Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
Does the irony hurt? I mean, don't you feel a little...dirty...doing this? Or are you long past that point?

No worries mate. I hope that this is cleared. Because, if so, anyone I assume could set up around 40 games with these settings per 100 games (just looking at your last game page) knowing that they are likely (70% chance) to attract NRs (that's the bottom line here). Problem is, continuos use of a map/game setting that regularly gets NRs in them (being too "unattractive" for regulars) have in some cases been considered a rule violation. So makes sense to see what is and what is not considered ok.Twin Killler wrote:OMG is this thread really about me. To whom-ever made this thread you are more than welcome to come join my games.I am not happy about so many NR's joining my games but its not like I have a choice.
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
Wasn't alstergren warned to not make any more spurious reports? This is the second one where he wishes a type of play is not considered farming because he needs a new way to exploit the points system.alstergren wrote:No worries mate. I hope that this is cleared. Because, if so, anyone I assume could set up around 40 games with these settings per 100 games (just looking at your last game page) knowing that they are likely (70% chance) to attract NRs (that's the bottom line here). Problem is, continuos use of a map/game setting that regularly gets NRs in them (being too "unattractive" for regulars) have in some cases been considered a rule violation. So makes sense to see what is and what is not considered ok.Twin Killler wrote:OMG is this thread really about me. To whom-ever made this thread you are more than welcome to come join my games.I am not happy about so many NR's joining my games but its not like I have a choice.

LOL. It's not spurious. I've never seen such a high amount of NRs (70% of last 100 games!) in a potential "reverse" farming matter. It seems clear that Twin Killer knows that these settings attract NRs (the older game pages, see link, looks the same and he pretty much says so himself in this thread). Guess the excuse would be that he mixes his game lists up a bit having thrown in 60 different games with his last 40 games with this NR flypaper setting.lurkerleader wrote:Wasn't alstergren warned to not make any more spurious reports? This is the second one where he wishes a type of play is not considered farming because he needs a new way to exploit the points system.
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
i hate to tell you but a precident has been set in these cases. you will be told to change your settings to 6 player games or as king achilles will say.Twin Killler wrote:well my point will be that that is the map and settings I like so if they can block NR players from joining than block the god damn cooks too.If I lose to a NR player I lose large points so is it really farming?????????????
and what do most of us say bollocks you are making the games as long as you are not inviting nr's you should be ok.twin killer you are walking down a close line to farming i will advise you to change your settings to 6 player or run the risk of more reports like this. i am noteing this for now if i see your name appear again you will proberly receive the next infraction level you have.


Change it to what tho? The settings are basic (i.e no freestyle) its just the map thats tricky? Not trying to argue just curious? Surely they can't stop antone playing 1v1 games on any map they've deemed is allowed?QoH wrote:Usually Adin will tell the player accused of this to change up his settings. This has happened many times, and if he continues to play the settings he does, he could get warned etc. etc.

This is a spurious report, reverse farmingalstergren wrote:LOL. It's not spurious. I've never seen such a high amount of NRs (70% of last 100 games!) in a potential "reverse" farming matter. It seems clear that Twin Killer knows that these settings attract NRs (the older game pages, see link, looks the same and he pretty much says so himself in this thread). Guess the excuse would be that he mixes his game lists up a bit having thrown in 60 different games with his last 40 games with this NR flypaper setting.lurkerleader wrote:Wasn't alstergren warned to not make any more spurious reports? This is the second one where he wishes a type of play is not considered farming because he needs a new way to exploit the points system.
Don't let my saracasm fool you. I'm genuinly interested to see if this is considered "NR farming" or not since the rule/rulings seem to be all over the place. And besides, what I think doesn't matter, the rules are the rules and those are for the mods to decide looking at the stats.

lurkerleader wrote:Wasn't alstergren warned to not make any more spurious reports? This is the second one where he wishes a type of play is not considered farming because he needs a new way to exploit the points system.
alstergren wrote: LOL. It's not spurious. I've never seen such a high amount of NRs (70% of last 100 games!) in a potential "reverse" farming matter.
I'm genuinely interested to see if this is considered "NR farming" or not since the rule/rulings seem to be all over the place. And besides, what I think doesn't matter, the rules are the rules and those are for the mods to decide looking at the stats.
Alstergren I outlined your own statements that make this a spurious report, which was the reason the other thread was locked. Your not making a report to the C&A Team to bring to the communities attention of a violation of the rules, instead your going through game finder to find users who's games have some sort of suspect in them with games with new recruits that you think will be Cleared. Your searching for a ruling that will bless you to systematically play New Recruits. Don't you get it yet ? Your creating a pattern history to go against you regardless if admin Clears whatever case you get Cleared. Cause at that point in time you will adopt their methods in the hopes of playing a lot of games against NR's.alstergren wrote: No worries mate. I hope that this is cleared. Because, if so, anyone I assume could set up around 40 games with these settings per 100 games (just looking at your last game page) knowing that they are likely (70% chance) to attract NRs (that's the bottom line here). Problem is, continuos use of a map/game setting that regularly gets NRs in them (being too "unattractive" for regulars) have in some cases been considered a rule violation. So makes sense to see what is and what is not considered ok.

have to agree with Ickyetseddie here....I think this a completely different thing then the case I brought against raston_morue...raston_morue - still farming NR's[warned]Ickyketseddie wrote:I think in all the other cases tho eddie arn't those guys creating 5 player games whereas 6 players nr's can't join. Can't see that they can apply the same ruling when someones playing 1v1 as we all know thats a completely different game.


last i checked the open forum was for the community to speak up and say their opinions, if its not then why not just handle everything via E-Ticket..?... and your a clan director not a C&A mod sooooooBruceswar wrote:For all you speculating on this case. It is a very simple and shut case. CC sees this as farming. Just as you joining games vs new recruits. Creating games that attract new recruits is the same thing. You will be told not to make so many of the same type of games. Use other maps / settings instead. Or not to make so many that new recruits join so much. There is no way to defend these actions. Please stop posting with incorrect info.

His rank isnt unattractive. I know plenty who would join to take his points or even play a balanced game.alstergren wrote:No worries mate. I hope that this is cleared. Because, if so, anyone I assume could set up around 40 games with these settings per 100 games (just looking at your last game page) knowing that they are likely (70% chance) to attract NRs (that's the bottom line here). Problem is, continuos use of a map/game setting that regularly gets NRs in them (being too "unattractive" for regulars) have in some cases been considered a rule violation. So makes sense to see what is and what is not considered ok.Twin Killler wrote:OMG is this thread really about me. To whom-ever made this thread you are more than welcome to come join my games.I am not happy about so many NR's joining my games but its not like I have a choice.
