International Maritime Organization is the first result.edocsil wrote:Was this so hard?
Moderator: Community Team
International Maritime Organization is the first result.edocsil wrote:Was this so hard?
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
I know, I clicked it. First non-sponsor result is accurate.pancakemix wrote:International Maritime Organization is the first result.edocsil wrote:Was this so hard?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Other than I can't see the gain of the plan, you got it all.drunkmonkey wrote:Here are your first two posts supporting your vote:jonty125 wrote:My position on Rodion hasn't changed. FOS shield for his post on the top of Page 8 I think.jonty125 wrote:vote Rodion. For instantly assuming there are no 3rd party players and asking some people effectively to give up one of the 2 games.So, your position seems to be that Rodion is scummy because:jonty125 wrote:Take this scenario: I am town/mafia. I could say town/town and then suicide as town where I was town and if I came under pressure as mafia I could say, look I'm a truthful guy - I must be town.
1) His plan didn't allow for 3rd party players
2) He's asking some people (mafia) to give up one of the two games
3) You think somehow claiming T/T means you'll be cleared if you flip town in one game, which Rodion never said.
This is a very weak case, IMO. Did I miss anything?
drunkmonkey wrote:So, your position seems to be that Rodion is scummy because:
1) His plan didn't allow for 3rd party players
2) He's asking some people (mafia) to give up one of the two games
3) You think somehow claiming T/T means you'll be cleared if you flip town in one game, which Rodion never said.
This is a very weak case, IMO. Did I miss anything?
jonty125 wrote:4) Other than I can't see the gain of the plan, you got it all.
jonty125 wrote:Yes I agree finding mafia is good but we should also be looking for 3rd party such as SK.

I thought I made it quite obvious that parts 2 and 3 were awful reasons to cast a vote. 1 is shaky. I was expecting you to respond by clarifying the real reasons you voted. The last thing I expected was "yep, you got it - I think he's scummy because he wants mafia to concede and for something I'm pretending he said". I think I found the bandwagon case I'm ready to settle on.jonty125 wrote:Other than I can't see the gain of the plan, you got it all.drunkmonkey wrote:Here are your first two posts supporting your vote:jonty125 wrote:My position on Rodion hasn't changed. FOS shield for his post on the top of Page 8 I think.jonty125 wrote:vote Rodion. For instantly assuming there are no 3rd party players and asking some people effectively to give up one of the 2 games.So, your position seems to be that Rodion is scummy because:jonty125 wrote:Take this scenario: I am town/mafia. I could say town/town and then suicide as town where I was town and if I came under pressure as mafia I could say, look I'm a truthful guy - I must be town.
1) His plan didn't allow for 3rd party players
2) He's asking some people (mafia) to give up one of the two games
3) You think somehow claiming T/T means you'll be cleared if you flip town in one game, which Rodion never said.
This is a very weak case, IMO. Did I miss anything?
Are you kidding me? You agree finding mafia is good, but...? BUT??? I'm not the least bit concerned about SK until the night flavor suggests one. Mafia is priority #1 right now. If I could make the above vote bolder, I would.jonty125 wrote:Yes I agree finding mafia is good but we should also be looking for 3rd party such as SK.

I see nothing to indicate anything besides straight m vs t at this point. (D1 for gods sake) I agree, jonty is attempting to misdirect with his posts.drunkmonkey wrote: Are you kidding me? You agree finding mafia is good, but...? BUT??? I'm not the least bit concerned about SK until the night flavor suggests one. Mafia is priority #1 right now. If I could make the above vote bolder, I would.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
One COULD almost argue point 2, but there's no reason to feel sorry for someone who would take an offer so statistically bad for them it hurts.Rodion wrote:drunkmonkey wrote:So, your position seems to be that Rodion is scummy because:
1) His plan didn't allow for 3rd party players
2) He's asking some people (mafia) to give up one of the two games
3) You think somehow claiming T/T means you'll be cleared if you flip town in one game, which Rodion never said.
This is a very weak case, IMO. Did I miss anything?jonty125 wrote:4) Other than I can't see the gain of the plan, you got it all.
3 shouldn't even be considered as I never said that.
2 is only a point if you feel sorry for mafia players, which would make you highly scummy.
1 is what I tried to make Jonty understand about 6 pages ago that "devising a plan to find mafia is good regardless of whether the game has or does not have 3rd-parties", but I gave up in the middle of the argument because I lost faith in his intelligence.
4 only reassures myself that I made a good decision giving up in 1.
Like Safari said, I'm currently getting lynched because kids (VS and Jonty, perhaps you can add CMS5 here) at the family gathering picked a side and stuck with it.
Why should we be looking for them? Do you know something we don't?jonty125 wrote:Yes I agree finding mafia is good but we should also be looking for 3rd party such as SK.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
No, but with no information from scenes yet we can't estimate how many killers we have so I'm trying to make sure we keep all paths open.pancakemix wrote:
Why should we be looking for them? Do you know something we don't?
If you think he's attempting to misdirect, what does that tell you about Jonty's alignment?edocsil wrote:I see nothing to indicate anything besides straight m vs t at this point. (D1 for gods sake) I agree, jonty is attempting to misdirect with his posts.

The question was not really adressed to you, but thanks for the input. You did use "if", though. Can you tell us whether you think he is trying to misdirect or not?crazymilkshake5 wrote:Well, if he is trying to misdirect, i would say that he is most likely mafia trying to draw attention away from the mafia,

So after spending 3+ days without a single post, someone asks you if you have anything to say and you just:crazymilkshake5 wrote:I think that he was just making a statement, so no, i do not believe that he was trying to.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
You Asked if i had anything id like to say, and just before you had said the quoted phrase, you had questions, so I felt like they were directed at me.Rodion wrote:Soundman, Shield, New Guy, Milkshake, Clever, VS - anything you'd like to say?

Wow really? Every single game has third parties? I've modded games where there were no third party players and I've played in plenty where there weren't either. That seems to be an incredibly large leap considering its Day 1, which leads me to believe you know something the rest of us don't.crazymilkshake5 wrote:Well, if he is trying to misdirect, i would say that he is most likely mafia trying to draw attention away from the mafia,
About DM and Edocsil not willing to plan for third parties, I believe that in every mafia game you enter you should go in thinking that there are third parties and town and mafia.
That is what i have to say.


Why would I do that? Let's tick off the possible third party characters.crazymilkshake5 wrote:Wow safari, Really? I said that you should go in thinking that there are third parties, not that every game had third parties.
READ!

crazymilkshake5 wrote:You Asked if i had anything id like to say, and just before you had said the quoted phrase, you had questions, so I felt like they were directed at me.Rodion wrote:Soundman, Shield, New Guy, Milkshake, Clever, VS - anything you'd like to say?
@New Guy - This is growing into a game of severe misunderstandings, all of them coincidentally being made by players that vote me. Crazy, isn't it?new guy1 wrote:fastposted- That is a good point, Im sure it was just a misunderstanding.