Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:1) I routinely convince opponents and people I chat with to buy premium*
2) I think MORE people would invite friends/etc. IF CC were a lot less negative (baiting/flaming/trolling)
3) I'd be willing to start a thread about minority ownership shares -- but there'd have to be more control of excessively negative people
Negative, negativity, from (baiting/flaming/trolling) people with excess negativeness.
It appears, from your wildly excessive use of the word "negative", (and derivatives thereof), in virtually all of your posts, that people who don't agree with your, posts / treatment / method of achieving conk, are negatively negative. [Overly commared sentence I know, pls don't start grammer Nazi's.]
Is this a new word you are trying out, or do you actually believe that any post you don't agree with is.....well...negative.
Hoping for a positive response! 'Cos I'm with you on being positive about CC! [non sarcastic font]Got my new premium last month. Bargain at $25 for sure. [/non-sarcastic font]
But a serious question re premierships. Do you think your playing style + your alleged attempts to convince others, that you just slaughtered with difficult settings,(I'm including the effects on other members), has produced an
overall positive increase in memberships or ...a negative one?
Would not - a seq game (explaining e.g. the map, the bombard feature, after you've won / inviting them to be your dubs partner for a couple of games / supplying them with an SOC link, be a far better way to encourage more membership and encourage positivity?
Looking forward to your response. I'm just asking questions and hope to not come across as negative. I, like you, think the demise of CC is extremely exaggerated.
Nipp
(Pls don't call me Sean in any reply as it may compromise my internet I.D)
)
