Moderator: Tournament Directors
Can't wait to see next year's tourney. I plan to still be around. I know I asked about the criteria for keeping coaching jobs a while back, and you're answer was 4 wins or something like that. Just want to give you a heads up that I believe tourney rules state that you can't reserve spots for over 50% of the field (i.e. half of the tournament has to be open to public sign up). Might pose a problem if you're allowing losing coaches to automatically be in next year's tournament.AmphibiousRodent wrote:Looks like the only difference is strength of schedule:
Team, adj w%, SOS (%), v. T25
MSU, .909, 66-54 (.550), 3-0
BYU, .986, 45-84 (.349), 4-0
ISU, .970, 55-64 (.462), 2-0
Keep in mind that MSU's only loss was to Michigan, which is 9-2 and #14 at the moment. Nobody on BYU's schedule is currently ranked, while two of ISU's are. This season has been a learning experience as far as how to run a ranking formula. I think next year's formula will be more accurate.
It wont matter, hes sweeping me in our last game. I have had the worst dice ever in this tourney this game and he got to go first in every game as well. Oh well. Better luck next season i guess.AmphibiousRodent wrote:News update: Iowa State's Week 11 game against Oklahoma finally ended with a 6-3 upset by the Sooners. That means Iowa State's game this week against Kansas State is now for the league championship. A KState win would create a 3-way tie atop the Big-12 standings, but both ISU and KSU hold a tiebreaker over Missouri (Iowa State won 37-34 in Week 7 and Kansas State won 30-29 in Week 6). These are exciting times in the Big-12.
EDIT: I just looked again, and it looks like Kansas State's Week 12 game will end in a Texas upset over KSU. So that will throw a wrench in the works. I guess things aren't as clear as I thought.
Iowa State's loss means BYU is the only remaining undefeated team left. Michigan State, Iowa State and Ball State all have one loss, and everyone else has two or more.
Also, #14 Michigan's 28-23 win over #4 Ohio State this week means #1 Michigan State will not play in the Big Ten championship game.
From the Big East website:blindman30 wrote:What exactly are the tie breakers for conf without a championship game (big east). Dont plan on needing it but would like to know just incase
Applying this to our the CC version of the Big East, if WVA, Rutgers and Pitt all wind up 6-1 and they are all 1-1 against each other, then rankings would break the tie.TWO-WAY TIE
The winner of the head to head match-up will represent the BIG EAST in the Bowl Championship Series.
THREE-WAY TIE
A "MINI-CONFERENCE" IS CREATED AMONGST THE THREE TIED TEAMS
Scenario I:
All three teams have either a 6-1 or 5-2 record and have each won one game and lost one game against the other tied teams in the mini-conference. In this case, the highest ranked team amongst the three earns the bid. If two of the three teams are tied for the highest ranking, the bid is earned by the team winning the head-to-head match up.
Scenario II:
All three teams have 5-2 records, and within the mini-conference, Team A is 2-0, Team B is 1-1, and Team C is 0-2. Team A earns bid regardless of ranking.
FOUR-WAY TIE
A "MINI-CONFERENCE" IS CREATED AMONGST THE FOUR TIED TEAMS
Scenario I:
In the mini-conference, Teams A & B are 2-1, and Teams C & D are 1-2. The higher ranked of the 2-1 teams earns the bid. If the 2-1 teams tie for the highest ranking, the bid goes to the team that won the head-to-head match up.
Scenario II:
In the mini-conference, Team A is 3-0, Team B is 2-1, Team C is 1-2, and Team D is 0-3. Team A earns bid regardless of ranking.
