Moderator: Community Team
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
sorry my bad not very good at the writing stuff its just the way i respond without writing a story without sounding like the idiot that i amRagian wrote:Codi, I have a wee bit of problems with your post. Nothing scummy or anything. It's just...what is catnip and what is you? Obviously, I can go back and check cat's post...but...is this the way you guys comment on other guy's post or?
I'm not trying to be a dick, I'm just trying to wrap my head around what is yours and what is his

hell thats a first thanks ive been called the town idiot in the last 2 gameswas rather clever.
Well...perhaps this only proves that I'm dumber than youcodierose wrote:hell thats a first thanks ive been called the town idiot in the last 2 gameswas rather clever.

surly thats a man thingwasn't paying attention.


codierose wrote:Post by codierose » Wed Feb 08, 2012 1:40 pm
wasn't paying attention.
surly thats a man thing
you didn't answer my question though so what are you apart from being femaleyou have claimed town but what
does town always get a night kill role
No problem at all - I just let it go in game chat, but I figured that with the potential for pages and pages and pages of posts here, I had best say something... And if anyone sees a pattern to my posts that screams "female", I'd love to know what it is! (Curiousity, felines... not so healthy for the cat, sometimes...)Ragian wrote:@cat, sorry about the gender thingie. I type "he" by default...that's how language/society is more or less (man-kind and all that). I'll be sure to refer to you as she. I'm sorry![]()

So we might have had TWO Vigilantes at the start of the game? Both Town? Both opting not to make a kill on the first night? Huh. That seems like a bit much, but I don't have an experience base to make a judgement about the likelihood of that.Ragian wrote:I've always found it best that the vigilante does not kill the first night since it's difficult to see who should be gunned down (vig usually use guns, where serial killers use blades). So even though there was only one nightkill, we might still have a vig in our midst.
codierose wrote:hmm did he die because of this quoteedocsil wrote:catnipdreams wrote:well, I can't see anything from the posts so far to take me in another direction, so due to inactivity, unvote vote wildwilliamThat is a lynch I believe. You are going to be in the hot seat tomorrow.
No. I'm an idiot. I was talking in general and inadvertently ended up talking about this game. I wouldn't think that we would have two vigs. Since Edoc died, we probably don't have any vigs leftcatnipdreams wrote:So we might have had TWO Vigilantes at the start of the game? Both Town? Both opting not to make a kill on the first night? Huh. That seems like a bit much, but I don't have an experience base to make a judgement about the likelihood of that.Ragian wrote:I've always found it best that the vigilante does not kill the first night since it's difficult to see who should be gunned down (vig usually use guns, where serial killers use blades). So even though there was only one nightkill, we might still have a vig in our midst.
I do have another question: I've read about balancing games; we started with 13 players, so am I correct that there "should" be three Mafia, and at most one third party, in this size game?

Well...I don't know other players here but Pershy, MoB, and tenbar (from our clan), so I can't say who are rookies and who are veterans though cat does indicate that she's new to this.Iron Butterfly wrote:codierose wrote:hmm did he die because of this quoteedocsil wrote:catnipdreams wrote:well, I can't see anything from the posts so far to take me in another direction, so due to inactivity, unvote vote wildwilliamThat is a lynch I believe. You are going to be in the hot seat tomorrow.
Vote Codierosa
The fact is he did die and that quote only put a big bullseye on his back. Who better to kill then someone whos last words draw suspicion to someone else? Now we can do WIFO arguments from here to kingdom come, but for me the sticking point to my vote is in reading Codiersos attempt to disect Cats defense.
It just seems like the perfect set up on Cat.
I beleive Cat is innocent and heres why.
She is a noob. I played with her in her first game. She still does not know the ins and outs. She did not realize that most folks beleive those who hammer look suspicious. She did it for her own valid reasons. She has every right to be defensive as she is being set up for the fall.
I could be wrong about Codierosa but he jumped on Cat really quickly in a very indirect way suggesting Cat should be looked at.
I am presented with either looking at Cat or looking at Codierso. For now my case is on Coriderso.



The reason catnip asked if we would have two was because I fucked things up by making a general statement and then mistakingly applying it to this game where the vig was nightkilled. Skimming, Pershy?pershy wrote:@catnip - I very much doubt there would be another town vig and your wondering makes me a little suspicious
I agree with other stuff u say tho
however - I like IronButterfly's reasoning.
I think I'll vote Codierosa to apply pressure and keep things moving as we have now entered a spurt of activity in this game which is good to see.

