

small map with 888

Moderator: Cartographers







The piece will look at and make sharper/stand out more. The text is not blurred but will look at a different font.bryguy wrote:Small Map:
- I'd suggest improving the quality of the knight picture, the knight piece picture in the movement example, and the explanation/bonuses text. All are blurred or fuzzy in some way.
No, the E looks like an E.- The E looks like an F, since the knights helmet overlaps under it.
It is not pixelated. I know what you are talking about - the black and white part of the shield is made of squares.Both Maps:
- The coat of arms above England is rather pixelated. This, in my opinion, detracts from the overall graphics.
Will get it to stand out some.- The knight playing piece in the movement example is somewhat harder to see. Could this be made to stand out a bit more? Maybe a slight drop shadow of some sort? Inner shadow? Something to set it off from the similar colored background.
Thanks for popping in at 1am.Just what I see at a quick glance at 1 am.





Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Are your referring to the marching ants around the outside (which could go easily) or the whole grey bit altogether (which I like and think does go with the theme)?gimil wrote:Sorry for the delay koontz,
Don't know if you heard but the weather disconnected me for a few days.
Anyway...there seems to be two distinct aspects of this map that I like...the problem is I don't feel the two go together. Firstly the actual chess board and the title I like. They are simplistic and easy on the eyes. Then there is your detail/texture background outline and coat of arms that have the potential to be something interesting. The problem is...the simplistic foreground and detailed heavy background don't fit together. They clash aesthetically.
I suggest you scrap everything that isn't simplistic and easy going. Try and fit the map around your beautiful chess board. I know this may not be what you want to hear at this point (especially since it has been a while since I last visited). But at the moment I simply don't feel this is up to standard yet.
Cheers,
gimil

Actually I am interested by what DiM has suggested. I think a stone chess board would work.koontz1973 wrote:So gimil says to go the more simplistic look as he likes the title and DiM says to go the other way. Let me have a look at it, but right now I need to get Rorke's Drift sorted this weekend. As soon as I get that sorted, I will take another look at this.
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
I like both ideas so am planning on getting a mock up for both ways done next week. I will then let the community decide. If for some reason inspiration fails me, I can ask for some suggestions. But with the current map, a stone chess board would work really well. Sort of like flag stones. then remove the large knight or replace him with something more aggressive or realistic.gimil wrote:Actually I am interested by what DiM has suggested. I think a stone chess board would work.koontz1973 wrote:So gimil says to go the more simplistic look as he likes the title and DiM says to go the other way. Let me have a look at it, but right now I need to get Rorke's Drift sorted this weekend. As soon as I get that sorted, I will take another look at this.




Will see about the legend going onto the side.sannemanrobinson wrote:Could you put the legend on the top or the side? This will make scrolling less necessary.
Maybe a clock can be integrated in the legend?

Not to worry, removed it. If I make this any smaller, the large map will be the normal size of a small map. At least the scrolling will be reduced.natty_dread wrote:The text is a bit distracting...


You are having a laugh.thehippo8 wrote:"Two forward and one to the side" could be confusing for some people (yes there are airheads in this world). Maybe "two straight then one to the left or right" might be better? I can just picture some moron thinking that "forward" means "away from your starting position" and any direction meaning "two possible directions". If you don't think people are that stupid then leave it as it is as I prefer the sound of your wording!!


Yes, but the dumb might not be able to read a diagram.natty_dread wrote:There's already a drawn diagram on the map for the illiterate... the wording is fine.
