RON PAUL: AMERICA'S RACIST CANDIDATE

[pimpdave]

Hey guys, check this out, one of Ron Paul's newsletters:

http://graphics.thomsonreuters.com/11/1 ... ation2.pdf

Can you point to the specific part of that letter that is racist? I read most of it and did not see it.

That's about how Ron Paul is inciting violence against peaceful American citizens.

[rockfist]

Hey guys, check this out, one of Ron Paul's newsletters:

http://graphics.thomsonreuters.com/11/1 ... ation2.pdf

Can you point to the specific part of that letter that is racist? I read most of it and did not see it.

That's about how Ron Paul is inciting violence against peaceful American citizens.

It seemed extreme anti-government and a bit far fetched (although stranger things have happened), but he was advocating NOT violently overthrowing the government. He was advocating fighting against the government within our electoral system, which you may disagree with, but its hardly a crime.

[pimpdave]

Pretty sure he said to stockpile weapons because anyone who knocks on your door might be an IRS agent and you should be terrified. To be prepared, he suggests getting AK-47s ready and shoot any government employee you suspect. It's all right there in the subtext dude.

His violent rhetoric chills me to the bone, frankly. The only thing more horrifying are members of the Tea Party (a violent, racist organization).

[CreepersWiener]

Let's also make the point that Ron Paul was against the Civil War! His solution to the Civil War was for the government to BUY all the slaves from everyone in America, and then free them! ABSURDITY AT ITS FINEST! Racist old bastard!

You sir, are an idiot.

And you sir...are a bigoted, racist, anti-American, homophobic terrorist.

If slavery is wrong (that means the economic-end of it as well); why in the hell would you BUY all the slaves in the country and then free them? Why give money to the slave dealers? Isn't that a wrong thing to do? Or is that a right thing to do? By my set of morals (of which I have at least one), it tells me that that course of action would have been the wrong thing to do. It's like if the states had complete power (as Ron Paul would have it) and a few of them decided Child Pornography and Child Sex Slavery was okay in their states. The Federal government states that Child porn and selling Children for sex is now illegal, but instead of commanding all those states that think Child Porn and Child Sex is okay...they decide to just BUY all the Child Porn and Child Sex Slaves so as not to piss off the states where such activity was legal.

Don't you see something wrong with that picture?

[pimpdave]

This is an outrage! Ron Paul also supports Child Sex Slavery?

[jay_a2j]

Let's also make the point that Ron Paul was against the Civil War! His solution to the Civil War was for the government to BUY all the slaves from everyone in America, and then free them! ABSURDITY AT ITS FINEST! Racist old bastard!

You sir, are an idiot.

And you sir...are a bigoted, racist, anti-American, homophobic terrorist.

If slavery is wrong (that means the economic-end of it as well); why in the hell would you BUY all the slaves in the country and then free them? Why give money to the slave dealers? Isn't that a wrong thing to do? Or is that a right thing to do? By my set of morals (of which I have at least one), it tells me that that course of action would have been the wrong thing to do. It's like if the states had complete power (as Ron Paul would have it) and a few of them decided Child Pornography and Child Sex Slavery was okay in their states. The Federal government states that Child porn and selling Children for sex is now illegal, but instead of commanding all those states that think Child Porn and Child Sex is okay...they decide to just BUY all the Child Porn and Child Sex Slaves so as not to piss off the states where such activity was legal.

Don't you see something wrong with that picture?

The point was that there were other ways to end slavery besides killing 600,000 people! But of course you have your liberal head shoved so far up the progressive ass you can't see this.

[thegreekdog]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/turnstyle ... 81427.html

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 8&t=161158

[Symmetry]

Let's also make the point that Ron Paul was against the Civil War! His solution to the Civil War was for the government to BUY all the slaves from everyone in America, and then free them! ABSURDITY AT ITS FINEST! Racist old bastard!

You sir, are an idiot.

And you sir...are a bigoted, racist, anti-American, homophobic terrorist.

If slavery is wrong (that means the economic-end of it as well); why in the hell would you BUY all the slaves in the country and then free them? Why give money to the slave dealers? Isn't that a wrong thing to do? Or is that a right thing to do? By my set of morals (of which I have at least one), it tells me that that course of action would have been the wrong thing to do. It's like if the states had complete power (as Ron Paul would have it) and a few of them decided Child Pornography and Child Sex Slavery was okay in their states. The Federal government states that Child porn and selling Children for sex is now illegal, but instead of commanding all those states that think Child Porn and Child Sex is okay...they decide to just BUY all the Child Porn and Child Sex Slaves so as not to piss off the states where such activity was legal.

Don't you see something wrong with that picture?

The point was that there were other ways to end slavery besides killing 600,000 people! But of course you have your liberal head shoved so far up the progressive ass you can't see this.

Which other ways? You didn't mention them in your point.

[thegreekdog]

Which other ways? You didn't mention them in your point.

The British way, the French way, the Roman way, the Greek way, the Chinese way, the Russian way, the Spanish way, the Portugese way...

[pimpdave]

Yeah, it's too bad the South insisted on causing the horrible deaths of about 600,000 people over it. It could have been done peacefully.

[CreepersWiener]

Yeah, it's too bad the South insisted on causing the horrible deaths of about 600,000 people over it. It could have been done peacefully.

Bump.

[thegreekdog]

Yeah, it's too bad the South insisted on causing the horrible deaths of about 600,000 people over it. It could have been done peacefully.

Bump.

The Japanese way, the South African way, the Italian way, the Czechoslavkian way, the Iraqi way...