You beleive Cat or Cod (LOL I just realized the names make them punny opposites) are indeed Mafia/Town why not make your case instead of passing the buck to everyone else? I made mine and didnt beat around the bushtenbar wrote:Allright, we are making progress.
Stop fogging you silly Dane or i am gonna FOS ya (HUUUUUGE HUGS!)
Cod was mighty fast on cat, which usually points to one of two things: scum looking to start a frenzy, or knowledge based on a nightime investigation.If he is forced to claim and he is Mafia you have given him an idea of how to do so with a better chance of drawing out other Town power roles.
Could go either way in my books. Cat claims some kind of town, But we dont know about cod yet. We are heading towards forcing a claim from him...is this what we want? The question should be, is that what you want? You are asking others, whom you have no idea are mafia or town, what their opinion is. Speak for yourself.
Worth noting too that inna-gadda-da-vida jumped quickly to cat's defense...could be a scummate protecting his own. Not saying for sure, just pointing ot that we need to keep this in mind for when we find out what cat is.
And if Cod turns Mafia does that make you scum? I really hate the argument that someone may be guilty because they offered an argument pointing out the obvious
I think we got cat or cod at this point, as they are likely on opposite sides...but which one?
tenbar...who the heck are you talking to? You may be freinds with some of the people, but I have no idea who "you silly Dane" is. Please clarify.tenbar wrote:Allright, we are making progress.
Stop fogging you silly Dane or i am gonna FOS ya (HUUUUUGE HUGS!)
"inna-gadda-da-vida"??? Are you referring to Iron Butterfly?tenbar wrote:Cod was mighty fast on cat, which usually points to one of two things: scum looking to start a frenzy, or knowledge based on a nightime investigation.
Could go either way in my books. Cat claims some kind of town, But we dont know about cod yet. We are heading towards forcing a claim from him...is this what we want?
Worth noting too that inna-gadda-da-vida jumped quickly to cat's defense...could be a scummate protecting his own. Not saying for sure, just pointing ot that we need to keep this in mind for when we find out what cat is.
I think we got cat or cod at this point, as they are likely on opposite sides...but which one?
I'm going to form a pattern here...notice how Pershy is "kind of" casting suspicion at me, while at the same time naming someone else.pershy wrote:Conscientious townie? Probably.Nebuchadnezer wrote:Okay, I can go two ways right now...
1. Vote for Rastan...something or other - He hasn't posted anything. If I were mafia, I'd probably keep a low profile so as to avoid saying anything controversial that might bring unwanted attention to me.
2. Vote for Ragian - Questions the joke voting, then picks MoB for being "the popular guy" or something to that affect. Which just happens to be his only post (I think). Again, keeping a low profile, but doing nothing to draw attention to himself (but his trying to not draw attention, drew my attention, so he's really not succeeding in not drawing attention).
So, with all that blow-hardiness...
VOTE RAGIAN
Scum posing as conscientious townie? Possibly. I mean - who isn't keeping a low profile right now anyway?
However I know Ragian and he's fun to lynch![]()
Mod prod raston will you? Or we can all prod him several times repeatedlly with our pitch forks.
Perhaps the best OMGUS vote of the game! How convenient for Pershy that the bandwagon came around for the lynch. He never even had to do anything...just wait.pershy wrote:ha ha good one willianwildwilliam wrote:I am very leery of players asking others how they should act or what they think would be a good route to follow. typically it is the followers and not the leaders that are scum.
could it be scummy tactics - trying to seem that they're leading in a townie manner? Maybe
vote william
Pershy did seem to be throwing off the "I'll do whatever the group wants" mentality. Despite Wild William being 3rd party, he did have a point about Pershy's logic. However, again, Pershy won't commit. Note also that edocsil, former townie, was picking up on suspicious activity here.pershy wrote:Simple - I threw out a question to everybody about whether to keep up pressure on Mob and William pounces on it saying it's scummy cause I'm following? Just sounds scummy to me and like a mafia trying to appear townie by saying this. Also I had the thought that he did this as a defensive maneuver because I had joke voted him before. Early to tell anything yet tho.edocsil wrote:I do not follow this logic. If it isn't explained I will vote for you, if it is as I think I understand it I believe it to be scummy.pershy wrote:ha ha good one willianwildwilliam wrote:I am very leery of players asking others how they should act or what they think would be a good route to follow. typically it is the followers and not the leaders that are scum.
could it be scummy tactics - trying to seem that they're leading in a townie manner? Maybe
vote william
Again casting suspicion on another player. Trying to make doubt about everyone grow...yet remaining rather aloof. As if he didn't make the suggestion that catnip could be scum. He won't "rule anything out" though.pershy wrote:well - does catnip seem defensive to anyone apart from me? What he says makes sense. Of course he could be mafia and wanted edocsil out of the picture in case he lead town against him and and put him in the "hot seat". Right now my thinking could go either way, I'm not ruling anything out. At least we got that poisoner out of the way. I had a feeling that WW was a bad egg from the beginning.
This here just reinforces pershy's MO this game. Casting suspicion on catnip again, but then following IronButterfly...because that's what mafia do.pershy wrote:@catnip - I very much doubt there would be another town vig and your wondering makes me a little suspicious
I agree with other stuff u say tho
however - I like IronButterfly's reasoning.
I think I'll vote Codierosa to apply pressure and keep things moving as we have now entered a spurt of activity in this game which is good to see.
sorry what does this meanNebuchadnezer wrote:Fastposted by Iron Butterfly.
It means I was putting my case on Pershy together before Iron butterfly's post was there. while putting my case together, Iron butterfly posted his case...thereby "fastposting" my post.codierose wrote:sorry what does this meanNebuchadnezer wrote:Fastposted by Iron Butterfly.
how this all got turned on me baffles me but i will respond when i bet home on my computer
@pershy you like to fos one way and vote another anyways will respond in a couple of hours