spoils , have rewards revrse back down .

limping ox · Post by **limping ox** » Sat Dec 17, 2011 9:16 am

For example in a six man game have spoils increase to 35 men and the next match would be worth 30, 25, 20 ect. in the same way they increased. When they return to 4 they would increase in order again .

s3xt0y · Post by **s3xt0y** » Sat Dec 17, 2011 2:13 pm

tec805 · Post by **tec805** » Sat Dec 17, 2011 2:15 pm

Escalating spoils is to help the game finish in a reasonable amount of time, changing that to reducing spoils would increase the time. Just play flat rate if you want longer games.

zimmah · Post by **zimmah** » Sat Dec 17, 2011 3:19 pm

first one to cash in would just instantly win in most games/maps. it's poor game design and totaly imbalanced.

Criticalwinner · Post by **Criticalwinner** » Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:51 pm

tec805 wrote:Escalating spoils is to help the game finish in a reasonable amount of time, changing that to reducing spoils would increase the time. Just play flat rate if you want longer games.

^The Truth.

If you are going towards a stalemate, be happy you get those added bonuses.

spoils , have rewards revrse back down .

spoils , have rewards revrse back down .

Re: spoils , have rewards revrse back down .

Re: spoils , have rewards revrse back down .

Re: spoils , have rewards revrse back down .

Re: spoils , have rewards revrse back down .