Moderator: Community Team

I'd rather explain after the question is answered. What I will say is that I believe I can definitively prove if WW is town or if he is not town based on his answer.jgordon1111 wrote:ok still pretty new to this, I need an explaination of what is strike wolfs question, strike are you saying the mod has told you something about WW's role,and if he did and you know that he is scum you need to share with all of us,about what the mod said. Sorry if I missed the point entirely there and am off on what you meant strike. Because otherwise this looks strange to me.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.

How do we know the second kill wasn't a serial killer? Could it be the mafia only got one kill and the second was the serial killer? Is that normally denoted in the scene?wildwilliam wrote:I do believe there is a Serial killer in this game, but not any of the Turks. It does not fit their role. But it does fit Sephiroth who can (almost 90%) be guaranteed is in the game. It is weird that he got no kill last night, maybe he was role blocked?
might as well be...strike wolf wrote: I am a minor power role yes. I can't go into too much detail but the last time I admitted to being roleblocked it worked out well for town. Am I THE cop? No nor am I the doctor.
If you're not going to out yourself... don't out yourself. You might not think giving a list of things you're not won't help anyone - but if you're not enough things, eventually you'll be something...strike wolf wrote:Is all of my money and passport under my bed? Nope! In the attic? Guess again! You'll probably never guess, it's not under the lamp either!!!
maximumbandit wrote:How do we know the second kill wasn't a serial killer? Could it be the mafia only got one kill and the second was the serial killer? Is that normally denoted in the scene?wildwilliam wrote:I do believe there is a Serial killer in this game, but not any of the Turks. It does not fit their role. But it does fit Sephiroth who can (almost 90%) be guaranteed is in the game. It is weird that he got no kill last night, maybe he was role blocked?
might as well be...strike wolf wrote: I am a minor power role yes. I can't go into too much detail but the last time I admitted to being roleblocked it worked out well for town. Am I THE cop? No nor am I the doctor.
If you're not going to out yourself... don't out yourself. You might not think giving a list of things you're not won't help anyone - but if you're not enough things, eventually you'll be something...strike wolf wrote:Is all of my money and passport under my bed? Nope! In the attic? Guess again! You'll probably never guess, it's not under the lamp either!!!
That's all I have to offer...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
True enough - but I don't see how saying "I'm not outing myself!" and then providing further details about your role benefits either you or the town...strike wolf wrote:There's enough rolls in the game that I did not give that much information away. It's not like I plan to go down the entire list. I'm simply stating that I am not one of the two most important. Either way it's still all wifomy...
I almost copied and pasted, but decided to check and I am glad I did because I would have been mod killed:strike wolf wrote:Well if it's heading down this road anyways I have a question for WW. I asked the mod and he did say I could ask this, however I want to know what the mod said your investigation results would say depending on an innocent or guilty result.
Sorry I should have been more specific. I just need(ed) what your specific results are for an innocent/guilty result which Rodion said would be alright for you to say. So are you saying your PM specifically says that you will receive an "innocent" or a "guilty" result?wildwilliam wrote:I almost copied and pasted, but decided to check and I am glad I did because I would have been mod killed:strike wolf wrote:Well if it's heading down this road anyways I have a question for WW. I asked the mod and he did say I could ask this, however I want to know what the mod said your investigation results would say depending on an innocent or guilty result.
2. Do not quote any PMs you receive from the Mod. The only things you may post (loosely paraphrasing) are your roles (and anything associated with them), and alignment, during the active game. Once the game has concluded, feel free to post the rest of your personal information. You may not post your win condition, how many words are in your role PM, or any other kind of way to get around not quoting PMs.
were you trying to get me killled strike?![]()
anyways, with out getting Mod killed:
I am Tifa Lockhart from FF VII the game.
I am Town J.O.A.T.
I have 3 one shot abilities:
.I have a 1 shot vig. I PM my target to Rodion. I will know my kill because it will reference Crystal Gloves.
I have a 1 shot doc. I PM my target to Rodion.
I have a 1 shot cop. I PM my target to Rodion. I will receive either an innocent/guilty response.
My PM does not mention any specifics about what I will find. All it says is that I will get an innocent or guilty response.
That is it.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
My cop role says that I will receive an innocent or a guilty response on the person I investigate. that is it. It does not say whether it will come back as "mafia" or "third party" or "serial killer" it just says you will get either receive a guilty or innocent response to my investigation. So I was actually surprised to see a third party faction.strike wolf wrote:Sorry I should have been more specific. I just need(ed) what your specific results are for an innocent/guilty result which Rodion said would be alright for you to say. So are you saying your PM specifically says that you will receive an "innocent" or a "guilty" result?wildwilliam wrote:I almost copied and pasted, but decided to check and I am glad I did because I would have been mod killed:strike wolf wrote:Well if it's heading down this road anyways I have a question for WW. I asked the mod and he did say I could ask this, however I want to know what the mod said your investigation results would say depending on an innocent or guilty result.
2. Do not quote any PMs you receive from the Mod. The only things you may post (loosely paraphrasing) are your roles (and anything associated with them), and alignment, during the active game. Once the game has concluded, feel free to post the rest of your personal information. You may not post your win condition, how many words are in your role PM, or any other kind of way to get around not quoting PMs.
were you trying to get me killled strike?![]()
anyways, with out getting Mod killed:
I am Tifa Lockhart from FF VII the game.
I am Town J.O.A.T.
I have 3 one shot abilities:
.I have a 1 shot vig. I PM my target to Rodion. I will know my kill because it will reference Crystal Gloves.
I have a 1 shot doc. I PM my target to Rodion.
I have a 1 shot cop. I PM my target to Rodion. I will receive either an innocent/guilty response.
My PM does not mention any specifics about what I will find. All it says is that I will get an innocent or guilty response.
That is it.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Why would you assume that our investigation roles would give the same results, especially when our other roles are so different?strike wolf wrote:Alright. I now feel comfortable doing this. vote wildwilliam
Reason. I am Vincent Valentine (from FFVII the game)-town JOAT. I did not initially counter WW's J.O.A.T. claim because A. His set of abilities are slightly different than mine (I have a roleblock but no kill). B. I was not convinced there was only one JOAT in the game. C. I felt I could use my investigation to better prove if he was town or scum however I was role blocked. D. I was unconvinced that in a claim battle, that my claim would be stronger than a Tifa claim. My role according to Wikipedia suggested my character was relatively minor and almost was not playable within the game before gaining greater popularity after the game was released. What has changed a. It has been suggested that my claim may be stronger than I thought it was. B. What Wildwill claims he gets does not match what my investigation results would say.
Also considering what my results say, I am no longer thinking that Sephiroth is an SK and may instead be working with a second Mafia. However 2 mafias with 4 members seems a little over powered.
It seems like a good case to me. That and william choosing not to do any action. It just seems too convenient to me.strike wolf wrote:Alright. I now feel comfortable doing this. vote wildwilliam
Reason. I am Vincent Valentine (from FFVII the game)-town JOAT. I did not initially counter WW's J.O.A.T. claim because A. His set of abilities are slightly different than mine (I have a roleblock but no kill). B. I was not convinced there was only one JOAT in the game. C. I felt I could use my investigation to better prove if he was town or scum however I was role blocked. D. I was unconvinced that in a claim battle, that my claim would be stronger than a Tifa claim. My role according to Wikipedia suggested my character was relatively minor and almost was not playable within the game before gaining greater popularity after the game was released. What has changed a. It has been suggested that my claim may be stronger than I thought it was. B. What Wildwill claims he gets does not match what my investigation results would say.
Also considering what my results say, I am no longer thinking that Sephiroth is an SK and may instead be working with a second Mafia. However 2 mafias with 4 members seems a little over powered.
I would expect investigation results to be the same for all investigative roles.wildwilliam wrote:Why would you assume that our investigation roles would give the same results, especially when our other roles are so different?
Tifa could have been given as a fakeclaim though.wildwilliam wrote:sorry, but your claim is not stronger than Tifa Lockhart.

