WHY DO YA BUILD ME UP, BUTTERCUP...!thehippo8 wrote:ALTOGETHER NOW ... IN A LOUD VOICE
Oh, sorry
-Sully
Moderator: Community Team
WHY DO YA BUILD ME UP, BUTTERCUP...!thehippo8 wrote:ALTOGETHER NOW ... IN A LOUD VOICE

Fair point , I will give you somethingchapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

The only purpose for the vote was to wake TeeGee up. There was no other basis for voting for him. What's the hurry Chap? You sseem a bit keen!chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.

thehippo8 wrote:
The only purpose for the vote was to wake TeeGee up. There was no other basis for voting for him. What's the hurry Chap? You sseem a bit keen!

This post was edited.TeeGee wrote:Fair point , I will give you somethingchapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.
unvote vote chapcrap

chapcrap wrote:This post was edited.TeeGee wrote:Fair point , I will give you somethingchapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.
unvote vote chapcrap
Just saying...that's against the rules TeeGee.


There isn't anything to say I edited it but I will admit that I removed the double colour codes, I must have inadvertently hit the button twice and I totally forgot the no editing rule and went straight back in and removed it. I admit my guilt hereusAir wrote:I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"

That's because this forum is under TeeGee's department's 'jurisdiction', thus he has master editing powers that can't be seen unless he wants them to! I can do the same in the Conquer Club Newsletter and Announcements forums.usAir wrote:I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"
This is true. He just messed up the color stuff. It wasn't anything important.TeeGee wrote:There isn't anything to say I edited it but I will admit that I removed the double colour codes, I must have inadvertently hit the button twice and I totally forgot the no editing rule and went straight back in and removed it. I admit my guilt hereusAir wrote:I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"
The rules are meant to make mafia fun and playable, not to be wielded like a weapon. If teegee's edit was harmless, then don't worry about it. No need to get all aggressiveTheGeneral2112 wrote:I would almost vote teegee on principle after that faux pau.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Mr. Squirrel wrote:The rules are meant to make mafia fun and playable, not to be wielded like a weapon. If teegee's edit was harmless, then don't worry about it. No need to get all aggressiveTheGeneral2112 wrote:I would almost vote teegee on principle after that faux pau.
This was aggressive?usAir wrote:I love how rapidly these games go from joke votes to extremely tense accusations over very little.
On that note, FOS chapcrap, for, at least in my opinion, unnecessarily, and over-aggressively, pursuing a very minor mistake.
Or maybe you meant this was aggressive?chapcrap wrote:This post was edited.TeeGee wrote:Fair point , I will give you somethingchapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.
unvote vote chapcrap
Just saying...that's against the rules TeeGee.
chapcrap wrote:This is true. He just messed up the color stuff. It wasn't anything important.TeeGee wrote:There isn't anything to say I edited it but I will admit that I removed the double colour codes, I must have inadvertently hit the button twice and I totally forgot the no editing rule and went straight back in and removed it. I admit my guilt hereusAir wrote:I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"
What 2112 said. All I did was point out a mistake and say it wasn't important.TheGeneral2112 wrote:This was aggressive?usAir wrote:I love how rapidly these games go from joke votes to extremely tense accusations over very little.
On that note, FOS chapcrap, for, at least in my opinion, unnecessarily, and over-aggressively, pursuing a very minor mistake.
Or maybe you meant this was aggressive?chapcrap wrote:This post was edited.TeeGee wrote:Fair point , I will give you somethingchapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.
unvote vote chapcrap
Just saying...that's against the rules TeeGee.
chapcrap wrote:This is true. He just messed up the color stuff. It wasn't anything important.TeeGee wrote:There isn't anything to say I edited it but I will admit that I removed the double colour codes, I must have inadvertently hit the button twice and I totally forgot the no editing rule and went straight back in and removed it. I admit my guilt hereusAir wrote:I'm not sure where you all are seeing this edit, but from my account, I can't see that anything was edited (there's no bar under the post saying "this post was edited by TeeGee at XX:XX"![]()
![]()
![]()
Care to actually explain one of your votes for once, sully?Victor Sullivan wrote:unvote vote TheGeneral2112
Let's stay classy, eh?
-Sully
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Mr. Squirrel wrote:Care to actually explain one of your votes for once, sully?Victor Sullivan wrote:unvote vote TheGeneral2112
Let's stay classy, eh?
-Sully
i would like to know how you know the TeeGee is a townie? I haven't read anything even remotely suggesting he's a townie. Unless you know something the rest of us don'tVictor Sullivan wrote:I feel like TheGeneral is using a scapegoat-type method to get TeeGee lynched. It was clearly a newb mistake and didn't have any malicious intent. I feel like TheGeneral is just using it as an excuse to get a townie lynched.
-Sully
True that, and how quickly people get off track!usAir wrote:I love how rapidly these games go from joke votes to extremely tense accusations over very little.
unvote vote chapcrap
unvote vote chapcrap
Now, for those of you who are skimming, 2112 voted for chap. And chap (and I) saw the vote change. Chap mentioned it, and 2112 explained. Given chap had the greatest reason to pursue this and now chooses not to, unfortunately, I can find nothing useful here in this!!
But Chap said ...
chapcrap wrote:Why unvote TeeGee when he has given us nothing? All he did was show up. That's not enough to take my vote off.