Moderator: Community Team

jgordon1111 wrote:I dont think I did the same thing I was protecting a town role that got called under fire with no real reason,just At best Edoc role fishing and everyone let it slide.
Then everyone says I am not playing by the rules.
So I claimed like the four asked.
If that is bad play then I am still at a loss, Something out of the normal made some of you very hostile. I find that odd somehow.
IB an explanation if you will, why someone not wanting to claim makes this happen.
And if you meant eagle blade because I said if I survive(lol) Edoc or BG is going to die why is that bad?
pretty much everyone I see in these games kill without a good reason. I held off on night one because I didnt have enough to kill randomly,which happens alot.
Because they seem like scum to you, does not make them scum. look at how wildwilliam comes across. I would have shot him in a heart beat in our first game together. I watched him like a hawk. Even in endgame he was ajerk...yet he turned town.
Now your threatening to night lill people and they have done nothing other then to follow the protocals of the game. you know....there really isnt much more to say. Now we are suppose to let you kill people at random who may be town?
Now in my eyes I do. I have 2 targets that seem like scum to me. So if given the chance one of them will now die.

Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.

I don't believe we know you well enough to pick up a role from hints, and any idiot can copy/past a fake. I do not know which game you are referring to, I hope no slack was cut for you there either.jgordon1111 wrote:Edoc I understand all you have said, and in my own way rather than claim, I tried to warn you of what I might be per the first game we played(several times) when I refused to claim for WW. Second game you should have remembered I suck at lying and fake claims, so I had one option stand my ground and hope for the best and see who bandwagoned me. It is what it is.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
I agree 100%, why is it okay "BG time" when edoc is clearly in the picture too. There's something wrong with that picture.BGtheBrain wrote:ok.
so the claim is good and sounds legit and the flavor would reflect a tree person (I would think)
1) Edoc is quick to say, "cool man, but dont waste it on me!" This leaves his target as me. Obviously, that doesnt sit well with me.
2)So here's my issues.Leehar wrote:Do we still continue with the jgordon case? or find something new on BG perhaps as jg wanted?
And sorry for partly submarining last couple of days. I did try to come out in jg's defense earlier, because I did kinda understand his pov, but it just seemed too tough to come out with a feasible defense for him when he was also seemingly digging a bigger hole for him, and I just didn't want to get egg on my face if he did end up flipping scum or something if lynched.
1) Edoc and I should be waiting equally at best in the eyes of jgordon. Actually, about 2 or 3 other people had the same objections to jgordon not claiming as I did, so sure we could include them, but JG was pretty clear he was wary of myself and Edoc.
2) Leehar conveniently suggests only me (while ignoring Edoc as an option that JG clearly stated) then apologizes for submarining..
My thoughts. Leehar's post is very suspicious. The omission of Edoc, plus apologizing for submarining doesnt wit well with me.
I don't know who you are in game, but I don't think your claim is as solid as mine. Some people I believe have figured out who I am at this point and know why I should be kept alive. This is how I play town power, it makes me a target but it also gets me the defense I need at night.BGtheBrain wrote:ok.
so the claim is good and sounds legit and the flavor would reflect a tree person (I would think)
1) Edoc is quick to say, "cool man, but dont waste it on me!" This leaves his target as me. Obviously, that doesnt sit well with me.
2)So here's my issues.Leehar wrote:Do we still continue with the jgordon case? or find something new on BG perhaps as jg wanted?
And sorry for partly submarining last couple of days. I did try to come out in jg's defense earlier, because I did kinda understand his pov, but it just seemed too tough to come out with a feasible defense for him when he was also seemingly digging a bigger hole for him, and I just didn't want to get egg on my face if he did end up flipping scum or something if lynched.
1) Edoc and I should be waiting equally at best in the eyes of jgordon. Actually, about 2 or 3 other people had the same objections to jgordon not claiming as I did, so sure we could include them, but JG was pretty clear he was wary of myself and Edoc.
2) Leehar conveniently suggests only me (while ignoring Edoc as an option that JG clearly stated) then apologizes for submarining..
My thoughts. Leehar's post is very suspicious. The omission of Edoc, plus apologizing for submarining doesnt wit well with me.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
I said my vote would stay on Jgordon not because I beleived there was a strong case but because of his behavior. i am still worried he will do somthing foolish but that is out of my control unless we decide to lynch.Leehar wrote:Nice try on what? You said it, not me.
But now that you've made out the mountain out of a molehill, it's up to you whether you want to follow through on it or not, but frankly those kind of cases are very irritating.
My vote tho is going for the only person not to have commented in day 2 (at least to my recollection), so vote Commander9

