Moderator: Community Team
I don't know who those are, so no, I haven't laughed at them.john9blue wrote:because you've never laughed at jon stewart or stephen colbert. ever.natty_dread wrote:Nope, pretty much alwaysjohn9blue wrote:only when you don't agree with their political messagenatty_dread wrote:
POLITICAL JOKES
They Are Unfunny

Ok, I admit it, I lol'd.ViperOverLord wrote:
Five Trolls! Ah! Ah! Ah! Ah!
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.

saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
You're seriously going to try to censor political dmps? That's bull shit and you know it. Mods have already officially stated that political dmps are okay. How about you just tell the people that are bitching about political dmps to respect the rights of posters? They only do it when they are transparently against a poster and his/her politics like John said. Had I posted a Bush dmp there'd be no problem.MeDeFe wrote:
Now, I know this discussion has taken place at least once already, we even have some logs of it, so how about we attempt to keep this thread free of politics. Approximately half of all threads on the first page are somehow related to politics, we don't need this one to derail into more of the same as well. This goes for all sides of the political spectrum.
1. I'm the one that was baited and mass trolled upon and yet you feel the need to refer to my post? Thus showing your usual sense of unfairness/bias.MeDeFe wrote:The normal rules regarding baiting, flaming, trolling etc. also still apply. Of course you are free to ignore them and find yourself on the short end of a disciplinary-measures-stick-with-a-heavy-knob (sometimes referred to as "banhammer") if that is what you prefer.
The post you quoted did not refer to you specifically, nor was it intended to.ViperOverLord wrote:Is there really a need for this? I'm the one that was initially baited and yet you refer to my post (thus showing your inherent bias against me). I posted appropriate material and then was bombarded with trolling after the fact.MeDeFe wrote:The normal rules regarding baiting, flaming, trolling etc. also still apply. Of course you are free to ignore them and find yourself on the short end of a disciplinary-measures-stick-with-a-heavy-knob (sometimes referred to as "banhammer") if that is what you prefer.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
I accept that answer and I even appreciate the shout-out on the joke for that matter.MeDeFe wrote:The post you quoted did not refer to you specifically, nor was it intended to.ViperOverLord wrote:Is there really a need for this? I'm the one that was initially baited and yet you refer to my post (thus showing your inherent bias against me). I posted appropriate material and then was bombarded with trolling after the fact.MeDeFe wrote:The normal rules regarding baiting, flaming, trolling etc. also still apply. Of course you are free to ignore them and find yourself on the short end of a disciplinary-measures-stick-with-a-heavy-knob (sometimes referred to as "banhammer") if that is what you prefer.
Funny how you constantly seem to be the one who is persecuted by absolutely everybody...ViperOverLord wrote:1. I'm the one that was baited and mass trolled upon and yet you feel the need to refer to my post? Thus showing your usual sense of unfairness/bias.

Nope, all political demots are unfunny. Bush jokes ceased to be funny c. 2005, if they ever were, and were just way too played out after that. They're too easy.VOL wrote:How about you just tell the people that are bitching about political dmps to respect the rights of posters? They only do it when they are transparently against a poster and his/her politics like John said. Had I posted a Bush dmp there'd be no problem.
I couldn't agree more. There's enough of that crap spamming the forums without it oozing into here as well.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Nope, all political demots are unfunny. Bush jokes ceased to be funny c. 2005, if they ever were, and were just way too played out after that. They're too easy.VOL wrote:How about you just tell the people that are bitching about political dmps to respect the rights of posters? They only do it when they are transparently against a poster and his/her politics like John said. Had I posted a Bush dmp there'd be no problem.
The only purpose the political demots serve is to create this stupid argument again and again. As was mentioned earlier, more than half of the threads on the first page are political related, post that crap somewhere there.
-TG
Silvanus wrote:perch is a North Korean agent to infiltrate south Korean girls
I stand up for what's right. The amount of trolls coming after me is irrelevant. Either we're allowed to post political dmp's without troll persecution or we're not. I'm awaiting MeDeFe's verdict still.natty_dread wrote:Funny how you constantly seem to be the one who is persecuted by absolutely everybody...ViperOverLord wrote:1. I'm the one that was baited and mass trolled upon and yet you feel the need to refer to my post? Thus showing your usual sense of unfairness/bias.
I'm just saying... when you're right and everyone else in the world is wrong, it might be time to consider that maybe it's the other way around?


We know, buddy. We know.ViperOverLord wrote:I'm a troll.
VOL considering that over the last 15 months you have been told more than NOT to post political posters here you should be familiar with the rule that they are not supposed to be in this thread.ViperOverLord wrote:I stand up for what's right. The amount of trolls coming after me is irrelevant. Either we're allowed to post political dmp's without troll persecution or we're not. I'm awaiting MeDeFe's verdict still.natty_dread wrote:Funny how you constantly seem to be the one who is persecuted by absolutely everybody...ViperOverLord wrote:1. I'm the one that was baited and mass trolled upon and yet you feel the need to refer to my post? Thus showing your usual sense of unfairness/bias.
I'm just saying... when you're right and everyone else in the world is wrong, it might be time to consider that maybe it's the other way around?
And btw, your characterization of 'everybody' is laughable as you should not discount the silent masses who are not posting a prosecution or defense b/c they aren't serving their own personal vendettas. I know which posters are predisposed to harass me and which ones are generally respectful of my rights as a poster. And there's no surprises in this instance.
And that is my last word on this matter at this time as we've already been told to return to dmp activities.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
You do the politics/race whistle thing pretty often, and you really could do with stopping the random victimization posts. It's rare to see a post or a PM from you without a demand or a challenge, or an ultimatum.ViperOverLord wrote:What the hell are you talking about Srike Wolf? Political DMPs are accepted and the mods have explicitly told me that. I sought clarification the last time people bitched and that is what I was told. And furthermore, there are tons of political dmps by tons of posters in this thread.
ViperOverLord wrote:

How about a quote?ViperOverLord wrote:What the hell are you talking about Srike Wolf? Political DMPs are accepted and the mods have explicitly told me that. I sought clarification the last time people bitched and that is what I was told. And furthermore, there are tons of political dmps by tons of posters in this thread.
You're right, it's hardly an official rule stated in the community guidelines.ViperOverLord wrote:MeDeFe: What's your official edict. Can we or can we not post political demotivational posters (in this thread)? Trying to avoid political dmp's is hardly a rule.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.