[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
SolidWolf34 wrote:Unexplained Rulings Threaten Rule of Law
In 1972-73, with the stated rationale being the pressing caseload in the federal court of appeals, the Board of the Federal Judicial Center moved to make it permissible to not publish opinions that were routine or had no significant precedential value. At that time, all court rulings always had an opinion written with it explaining the law as it applied to the decision made by the court and detailing the reasons upon which the judgment was based.
The new rule that limited what was published did not discuss eliminating the opinion that went with a ruling. It simply said that written opinions would not be published or assumed to be cited as precedent in the future.
But quickly, once rulings were not published, a much more insidious practice emerged - a practice which has the potential to completely undermine the rule of law and the liberty and justice it protects in America. The practice is that of the issuance by federal appeals courts of unpublished rulings that DO NOT STATE THE LEGAL RATIONALE FOR THEIR DECISION. These types of rulings with no reasoning are called nonopinions. Those nonopinions that are unpublished (the vast majority) are called unpublished nonopinions or unexplained decisions. Depending on the circuit, a nonopinion is called affirmance without opinion, summary order, summary disposition, summary opinion, unpublished order, disposition without opinion, abbreviated disposition, summary affirmance, judgment opinion, or simply, an order. Some states call the practice per curiam affirmance.
[/i]
Translation: The fact that Supreme Court Justices can write opinions in Court decisions that have nothing to do with the case at hand or any law is bad.
Relevance: Who the f*ck knows?
Dude, he's like, proving he's not just a 7 year old girl., and that he's smart., and that he's like, a doctor., or a accountant.! or something.; that would know whatever it is.!, he posted.,!?;:.,.!
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
I will third that.
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
Actually, that paragraph talks about irrelevant opinions written into case decisions made by the US Supreme Court and what other courts refer to them as.
It's less than nothing, it's __________!
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
Scalene wrote:Everyone ought to chill. You're not helping things.
Translation: "I'm SolidWolf34's other account that I made today in attempt to defend myself and try to ease the blame that I forced upon myself through my own stupidity."
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
I will third that.
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.
ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying others
firth4eva wrote:
ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying others
This is what you're sixthing...At least the fact we don't care.
SolidWolf34 wrote:Unexplained Rulings Threaten Rule of Law
In 1972-73, with the stated rationale being the pressing caseload in the federal court of appeals, the Board of the Federal Judicial Center moved to make it permissible to not publish opinions that were routine or had no significant precedential value. At that time, all court rulings always had an opinion written with it explaining the law as it applied to the decision made by the court and detailing the reasons upon which the judgment was based.
The new rule that limited what was published did not discuss eliminating the opinion that went with a ruling. It simply said that written opinions would not be published or assumed to be cited as precedent in the future.
But quickly, once rulings were not published, a much more insidious practice emerged - a practice which has the potential to completely undermine the rule of law and the liberty and justice it protects in America. The practice is that of the issuance by federal appeals courts of unpublished rulings that DO NOT STATE THE LEGAL RATIONALE FOR THEIR DECISION. These types of rulings with no reasoning are called nonopinions. Those nonopinions that are unpublished (the vast majority) are called unpublished nonopinions or unexplained decisions. Depending on the circuit, a nonopinion is called affirmance without opinion, summary order, summary disposition, summary opinion, unpublished order, disposition without opinion, abbreviated disposition, summary affirmance, judgment opinion, or simply, an order. Some states call the practice per curiam affirmance.
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
I will third that.
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.
ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying others
What, exactly, does that large paragraph have to do with anything?
I will third that.
Can I fourth it?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.
ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying others
The motion is seventhed
A kiss ( or hug..your choice ) to whoever eight it.
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.
ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying others
The motion is seventhed
A kiss ( or hug..your choice ) to whoever eight it.
Anarkistsdream wrote:We alreayd all know Solidwolf is a dildo... Why is this even important...
Oh... yeah... I'ts NOT!
shut the hell up man. why don't u come say it to my face.. all you know what to do is cut squid and take them to bed with you.. so WATCH IT
Why don't I come say that to your face....? Was that a question? If so, use a question mark...
And PM me your address, I'll make sure you get something nice in the mail.
Shut the hell up!! You have been reported to my Local Police Office, I will make sure something is done about what you just said!!
wow thats a funny line. what was he thinking!?!?!?! and solid you said he HAS been reported, what have they done about it so far? did they laugh at you as well?
And I think this long paragraph was to show us what his local policemen could do. Basicly, nothing.
I will go ahead and fifth it and add that he is prolly a little sissy boy 14 year in old catholic prep school with daddy's money who got molested by his priest when he was a child.
ill sixth this even though i dont ghave a clue what im sixthing. i just like quoting and copying others
The motion is seventhed
A kiss ( or hug..your choice ) to whoever eight it.
lol...i'll 8th it...
number nine number nine number nine number nine . . .