Moderator: Cartographers

Just east indies doesn't match with the commmon definition of those areas (south east was splitted and part of it labelled like east indies to not change the gameplay). China is china (usually named east asia with japan and korea. Again we used the parts to not change the gameplay), north and west asia are north and west asia, south asia is south asia. The names were changed accordingly with the eTicket recieved plus researches on wikipedia, plus the advices of iancanton, who is a "names guru" and everyone here know this.Victor Sullivan wrote:Nice! Glad to see the Far East and/or Asia is getting some love
That being said, aside from "East Indies", I'm not fond of the change in the bonus area names, as they aren't really proper names for some of those areas, and I hate using cardinal directions to name bonus areas. In addition, you call the red bonus area "North & West Asia" in the legend at the bottom-left, but seem to refer to it as "Soviet Socialist Republics" in the bottom-right legend.
-Sully
Yeah i know, I hate to admit the I was forced to put it "upside down", but let me say that the old one wasn't really placed with a logic. Anyway, to have it reversed i have to enlarge the map (now it is 630px), that is something we'd like to avoid.koontz1973 wrote:The bonus legend seems to be upside down. Any reason for this? but great work in making this map playable again.

I see why you had to put it upside down, but I would just like to point out that the old legend did have a logic to it. It was the largest bonus down to the smallest. It may not be a logic that you like, but it was a logic.thenobodies80 wrote:Yeah i know, I hate to admit the I was forced to put it "upside down", but let me say that the old one wasn't really placed with a logic. Anyway, to have it reversed i have to enlarge the map (now it is 630px), that is something we'd like to avoid.koontz1973 wrote:The bonus legend seems to be upside down. Any reason for this?

Because the map is listed as "Asia" in the map browser, yet the map image says "Far East".DiM wrote:while i understand and applaud the cosmetic changes i don't understand why the name is debated. leave it as it is.
They could stand to look a bit sharper, yes.DiM wrote:PS: mountains look bad.



grifftron wrote:hope the new revamped version goes thru the foundry, i wouldn't pass it as is if i was a foundry mod.
Good point. All revamps should go through the foundry.grifftron wrote:hope the new revamped version goes thru the foundry, i wouldn't pass it as is if i was a foundry mod.

ah.. well that makes sense for seasonal maps i guess, even tho some are just ugly as hell... but for other revamps in the past were they awarded an entire website shout out like this one? is it just for the name change? It just seems like all of this could be done in the graphic section of the foundry is all... no offense to nobodies of course but the revamp on this one looks too simple to just pass right threw, it deserves a better revamp then just making the colors stand out more on the map itself and some name changes, why not revamp the graphics all together? change the mountain, get that goofy looking dragon and compass out of there and replace it with a eye refreshing background? Hope so.natty_dread wrote:Good point. All revamps should go through the foundry.grifftron wrote:hope the new revamped version goes thru the foundry, i wouldn't pass it as is if i was a foundry mod.
We're always told that "seasonal" maps get a pass from the foundry process because they aren't playable all the time, and the admin "doesn't want to spoil the surprise" or whatever, but this is a map that is in the regular circulation, it shouldn't get any special treatment just because it's the foundry foreman doing the revamp.
On another note, why is Kazakhstan abbreviated on the map? There's plenty of room for the full territory name. Abbreviations should only be used when the full name can't comfortably fit on the map.
