Iraq map

spinwizard · Post by **spinwizard** » Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:56 am

i had a go at this a few weeks back, have fun!

DiM · Post by **DiM** » Sat Apr 21, 2007 5:48 am

what are the dots?

dominationnation · Post by **dominationnation** » Sat Apr 21, 2007 7:48 am

DiM wrote:what are the dots?

they look like they have an airplane on them so airports Im guessing

Spockers · Post by **Spockers** » Sat Apr 21, 2007 7:53 am

ok, no map should ever, ever have airports.

Apart from being a result of poor territory design, they are nonsensical, as aeroplanes could just go to any country they want.

DiM · Post by **DiM** » Sat Apr 21, 2007 8:48 am

Spockers wrote:ok, no map should ever, ever have airports.

Apart from being a result of poor territory design, they are nonsensical, as aeroplanes could just go to any country they want.

you're right and why do we need airports? plans can land anywhere perfectly especially in the mountains.

and in the same line of thought, why do we have harbours. i mean ships can also go anywhere, right?

PS: another fine post by spockers

mibi · Post by **mibi** » Sat Apr 21, 2007 10:16 am

may mega continents for Shiite Sunni and kurd?

luckiekevin · Post by **luckiekevin** » Sat Apr 21, 2007 10:20 am

Spockers wrote:
Apart from being a result of poor territory design, they are nonsensical, as aeroplanes could just go to any country they want.

I'm sorry rev, but I have to agree

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Sat Apr 21, 2007 12:50 pm

Spockers wrote:ok, no map should ever, ever have airports.

Apart from being a result of poor territory design, they are nonsensical, as aeroplanes could just go to any country they want.

in correct.

While technically airplanes could attack anywhere they couldn't really fort anywhere. Those are strategically placed airfields where the military actually has them.

I intend to make those more pretty also.

Any other responses in the early stages?

Spockers · Post by **Spockers** » Sat Apr 21, 2007 6:49 pm

reverend_kyle wrote:
Spockers wrote:ok, no map should ever, ever have airports.

Apart from being a result of poor territory design, they are nonsensical, as aeroplanes could just go to any country they want.
in correct.

While technically airplanes could attack anywhere they couldn't really fort anywhere. Those are strategically placed airfields where the military actually has them.

I intend to make those more pretty also.

Any other responses in the early stages?

Ok, fair enough. But, are you going to have the rule that airports can attack other airports, or airports can attack any territory on the map?

Heimdall · Post by **Heimdall** » Sat Apr 21, 2007 7:56 pm

I would call Iraq Civil War, and have a series of dots being
American bases and another series of dots being British.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Sun Apr 22, 2007 8:44 pm

Spockers wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
Spockers wrote:ok, no map should ever, ever have airports.

Apart from being a result of poor territory design, they are nonsensical, as aeroplanes could just go to any country they want.
in correct.

While technically airplanes could attack anywhere they couldn't really fort anywhere. Those are strategically placed airfields where the military actually has them.

I intend to make those more pretty also.

Any other responses in the early stages?
Ok, fair enough. But, are you going to have the rule that airports can attack other airports, or airports can attack any territory on the map?

that would cause it to be unplayable so no.

Spockers · Post by **Spockers** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:16 am

exectly, so if aeroplanes can't attack anywhere, they become nonsensical.