[AAFitz]

Let's also make the point that Ron Paul was against the Civil War! His solution to the Civil War was for the government to BUY all the slaves from everyone in America, and then free them! ABSURDITY AT ITS FINEST! Racist old bastard!

You sir, are an idiot.

And you sir...are a bigoted, racist, anti-American, homophobic terrorist.

If slavery is wrong (that means the economic-end of it as well); why in the hell would you BUY all the slaves in the country and then free them? Why give money to the slave dealers? Isn't that a wrong thing to do? Or is that a right thing to do? By my set of morals (of which I have at least one), it tells me that that course of action would have been the wrong thing to do. It's like if the states had complete power (as Ron Paul would have it) and a few of them decided Child Pornography and Child Sex Slavery was okay in their states. The Federal government states that Child porn and selling Children for sex is now illegal, but instead of commanding all those states that think Child Porn and Child Sex is okay...they decide to just BUY all the Child Porn and Child Sex Slaves so as not to piss off the states where such activity was legal.

Don't you see something wrong with that picture?

The point was that there were other ways to end slavery besides killing 600,000 people! But of course you have your liberal head shoved so far up the progressive ass you can't see this.

Yes. There was another way. They could have freed their slaves instead of killing 600,000 people! But of course, thats just too sane and obvious, so you of course missed that tiny little detail.

Instead of freeing enslaved human beings, they killed other humans to protect that right, and you are condemning the attempt to free them, and you're the one that believes in a Good God? It really would be funny if it weren't so utterly sad.

[Phatscotty]

Slavery was institutionalized in the new world by European powers.

The birth of America was the end of slavery.

Some racists are far too obsessed with race to ever see any of the facts clearly.

[Woodruff]

Slavery was institutionalized in the new world by European powers.
The birth of America was the end of slavery.
Some racists are far too obsessed with race to ever see any of the facts clearly.

Didn't Europe make slavery illegal far before America did? It's not really a
good thing that "America was the end of slavery" simply because America was the
last civilized nation to actually stop using it.

[Phatscotty]

Slavery was institutionalized in the new world by European powers.
The birth of America was the end of slavery.
Some racists are far too obsessed with race to ever see any of the facts clearly.

Didn't Europe make slavery illegal far before America did? It's not really a
good thing that "America was the end of slavery" simply because America was the
last civilized nation to actually stop using it.

Some parts of Europe, sure. Also, those parts of Europe that made slavery illegal did not do it in their first year or tenth year of existence. For some countries you seem to be holding on a pedestal, it took thousands of years for them to end slavery (wtg!). It only took my country 2 generations. Not bad for the early 1800's. It's not like there was twitter or automobiles to help people organize against slavery during a time when states were considered to be their own countries for a while. Quite impressive actually.

America's founding laid the path for "all men are created equal". Issues don't just solve themselves. It took an American born generation who were taught American principles of freedom. Of course you need to learn about American principles before you can practice those principles, which is something you guys seem to always forget.

[Woodruff]

Slavery was institutionalized in the new world by European powers.
The birth of America was the end of slavery.
Some racists are far too obsessed with race to ever see any of the facts clearly.

Didn't Europe make slavery illegal far before America did? It's not really a
good thing that "America was the end of slavery" simply because America was the
last civilized nation to actually stop using it.

Some parts of Europe, sure. Also, those parts of Europe that made slavery illegal did not do it in their first year or tenth year of existence. For some countries you seem to be holding on a pedestal, it took thousands of years for them to end slavery (wtg!). It only took my country 2 generations.

All of this is actually (though not surprisingly) completely irrelevant to the point.

Not bad for the early 1800's.

Actually, it IS very bad, given the state of slavery in the rest of the civilized world at the time.

It's not like there was twitter or automobiles to help people organize against slavery during a time when states were considered to be their own countries for a while.

True...all of those countries used their consciences instead, whereas America was just worried about profits.

Quite impressive actually.

Yes, though not for America.

America's founding laid the path for "all men are created equal". Issues don't just solve themselves. It took an American born generation who were taught American principles of freedom. Of course you need to learn about American principles before you can practice those principles, which is something you guys seem to always forget.

"You guys"? Where the hell do you think I live? The fact of the matter is that, as far as slavery goes, America is a black mark in history, NOT a group to be held up as a shining example.

[pimpdave]

The Tea Party wants to bring back slavery, just for all people who aren't the wealthiest 1%. Ron Paul wants more slavery too, just to the voices in his head.

[Jock McCock]

Just to add a slight degree of balance to this thread:

[CreepersWiener]

More proof to the puddin' (Ron Paul = Racist old bastard!)

[CreepersWiener]

Wow! Something new...I never knew this, but it is true! Ron Paul was against the Civil Liberties Act! Now, if that isn't a sign of a racist, I don't know what is!

[BigBallinStalin]

Pretty sure he said to stockpile weapons because anyone who knocks on your door might be an IRS agent and you should be terrified. To be prepared, he suggests getting AK-47s ready and shoot any government employee you suspect. It's all right there in the subtext dude.

His violent rhetoric chills me to the bone, frankly. The only thing more horrifying are members of the Tea Party (a violent, racist organization).

Does that mean that Ron Paul is the Grand Wizard behind the Tea Party Death Squads (an efficient, clandestine organization)?

[CreepersWiener]

RON PAUL SUCKS!

[BigBallinStalin]

Just to add a slight degree of balance to this thread:

That bottom left video was pretty moving.


Good post, Mr. Jock McCock.