Rated M ENDGAME: Scene on Page 42

shieldgenerator7 · Post by **shieldgenerator7** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 7:03 pm

jgordon1111 wrote:well crap I didnt no that

lshicastr! u serious?

BGtheBrain · Post by **BGtheBrain** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 7:09 pm

jgordon1111 · Post by **jgordon1111** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 7:22 pm

LOl sg7 I am serious why do you think I dont copy paste stuff I cant figure it out either. Thats why I retype stuff people say to me.

shieldgenerator7 · Post by **shieldgenerator7** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 7:26 pm

jgordon1111 wrote:LOl sg7 I am serious why do you think I dont copy paste stuff I cant figure it out either. Thats why I retype stuff people say to me.

wow. I had no idea.

srsly tho, if you need any general computer help, let me know. I know a little bit about this kind of thing.

edocsil · Post by **edocsil** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:13 pm

nàme wrote:well, im going with my gut and will force some suggestions.

vote edocsil

Cases count not gut feels. I stated earlier that I have some reservations about you and have hoped to get another to champion the case, but notice my lack of a vote. I will only vote when there is a case, gut simply doesn't cut it.

jgordon1111 · Post by **jgordon1111** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:24 pm

well I am going to back name due to there not being any other cases at the moment voote edoc that way the soft claim we dont know becomes a solid claim we can think about.

How about you BG you usually vote beings there are no other cases at the moment,you going to help see if edoc will hard claim so we can see what he has going besides a soft claim?

BGtheBrain · Post by **BGtheBrain** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:31 pm

edocsil · Post by **edocsil** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:43 pm

jgordon1111 wrote:well I am going to back name due to there not being any other cases at the moment voote edoc that way the soft claim we dont know becomes a solid claim we can think about.

How about you BG you usually vote beings there are no other cases at the moment,you going to help see if edoc will hard claim so we can see what he has going besides a soft claim?

How about no. L2P

jgordon1111 · Post by **jgordon1111** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:10 pm

I suspected that would be your answer BG

Yes Edoc I know it is only 2 votes for you, But in all honesty this is starting to look a little off,you bring weak no cases to the table and BG cosign's
them as legit, because there is nothing else going on

A weak case is brought against you for starting to look a little scummy,and BG wont cosign on the same terms,beings nothing is going on now

And rather than pull another player's role into the light, I say that you and BG together acting as a team(when you say there are not teams) is looking very scummy at the moment, so that soft claim of (dont vig) me is offset by BG has already claimed the Doc role,so we dont need his claim.

edocsil · Post by **edocsil** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:11 pm

If all the good players are saying you are doing something wrong perhaps you should reevaluate your position.

jgordon1111 · Post by **jgordon1111** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:15 pm

Thank you for the advice Edoc but that still doesnt mean your not scum, And all the good players might be wrong on occassion,you gave me an example of that remember.

edocsil · Post by **edocsil** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:20 pm

I can't tell if you are serious or if you are just trolling? Your act is so unreal I can't help but question.

Iron Butterfly · Post by **Iron Butterfly** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:23 pm

jgordon1111 wrote:I suspected that would be your answer BG

Yes Edoc I know it is only 2 votes for you, But in all honesty this is starting to look a little off,you bring weak no cases to the table and BG cosign's
them as legit, because there is nothing else going on

A weak case is brought against you for starting to look a little scummy,and BG wont cosign on the same terms,beings nothing is going on now

And rather than pull another player's role into the light, I say that you and BG together acting as a team(when you say there are not teams) is looking very scummy at the moment, so that soft claim of (dont vig) me is offset by BG has already claimed the Doc role,so we dont need his claim.

Its gotten to the point where we either ignore him and hope he doesnt kill anyone Town at night or just lynch him.

BGtheBrain · Post by **BGtheBrain** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:36 pm

shieldgenerator7 · Post by **shieldgenerator7** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:38 pm

I, for one, am going to wait for the day to end and hope it all gets better tomorrow. VOTE NO LYNCH

Dive! Dive! I'll be submarining till night. Good night!

-SG7 (

)

jgordon1111 · Post by **jgordon1111** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:41 pm

Ok IB what about my post saying I believe Edoc is scummy by the way he is play makes you want to ignore what I have said.

