awwwww poor dimDiM wrote:i know i still have nightmares about it![]()
therapy hasn't helped much either
ive been wanting to have a reason to use that emoticon since i 1st saw it
Moderator: Cartographers
awwwww poor dimDiM wrote:i know i still have nightmares about it![]()
therapy hasn't helped much either
Sorry if my comments offended you cairnswk, that was never my intention. To be honest, I just don't have the time to look over all the maps in development and comment on each as they progress. At the moment, the best I can do is to have a good look over the maps that I personally feel might need that last push to get them into Final Forge. I'm not saying that is the case for every map, but generally I'm going to put more effort into studying a map nearing completion than a map in early to mid-development where the foundry works so well.cairnswk wrote:With your statement:, I think this is not the right thing to do to map creaters...to come in at the last minute and ask big changes like you have done here.However, you can take comfort in the fact I only give detailed looks into maps that I feel are winding down in development.
No kidding Quench my map! LOLKEYOGI wrote: Geez, some of you cartographers are a touchy bunch.
The small map is 526px tall, compared to World 2.1 at 610px, Philippines at 620px, North America at 506px, King of the Mountains at 548px, Africa at 524px, Middle Earth at 508px, and a slew of other maps at or near 500px tall. So certainly not some new unprecedented level of scrolling required, it shouldn't be a problem.Coleman wrote:Okay, back to the subject at hand. I can see where the map height might be a problem. I haven't really looked to see if it is taller then World 2.1 though.
EDIT: Yeah, it definitely isn't. The whole thing fits on my screen for the large map, which it doesn't on 2.1. I'm gona have to say it isn't a major problem from my point of view... But meh.
Andy..I am humbled!AndyDufresne wrote:---Cairns Coral Coast Map has reached the ‘Final Forge’ Stage. I've revived this thread from the pits of the Foundry furnace and have examined the contents. Nearly every major concern has been addressed. If there are any other current concerns, please make your voice heard. There will be at least two days (but may extend pass that) for you to post any objections; if no one has posted any protest after two days the map will be deemed finished with the 'Foundry Brand' of approval and will be submitted for live play. If after two days there is still discussion going on it may continue until said discussion has reached the conclusion that the map has reached its final and polished version.
- Final Forge
Post questions and concerns if any.
--Andy

KEYOGI, thank-you for your reply. I hear what you say, and hopefully will try to be less touchy in future, now I understand what this whole process is about. Yes, unfortunately, artists are a touchy lot.KEYOGI wrote:Geez, some of you cartographers are a touchy bunch.

Enigma wrote:go cairns!!
DIM wrote:weee. finally. congrats cairns. \\:D/
Thankyou all. Let me not rest for there is work to do I believe, as I am sure there will be some queeries come of out this Final Forge.Samus wrote:Yay Cairns!![]()
Attended to....Guiscard in the maps below.Guiscard wrote: where you have the one way pass graphic in the legend, I think it could do with a couple of mountains either side
Samus, I have provided a selection of about 9 maps below with different colours for Maize Silos in question, inclulding the original colour. I have chosen these colours as they either blend with the map and/or are appropriate to the area and take into consideration the adjoining areas which are not in question.Samus wrote:I don't think I like the new color of Maize Silos. Would it be possible for us to see a selection of colors (including the old one)?










yup- though i like the original one as well, it didnt seem to terrible off. maybe a colour slightly lighter than the original and slightly darker than 33-1 X-PDiM wrote:33-1 or 33-8 are the best
So which one are you voting for here Enigma...33-1, 33-8 or this other colour slightly darker?Enigma wrote:yup- though i like the original one as well, it didnt seem to terrible off. maybe a colour slightly lighter than the original and slightly darker than 33-1 X-PDiM wrote:33-1 or 33-8 are the best
yes, that will appear on the next map version already done.enigma wrote:on the legend - could you make the grey river outlines thinner?

umm.. 1st the inbetween one, 2nd 33-1, 3rd 33-8cairnswk wrote:So which one are you voting for here Enigma...33-1, 33-8 or this other colour slightly darker?Enigma wrote:yup- though i like the original one as well, it didnt seem to terrible off. maybe a colour slightly lighter than the original and slightly darker than 33-1 X-PDiM wrote:33-1 or 33-8 are the best
spinwizard, if this was directed at my map, i am unaware of the battle you speak of, so you must be having the battle with yourself. LOL.spinwizard wrote:lol, damm u, urs got forged first in the fireworked battle! i will return!well done m8, i don't like the texture but if u like it go 4 it!

m8 can be read as matecairnswk wrote:spinwizard, if this was directed at my map, i am unaware of the battle you speak of, so you must be having the battle with yourself. LOL.spinwizard wrote:lol, damm u, urs got forged first in the fireworked battle! i will return!well done m8, i don't like the texture but if u like it go 4 it!
And who/what is M8 - are you referring to Map V33-8?
thanks for your thoughts on the texture, I believe you have expressed this to me previously about parchment.