Moderator: Community Team
see? no more messy bodies to clean up.In the aftermath of the suicides, Foxconn installed safety nets in some of its factories
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Which resulted in them laying off several "body collecting staff" at those plants.john9blue wrote:relax dude, they are addressing the problem like any responsible company should:
see? no more messy bodies to clean up.In the aftermath of the suicides, Foxconn installed safety nets in some of its factories
gotta break a few eggs, man.2dimes wrote:Which resulted in them laying off several "body collecting staff" at those plants.john9blue wrote:relax dude, they are addressing the problem like any responsible company should:
see? no more messy bodies to clean up.In the aftermath of the suicides, Foxconn installed safety nets in some of its factories
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
f*ck WalMart!!!!!!thegreekdog wrote:Would you boycott products from these companies due to working conditions at Foxconn... relevant links below (and idea stolen from The Daily Show): Amazon, Apple, Barnes & Noble, Cisco, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Intel, IBM, Microsoft, Motorola, Netgear, Nintendo, Nokia, Panasonic, Philips, Samsung, Sharp, Sony, Toshiba, and Vizio...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxconn#ci ... Foxconn-11
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... ctory.html
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technolo ... ork/47193/
Indeed.2dimes wrote:Too late, North America is absolutely the catcher in that relationship. No lube either.Woodruff wrote:f*ck WalMart!!!!!!
Because the Chinese government totally represents the people, and shit.barackattack wrote:I don't hear the Chinese government complaining.
This reminds me of the time the UK press got their panties all twirled up into a bunch because CHILDREN in Ivory Coast were WIELDING MACHETES and working for LESS THAN TWO POUNDS A DAY.
Then you ask the locals, and they think that's good pay, that it's good for the children to work and that they have no problem whatsoever with children using knives.
This commercial practice has received the barackattack Certificate of Ethics.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
You hit on something there.thegreekdog wrote:These conditions also beg the question as to whether Americans actually want to bring manufacturing jobs back to America.
Such a fatcat...BigBallinStalin wrote:I'm not that outraged.
What alternative occupations do these workers have?
What portion of their salary would are they willing to dedicate to safer worker conditions?
a link? I did not see it above, unless I goofed somehow.thegreekdog wrote:It is worth taking a look at the Daily Show segment on this.
There are two problems here:Juan_Bottom wrote:I went down the list, the only companies I'm involved with are Microsoft and possibly Barnes & Noble. Other than being too poor to buy anything ever, I don't know what I'm supposed to do about this. I gave up on everyone but Barack Obama a while ago anyway.
The People's Authoritarian Capitalist Party?thegreekdog wrote:First, the mistreatment of workers in China, a country that, given its rhetoric and type of government, should be glorifying workers.
I meant that it's the business of the Chinese and not anyone else. I hate when hippies stick their noses into another country's affairs.spurgistan wrote:Because the Chinese government totally represents the people, and shit.
But that's the thing. This has never been about average, working Americans getting jobs. This is ahout those at the top getting wealthy.thegreekdog wrote:[
Second, the people and government in the United States have a problem with "sending jobs overseas." This would be a perfect rallying cry for Americans to stop gross abuse of workers and, at the same time, bring jobs back to the United States. The corollary to that is we'd have to decide how well to try the U.S. workers who make these products and live with the potential increase in price of such products.
You have obviously never done an internet search in China (I haven't either) or talked to people who have (that, I have done!).barackattack wrote:
And how is the Chinese government any less representative than, say, the governments of the US, UK etc.? And yadda yadda.
If you carry it out to the companies these companies supply, etc then it is truly hard to avoid them. You CAN buy used, which at least means the person getting your money is not those places directly. However, we are not likely to see PCs at our local "farmer's market" cooperative any time soon.Juan_Bottom wrote:I went down the list, the only companies I'm involved with are Microsoft and possibly Barnes & Noble. Other than being too poor to buy anything ever, I don't know what I'm supposed to do about this. I gave up on everyone but Barack Obama a while ago anyway.
You're looking at 10% of the exchange while missing the remaining 90%.PLAYER57832 wrote:But that's the thing. This has never been about average, working Americans getting jobs. This is ahout those at the top getting wealthy.thegreekdog wrote:[
Second, the people and government in the United States have a problem with "sending jobs overseas." This would be a perfect rallying cry for Americans to stop gross abuse of workers and, at the same time, bring jobs back to the United States. The corollary to that is we'd have to decide how well to try the U.S. workers who make these products and live with the potential increase in price of such products.
Just look at the evidence.
Walmart shows us that most Americans really don't truly care about jobs. If they did, they would not buy from Walmart. Yet, it is now the largest retailer in the US and employs more people than any other US company.. and largely at not much above minimum wage, with very poor benefits. If you want a summary of what is wrong with America, THAT is it!
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Pretty scary actually. Its more or less what anyone at the top of a corporation aims for, even if they dont know it. Its actually the ultimate conclusion of pure capitalism, and no labor unions, and Im amazed at the number of people in this country, who dont realize they are arguing and voting for the same kind of treatment in the future here, or how close that reality really is.thegreekdog wrote:It is worth taking a look at the Daily Show segment on this.