Moderator: Community Team
TheSaxlad wrote:The Dice suck a lot of the time.
And if they dont suck then they blow.
I know no-one has proof,that is why adherents need faith to believe.barackattack wrote:I don't know if anyone has proof.
No proof?chang50 wrote:I know no-one has proof,that is why adherents need faith to believe.barackattack wrote:I don't know if anyone has proof.
Thanks pal,same to you.Well it is the single most fascinating topic ,at least for me..codeblue1018 wrote:No proof?chang50 wrote:I know no-one has proof,that is why adherents need faith to believe.barackattack wrote:I don't know if anyone has proof.![]()
I figured I'd see a post from you on this topic Chang. Nice to see you around still.
It's rather more than just semantics,if as you say 'there is no god,and I state that as a fact',how would you go about proving this non-existence?Atheism/theism relates only to belief or the lack of,not knowledge which relates to agnosticism/gnosticism.Barns wrote:I can see the slight semantic difference between proof and evidence but, to be honest, when it comes to god/s and such I see little point in differentiating. There is no god and I state that as a fact.
Fascinating here as well Chang. I think that in order to have proof, you need evidence. I think the proof starts in the bible or in other words, the evidence. We can agree to disagree on this topic as I am very aware of your beliefs. I'm not sure if you have or not Chang, but have you read the bible? You most likely have by reading posts of yours in the past. With that said, I am curious on your viewpoint regarding the the bibles words/message. What does it mean to you and how in your opinion did these words come about?chang50 wrote:Thanks pal,same to you.Well it is the single most fascinating topic ,at least for me..codeblue1018 wrote:No proof?chang50 wrote:I know no-one has proof,that is why adherents need faith to believe.barackattack wrote:I don't know if anyone has proof.![]()
I figured I'd see a post from you on this topic Chang. Nice to see you around still.
Am I wrong in saying there is no proof,as opposed to evidence,for the existence of gods?Not saying the evidence is remotely convincing btw.
Well I haven't read the whole book,but I obviously don't think it was divinely inspired.It is one holy book amongst many,re-interpreted many times,contains some historical truth,has some beautiful poetry/prose,and an ambivalent morality,its contents arbitrarily chosen by men.codeblue1018 wrote:Fascinating here as well Chang. I think that in order to have proof, you need evidence. I think the proof starts in the bible or in other words, the evidence. We can agree to disagree on this topic as I am very aware of your beliefs. I'm not sure if you have or not Chang, but have you read the bible? You most likely have by reading posts of yours in the past. With that said, I am curious on your viewpoint regarding the the bibles words/message. What does it mean to you and how in your opinion did these words come about?chang50 wrote:Thanks pal,same to you.Well it is the single most fascinating topic ,at least for me..codeblue1018 wrote:No proof?chang50 wrote:I know no-one has proof,that is why adherents need faith to believe.barackattack wrote:I don't know if anyone has proof.![]()
I figured I'd see a post from you on this topic Chang. Nice to see you around still.
Am I wrong in saying there is no proof,as opposed to evidence,for the existence of gods?Not saying the evidence is remotely convincing btw.
Cb
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
well at least you're honest about your beliefsBarns wrote:There is no god and I state that as a fact.
human survival instinctmaxfaraday wrote:Actually I don't care wether there's a God or not, but something has always been intriguing me:
where does this notion of right and wrong, good and evil come from?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
no sex before mariage is human survival instinct?john9blue wrote:well at least you're honest about your beliefsBarns wrote:There is no god and I state that as a fact.
human survival instinctmaxfaraday wrote:Actually I don't care wether there's a God or not, but something has always been intriguing me:
where does this notion of right and wrong, good and evil come from?
well at least you're honest about your beliefsjohn9blue wrote:Barns wrote:There is no god and I state that as a fact.
no sex before mariage is human survival instinct?zimmah wrote:human survival instinctjohn9blue wrote:Were does this notion of right and wrong, good and evil come from?Barns wrote:There is no god and I state that as a fact.
Of course they do,prohibiting these things led to greater social cohesion and cooperation.zimmah wrote:what about theft, idoltry, adultry and many other things that hardly have anything to do with survival?

Ok - if there is a God would it be a guy with a beard? Would it have a human image?human survival instinctmaxfaraday wrote:Actually I don't care wether there's a God or not, but something has always been intriguing me:
where does this notion of right and wrong, good and evil come from?
Animals have a survival instinct too, but I don't think they know right from wrong.john9blue wrote:well at least you're honest about your beliefsBarns wrote:There is no god and I state that as a fact.
human survival instinctmaxfaraday wrote:Actually I don't care wether there's a God or not, but something has always been intriguing me:
where does this notion of right and wrong, good and evil come from?
monogamy can have evolutionary benefits. "no sex before marriage" is just a codification of this maximzimmah wrote:no sex before mariage is human survival instinct?john9blue wrote: human survival instinct
makes sense, not.
we weren't talking about religious morality in particular. unless you think that one can't be a moral person without religion?DJ Teflon wrote: <god stuff>
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
i fail to see how monogamy helps to get a more diverse genepool. wasn't the point in evolution to get a genepool as dverse as possible, and therefore its beneficial to have sex with as many persons of the opposite sex as possible? preferable persons with different genetic attributes?john9blue wrote:monogamy can have evolutionary benefits. "no sex before marriage" is just a codification of this maximzimmah wrote:no sex before mariage is human survival instinct?john9blue wrote: human survival instinct
makes sense, not.
we weren't talking about religious morality in particular. unless you think that one can't be a moral person without religion?DJ Teflon wrote: <god stuff>