You quite clearly didn't read the section explaining how the tournament works.fruitsmoothieboy wrote:in please and if i can may i get the Chargers
Moderator: Tournament Directors
You quite clearly didn't read the section explaining how the tournament works.fruitsmoothieboy wrote:in please and if i can may i get the Chargers
oh sorry i miss read i get it nowpaulgamelb wrote:You quite clearly didn't read the section explaining how the tournament works.fruitsmoothieboy wrote:in please and if i can may i get the Chargers

ditto.Bruceswar wrote:please remove me. I never signed up. Thank you and have a good tournament.
I have to tell you I'm not impressed with your attitude here. You realised that this was a complex set-up. If you want to make this work (which I imagine you do, or why design it) then you will need to exhibit patience and do a little hand-holding, giving clear explanations through the early rounds until people get the hang of it.paulgamelb wrote:Right guys, only five people have bothered getting back to me with their responses. SNARF17WD called it right in the thread when he said I will have nothing but problems with this one. I stated in the main thread that I have no intention of continually chasing people.
Get your destinations in or this tournament is dead before it has even started. It's not rocket science, pick one or two destinations.
Some of you are playing in other tournaments I am running, if you force this one to be abondoned then you will also be removed from the other tournaments because you will be foed.

Going to bring it in - I'm still playing a round 2 game as well now at 111 rounds. Too many games have turned into cheap tactic pile ups with no one attacking each other.chapcrap wrote:Can I suggest to start using round limits in the games?
I still have a week 2 game going that is almost to Round 100 now.