I think the subject matter is ok. You have some other maps that I'd much rather see go through and will be played a bit more. Your WWI map comes to mind or even the Sydney map.

Yes i agree, but i recall that those colours gave me greif with the CB test and that's why i changed them.natty_dread wrote:As for colours, I think V6 is clearer, probably because of all the contrast...
Red added to Judges next version...that must have slipped...On the other hand I think the cold colour scheme on V7 fits the theme of the map better. Although you could add some bloody red to it, sort of like the judges on V6.

Oh, OK. Thank-you ironsij0287ironsij0287 wrote:I went ahead and moved this over to the Drafting Room.

Yes... I just wonder if you could take the best from both versions... the coldness of V7 but with the increased contrast of V6.cairnswk wrote:Yes i agree, but i recall that those colours gave me greif with the CB test and that's why i changed them.natty_dread wrote:As for colours, I think V6 is clearer, probably because of all the contrast...

Yes i think some more experimentation could occur, but for just now, i'll stick with V7, as it kind of gels.natty_dread wrote:Yes... I just wonder if you could take the best from both versions... the coldness of V7 but with the increased contrast of V6.cairnswk wrote:Yes i agree, but i recall that those colours gave me greif with the CB test and that's why i changed them.natty_dread wrote:As for colours, I think V6 is clearer, probably because of all the contrast...