What sign Have I missed tells you Edoc is not scum?

MoB Deadly · Post by **MoB Deadly** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:42 pm

Iron Butterfly wrote: This is a team game.

edocsil wrote: As I said in PM this isn't a team game. Trust no one.

THIS IS INSANITTYYYY!!!!!

jgordon1111 wrote:the town was probably pretty sure there was a vig role from the begining Edoc,but you forced out the role on BS evidence and a bandwagon, and really it was your fault eagle got mod killed you knew he was a kid and targeted him first again on BS evidence and the beginnings of a bandwagon. Taking charge like that has only lead to bad for the town so far in my opinion. yet you and BG seem to be again teaming up on me,and that now seems bad again. so for the team to realize your leadership is flawed I will take the lynch. In the hopes that they vig at least one of you in the night and lynch the other tomorrow.

false

Also false

also also false

JG, you to stop your personal vendetta against edoc unless you are going to make a real case on him. Saying "he's scum, he's scum" after he forced you to claim looks really bad. Edoc has not proved that he is leading us in a bad direction right now, so why would we turn on one of our only leaders in the game? He is important to the game to keep our sputtering activity going at this point.

I know anyone will be willing to vote edoc given a real case, but not doing any work into a case and just asking players to vote edoc because YOU think his leadership is bad isn't going to make any progress.

fastposted x3

edocsil · Post by **edocsil** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:48 pm

I am increasingly worried that our paranoid vig is going to kill me tonight. If we don't get something actually worth pursuing I would rather hang him then go for a NL.

jgordon1111 · Post by **jgordon1111** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:55 pm

not paranoid Edoc just wanting to see who says what about you,you play different than I do lets leave it at that.

Iron Butterfly · Post by **Iron Butterfly** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:52 pm

jgordon1111 wrote:not paranoid Edoc just wanting to see who says what about you,you play different than I do lets leave it at that.

You have no case against him other then he made a small one against you. If no one else will start I will. We have done all we can to help you see reason, logic whatever. Im tired of listening to you.

Vote jgordon

jgordon1111 · Post by **jgordon1111** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:55 pm

ok IB For some reason I havent listened to anyone,or reason or logic thank you for trying.

nàme · Post by **nàme** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:13 pm

edocs only defense is that there is no case against him. were opening one, and i dont care if he doesnt want to answer, he should. jgordons claim, in my opinion, was sound and i dont think he is dangerous to the town. what would we gain by killing him? a wee bit of security for someone who i think is scum. what if we keep him around? someone we can probably trust in his alliegance (sp?)

skillfusniper33 · Post by **skillfusniper33** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:23 pm

nàme wrote:edocs only defense is that there is no case against him. were opening one, and i dont care if he doesnt want to answer, he should. jgordons claim, in my opinion, was sound and i dont think he is dangerous to the town. what would we gain by killing him? a wee bit of security for someone who i think is scum. what if we keep him around? someone we can probably trust in his alliegance (sp?)

But you haven't put anything on the table other than YOUR GUT FEELING. You are also backing JG because he was forced to claim.

I am tired of reading all this bullshit that edoc is scum because of gut feelings, and a vendetta for a very small and weak case...

jgordon1111 · Post by **jgordon1111** » Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:55 pm

Backing me name is a real bad idea dont do it. You will get into something you cant and wont win. If you think Edoc is scum then go back through everything he has said since day one and look for it. A gut feeling will get You in trouble.

nàme · Post by **nàme** » Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:50 am

nàme wrote: he seems to take an immense amount of offense from any attack from him, always tries to throw multiple cases on the table as long as it is not himself, he makes sure he doesnt insult anyone with power, and everytime someone is getting close to being lynched he pushes even harder. maybe it is just me?

apparantly you guys missed this, so i will just put it out there again. if this isnt "evidence", no matter how weak, then nothing is that we can gain from discussion.

oh, and if you guys are certain me defending jgordon is certain death, why would i do it if it would cost me the game? you guys always mention it is madness, yet i am fearless of it. not scummy in the slightest there.

Rated M ENDGAME: Scene on Page 42

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence