Moderator: Community Team
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
This is a pretty viable way forward for mafia. Mafiascum (did anyone see it disappeared?) has a structure like that where newbie's play C9 games (with 2 vets) before being allowed elsewhere.BGtheBrain wrote:I think the problem is the # of games.
I think there should be a list of players who are "certified" as mafia players.
Anyone who wants to play, needs to complete a noob training game. Upon that, they are "certified" and can then join other games.
When I first started, I had no clue what I was doing and joined a few games. Spread myself thin and got so confused.
However, I did do a noob game, just not until after my first 2 or 3 games.
Right now, I feel the forum has more games than users, but more importantly tons of new people who have less of a clue than I do.
Thoughts on a certified list and a "recurring" noob game?
Back when I use to Mod Mafia games, I had a list of 'Veteran players' who had proven themselves either in my game or in one of the other two games usually offered, and these folks would get dibs on sign-ups. Then I would try to incorporate 2-4 'newer' players as test players, hoping they would turn out alright. I also didn't necessarily have 'open sign-ups'---basically players signed up to be a part of the pool from which I would choose from, no guaranteed spot.pmchugh wrote: This is a pretty viable way forward for mafia. Mafiascum (did anyone see it disappeared?) has a structure like that where newbie's play C9 games (with 2 vets) before being allowed elsewhere.

>Games started around 6 years agonagerous wrote:The old guard died over 2 years ago and when I say the old guard I mean those like me who used to play mafia in the OT forum
Interesting, what did you do if one of the new guys didn't post much? Did anyone complain about rejection?AndyDufresne wrote:Back when I use to Mod Mafia games, I had a list of 'Veteran players' who had proven themselves either in my game or in one of the other two games usually offered, and these folks would get dibs on sign-ups. Then I would try to incorporate 2-4 'newer' players as test players, hoping they would turn out alright. I also didn't necessarily have 'open sign-ups'---basically players signed up to be a part of the pool from which I would choose from, no guaranteed spot.pmchugh wrote: This is a pretty viable way forward for mafia. Mafiascum (did anyone see it disappeared?) has a structure like that where newbie's play C9 games (with 2 vets) before being allowed elsewhere.
--Andy

I think things were less complicated in the ancient "era" that you modded in. It is less clear who is a trusted player, even people who have been here for years disappear often or post little. The main difference now is definitely the speed games are played at.AndyDufresne wrote:If one of the non-veteran people proved to be a bust, they tended to get weeded out pretty fast from the game, so the veterans could play amongst the selves---survival of the fittest style I think. ha. But for the most part, I think a 70-30 mix of Veterans to Newbies worked pretty well for games, giving people a chance to A. Experience new players, and B. Give new players experience in games with more veteran folks.
If I run a mafia game again, I'll probably do a 'sign-up pool' again, since it is what I am use to.
--Andy
Aw, shucks. You're gonna make me blush.Saf wrote:I mean, I remember when tails was as green as some of our new players now, but he's turned into a very solid player. Celebrate player progress instead of trying to compare "eras" that had different conditions.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Aye, I'm not familiar with Era 1 players as much, but you'd want to add the big time mods (Daring Overlord, Aimless, and probably some of the more notorious people like NES).strike wolf wrote:there's more than two eras of mafia really. these are the time lines that I kind of distinguish.
Era 1: Players like Mandy, Wicked, AK_Iceman, AndyDufresne, Nagerous, LSU Tiger Josh, Nark, Got Tonkaed etc. (about the time I had my first games)
Era 2: I think this is more when players like Safari and Edocsil came into play.
Era 2.5: I think would be around the time I started to become more of a regular in the mafia forums as well as when players like Commander9, Vio, Tails and a couple others started playing.
Era 3: would be around now. We're getting a lot of new players signing up for games right now.
Someone who's been more regular mafia player over the years could probably come up with a more accurate list...there's a lot of people i could consider from Era 1 but it would be too long of a list to get into right now.

everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.

This is also fairly true. Most games on Day 1 end up being a newb lynch because they wanted to vote no lynch to start things off. At the very least, you'll get a newb to claim out of it.jgordon1111 wrote:I think part of the thing might be,the newer players like myself dont follow the protocols you guys are used to. And I think it may be the cause of some of what is happening in the new games. Dont get upset with us, we are learning and trying it a different way.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Could someone please explain why it is so important compartmentalize? So 10 years from now I can look back with pride on the fact that I belonged to era 3 because some noob player in era 10 was an annoying pain in the ass?strike wolf wrote:there's more than two eras of mafia really. these are the time lines that I kind of distinguish.
Era 1: Players like Mandy, Wicked, AK_Iceman, AndyDufresne, Nagerous, LSU Tiger Josh, Nark, Got Tonkaed etc. (about the time I had my first games)
Era 2: I think this is more when players like Safari and Edocsil came into play.
Era 2.5: I think would be around the time I started to become more of a regular in the mafia forums as well as when players like Commander9, Vio, Tails and a couple others started playing.
Era 3: would be around now. We're getting a lot of new players signing up for games right now.
Someone who's been more regular mafia player over the years could probably come up with a more accurate list...there's a lot of people i could consider from Era 1 but it would be too long of a list to get into right now.
Heh people like to identify but I don't think anyone will discriminate based on era, well not any more than they do nowthebutterfly wrote:
As for your groupings, the old eras are cover way more time than the new ones lol. Era 1 or era 2 needs split up.thewolf wrote:
There are 2 main purposes. Purpose 1 is to show who has been around the longest.Iron Butterfly wrote:Could someone please explain why it is so important compartmentalize? So 10 years from now I can look back with pride on the fact that I belonged to era 3 because some noob player in era 10 was an annoying pain in the ass?strike wolf wrote:there's more than two eras of mafia really. these are the time lines that I kind of distinguish.
Era 1: Players like Mandy, Wicked, AK_Iceman, AndyDufresne, Nagerous, LSU Tiger Josh, Nark, Got Tonkaed etc. (about the time I had my first games)
Era 2: I think this is more when players like Safari and Edocsil came into play.
Era 2.5: I think would be around the time I started to become more of a regular in the mafia forums as well as when players like Commander9, Vio, Tails and a couple others started playing.
Era 3: would be around now. We're getting a lot of new players signing up for games right now.
Someone who's been more regular mafia player over the years could probably come up with a more accurate list...there's a lot of people i could consider from Era 1 but it would be too long of a list to get into right now.