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
and I could easily be verified by using my kill and seeing the flavor I claimed.wildwilliam wrote:1) I had to be investigated by someone last night.
2) I am hoping by my second part of my post about the flavor of my kill that barett would back me up. maybe the same thing happened to him and his gatling gun.
3) why make such an important character a fake claim? She is one of the main members of Avalanche.
I can't confirm the second one but I would assume mafia and other roles with kills would also be informed of their kill flavour. 1 is flawed and explained in #3 if you had a strong claim and no counter claim, you would not be investigated. The other side of that is I did attempt to investigate you.wildwilliam wrote:1) I had to be investigated by someone last night.
2) I am hoping by my second part of my post about the flavor of my kill that barett would back me up. maybe the same thing happened to him and his gatling gun.
3) why make such an important character a fake claim? She is one of the main members of Avalanche.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:I can't confirm the second one but I would assume mafia and other roles with kills would also be informed of their kill flavour. 1 is flawed and explained in #3 if you had a strong claim and no counter claim, you would not be investigated. The other side of that is I did attempt to investigate you.wildwilliam wrote:1) I had to be investigated by someone last night.
2) I am hoping by my second part of my post about the flavor of my kill that barett would back me up. maybe the same thing happened to him and his gatling gun.
3) why make such an important character a fake claim? She is one of the main members of Avalanche.
3 I kind of feel is A. You hiding behind a good fake claim b. Rodion placing in a strong fake claim to help mafia.
Why would you receive two role PMs? Given wildwilliam's shaky reasons for having nothing to report from last night, I was really just waiting for a reason to cast a vote, and I think strike just provided it. I could understand two JOATs in a game, but I wouldn't expect them to be this similar.wildwilliam wrote:I am pretty sure I can say this, but I also did not receive the flavor of my kill in my original pm. It came in a separate pm.

Because we both have a claim of Town JOATwildwilliam wrote:strike wolf wrote:I can't confirm the second one but I would assume mafia and other roles with kills would also be informed of their kill flavour. 1 is flawed and explained in #3 if you had a strong claim and no counter claim, you would not be investigated. The other side of that is I did attempt to investigate you.wildwilliam wrote:1) I had to be investigated by someone last night.
2) I am hoping by my second part of my post about the flavor of my kill that barett would back me up. maybe the same thing happened to him and his gatling gun.
3) why make such an important character a fake claim? She is one of the main members of Avalanche.
3 I kind of feel is A. You hiding behind a good fake claim b. Rodion placing in a strong fake claim to help mafia.
Then why were you going to investigate me if I had such a strong claim?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
What do the results of your investigation give you?strike wolf wrote:Why would our investigations be different? Only thing that's different is a role block vs a kill. Both our investigations are a cop style investigation and I don't see why Rodion would have different JOATs with different possible investigation results.
"Mafia" "not mafia"DoomYoshi wrote:What do the results of your investigation give you?strike wolf wrote:Why would our investigations be different? Only thing that's different is a role block vs a kill. Both our investigations are a cop style investigation and I don't see why Rodion would have different JOATs with different possible investigation results.
WW says his results are either guilty/not guilty. What do you receive?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.