[Rules] Allow permabanned members to appeal

[notyou2]

I think qwert is stating past reality.

[Army of GOD]

Seriously, is anyone who's voting no gonna explain why? (griff doesn't count, Idunno lol != no)

[Army of GOD]

Looks like we have a hefty majority for this.

Let's get STICKY, with MICKEY!

[Army of GOD]

Anything?

[notyou2]

The silence is deafening.


Perhaps if we all paid money to the owner he would listen as I heard somewhere that money talks.













Oh, wait, we are paying money.

[jgordon1111]

I think that if you have been banned for a just cause it should stick,the bans were put in place for a reason.If you broke the rules there are consequences,if there are no consequences then dont have rules.The creator of the sight,Admin and moderators have a job to do,remove the rules they cant do it.And like any society not everyone agrees on every decision.You agreed to abide by the rules when you joined the sight,there wasnt a block attached anywhere I saw that said unless you think your special. If you really like the site after your ban is up you will come back and play again,and try to avoid getting banned again.

[Bruceswar]

I would bet there are more than 30 perma banned members. I support this idea.

[chapcrap]

I don't have a problem with some kind of appeals process. The only thing that I think is: isn't that what e-tickets are for? If the people want back in, can't they just file an e-ticket?

[TA1LGUNN3R]

I think that if you have been banned for a just cause it should stick,the bans were put in place for a reason.If you broke the rules there are consequences,if there are no consequences then dont have rules.The creator of the sight,Admin and moderators have a job to do,remove the rules they cant do it.And like any society not everyone agrees on every decision.You agreed to abide by the rules when you joined the sight,there wasnt a block attached anywhere I saw that said unless you think your special. If you really like the site after your ban is up you will come back and play again,and try to avoid getting banned again.

Didn't really read through the entire OP, did ya? Or did the concept completely elude you?

-TG

[jgordon1111]

Didnt elude Me,people get banned there is a reason for it. six months a year or permanent banned is bannned. there are rules for just about everything you dont follow them there are consequences,Did that part of the rules elude you Gunner.Or do you believe that the rules only apply to certain people. Who is that special someone you want back in the forums huh. come on share with everyone

[TA1LGUNN3R]

So person A gets permabanned at time 1. Person B commits the exact same infraction a year later at time 2 and gets the 3 month ban. How is that fair? Not to mention that this is merely a suggestion by the community, largely a paying base. If they feel that permas are excessive and that former customers should at least have an appeal to come back, what's the harm? It would increase traffic, revenue, etc. If, as you say, the administration runs the site and sets the rules, what wrong with them changing the rules and punishment? They must attempt to cater to the customer, otherwise there is no business.

-TG

[TA1LGUNN3R]

there are rules for just about everything you dont follow them there are consequences,Did that part of the rules elude you Gunner.

To elaborate, what establishes the rules? Why are these rules enforced? For what purpose do they exist? Presumably, they exist to foster and maintain an environment where customers will continue to spend money here. If the community as a majority (incoming money) feel these rules aren't conducive to the site, they may not renew their premium, or worse, leave.

The "rules" are arbitrary and momentary. Proof: the permas have already been shortened to 3-months.

-TG

[jgordon1111]

Then they got lucky the rules changed before their ban.Sometimes life is not fair you may understand when you get older.

[TA1LGUNN3R]

Then they got lucky the rules changed before their ban.Sometimes life is not fair you may understand when you get older.

ha ha you're funny.

-TG

[Army of GOD]

Alright, now that we got jgordon out of the way, anyone else wanna discuss their disagreement?

[Evil Semp]

The perma banned members should be happy we don't have the death penalty. Try appealing that.

[notyou2]

Well I guess you are judge, jury, and executioner then.

[Evil Semp]

Well I guess you are judge, jury, and executioner then.

Lighten up. I was joking around.

[chapcrap]

Alright, now that we got jgordon out of the way, anyone else wanna discuss their disagreement?

I don't have a problem with some kind of appeals process. The only thing that I think is: isn't that what e-tickets are for? If the people want back in, can't they just file an e-ticket?

Umm, this.

I still got no answer. Can't they just appeal using an e-ticket? If so, I don't see what we're trying to accomplish. They can already appeal. If not, then I don't have a problem with people appealing.

[Metsfanmax]

Alright, now that we got jgordon out of the way, anyone else wanna discuss their disagreement?

I don't have a problem with some kind of appeals process. The only thing that I think is: isn't that what e-tickets are for? If the people want back in, can't they just file an e-ticket?

Umm, this.

I still got no answer. Can't they just appeal using an e-ticket? If so, I don't see what we're trying to accomplish. They can already appeal. If not, then I don't have a problem with people appealing.

There's two ways in which the OP responds to this. The first is that, currently, banned members can file as many eTickets as they want but that doesn't mean the admins will listen; presumably, this change would require them to give due process, or what-have-you, in the case of an appeal. The second is that perhaps the appeals can have some element of publicity in their nature so that other CC members may state their case for unbanning the member (or keeping them banned).

[Army of GOD]

Alright, now that we got jgordon out of the way, anyone else wanna discuss their disagreement?

I don't have a problem with some kind of appeals process. The only thing that I think is: isn't that what e-tickets are for? If the people want back in, can't they just file an e-ticket?

Umm, this.

I still got no answer. Can't they just appeal using an e-ticket? If so, I don't see what we're trying to accomplish. They can already appeal. If not, then I don't have a problem with people appealing.

Now, I didn't read the rules entirely (just a skim), but I saw nothing about appealing bans on there. Like Mets said, this'll require mods to actually look at their case. Also, we could actually post something like this on the rules so that people know there's the possibility to appeal their bans, which I think no one knows it exists now (assuming it does exist now).

[natty dread]

The perma banned members should be happy we don't have the death penalty. Try appealing that.

Joking or not, it seems this is really indicative of the general attitude of Team CC these days.

[Evil Semp]

The perma banned members should be happy we don't have the death penalty. Try appealing that.

Joking or not, it seems this is really indicative of the general attitude of Team CC these days.

Or is it indicative of your attitude toward Team CC these days? Or is it more towards me?

[eddie2]

appealing of bans wont work because of the flaw in the c and a rules about banned members. on appeal a new hunter should review the case. If king a issues a punishment (which if a long period he does do this.) he then deals with the appeal as well.

[natty dread]

The perma banned members should be happy we don't have the death penalty. Try appealing that.

Joking or not, it seems this is really indicative of the general attitude of Team CC these days.

Or is it indicative of your attitude toward Team CC these days? Or is it more towards me?

Everything isn't always about you. Maybe it's time to have a look around and think... it's often good to do some self-reflection, no one is perfect and so on...