Moderator: Cartographers
Well, that's me out of the comp then. Used up all my luck with the guess.gimil wrote:6 entries in total. Seems that Koontz is on the money

A couple of weeks ago when Rj showed me his map, it got my competitive juices flowing and I put something together. But, like Rj, I decided not to enter for a variety of reasons. Anyway, DiM said you could do the basics in 2-3 hours, and that's exactly how much of my time I gave this. Obviously a lot of missing - bridges, territory names, connections - and it looks like crap, but two hours is plenty of time to knock out the basics if you have the gameplay in hand. And probably 30 minutes of my time was spent trying to figure out where to accurately put the lines of latitude and longitude.RjBeals wrote:I was going to enter, but don't have the time. This is not an entry. This is about 6 hours on and off.

Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong

I also like #5 best, it's so clean!samuelc812 wrote:Number 5 is my favourite, well done to everyone who entered.
~Sam
I agree with this statement as well, but I just gotta give the edge to #5. #6 was my second choice though.oaktown wrote:digging number 6 - nice to see that somebody had an original idea and did something unique.
Silvanus wrote:perch is a North Korean agent to infiltrate south Korean girls




PNG in this context means Papua New Guinea.natty_dread wrote:Appropriate style for PNG? What do you mean?
There's no "appropriate style for PNG". PNG can be whatever you want.
I mean it's just a file format. It's not like there's some limitations what kind of graphics you can or can't display on a PNG file.


Silvanus wrote:perch is a North Korean agent to infiltrate south Korean girls
Agreed here. I like both #6 and #2, but #6 wins out for me based on originality.perchorin wrote:I've changed my vote from #5 to #6 (which was always my second choice) simply because I'd rather #6 win than #2 (also an attractive map don't get me wrong) Obviously I don't know who made any of these so it's nothing personal, but we have plenty of maps that look like #2 and none that look like #6. It's time for some new looks I say!